©Almeirhria The truth about cancer
In 1938 a Bill was presented to the 2nd Session of the 20th Legislature ofOntario for: "An act to authorize Rene Caisse to practice medicine in theprovince of Ontario in the treatment of cancer and conditions resultingtherefrom.”Along with the Bill was a petition which had gathered 55,000 signatures.
2
The bill failed by only 3 votes, but not without some influence from theCanadian Medical Association. The next move against Rene was the passing of anew act for the investigation of remedies for cancer.
2
In march of 1939, Rene and 387 of her supporting patients attended a publichearing before the full cancer commission. The Royal Commission allowed only 49of the patients to testify. The commissioners did not care what the patientshad to say. Most of the testimonies were dismissed as incorrect originaldiagnoses, with some doctors even denying their own previous diagnoses.
1
In short, they ruled on the claims that:Patients who received treatment from Rene had been wrongly diagnosed (bytrained doctors making many life or death evaluations)Patients who did recover experienced “Spontaneous Remission” (A blatant lie)In December 1939 the cancer commission effectively stated in their report afterthe hearing Essiac
®
had no merit and unless Rene disclosed the formula she wouldbe subject to prosecution under the Kirby bill.Rene stated: “I want to know that suffering humanity will benefit by it. WhenI can be given the assurance, I am willing to disclose my formula, but I havegot to know that it is going to get to suffering humanity.”
1
Rene kept her clinic open but closed it in 1942 when the fear of beingprosecuted and imprisoned by the Kirby bill became too much for her.In 1959, by invitation Rene teamed with Dr. Charles Armao Brusch, who was oneof the most respected physicians in the United States and personal physician topresident John F. Kennedy.Rene, working with Dr. Brusch and the director of research Dr. Charles McCluretested Essiac
®
on cancer patients in the Brusch clinic. Essiac
®
proved itsworth on all patients. Rene and Brusch then attempted to improve Essiac
®
byadding additional ingredients, which proved to be successful, increasing it’spotency.Soon after, the medical establishment applied it’s dictatorial force by makingit increasingly difficult for Rene and Dr. Brusch by refusing to accept furtherresults and forbidding it’s members to refer patients to ‘unproven remedies’.At that point Rene returned home to Bracebridge, whilst she entrusted Dr.Brusch to continue treating the few patients that came to him with Essiac
®
.Rene remained active from 1962 to 1978 by supplying Essiac
®
to Dr. Brusch.In 1984 Dr. Brusch treated his own bowel cancer solely with Essiac
®
.Dr. Brusch wrote:“I endorse this therapy even today for I have in fact cured my own cancer, theoriginal site of which was the lower bowel, through Essiac
®
alone.”
1
In October 1977 Rene signed a contract with David Fingard. The contractagreements were that for rights to the Essiac
®
Formula, David’s company Resperinwould open five fully staffed clinics across Canada and give Essiac
®
free toterminally ill cancer patients. Shortly after signing Resperin applied to thedepartment of Health and Welfare asking permission for Essiac
®
to be tested in apilot program on terminal cancer patients. Hundreds of doctors across Canada,plus two hospitals were to administer Essiac
®
to their patients and monitor theresults.III
Leave a Comment