A
MERICANS
N
EGOTIATING IN
C
HINA
G
UANXI RELATIONSHIPS AND FOREIGNERS
–
DOORBELL OR SKELETON KEY
?
Part 1: Is guanxi a real thing? What is it?
,and raised the issue of ‘guanxi’
relationships. It is a controversial point among the international community in China. Dan Harris and SteveDickinson of CLB are not believers
–
warning that it doesn’t help all that much and may cause problems. On the
other hand, every conversation I have with a Mainlander eventually focuses on the power and importance of theirnetwork of guanxi connections.
What’s really going on here?
Let’s start with a quick definition. ‘Guanxi’ literally translates as ‘connection’ though it is often used to mean‘relationship’ and ‘network’. When Mainlanders use
the phrase among themselves, they are referring to a fluidnetwork of cordial business obligations and debts
–
sort of an institutionalized version of ‘you scratch my back, I’llscratch yours’. A person with a wide range of well
-placed relationships, all of whom acknowledge theirindebtedness and willingness to reciprocate, is clearly in a very advantageous position. Conversely, a person wholacks connections and is not in a position to do favors for new counter-parties is in a relatively weak situation. Theworst position of all is one who owes valuable favors to a wide range of highly placed connections.When Chinese associates talk to Westerners about guanxi, it takes on a slightly different meaning. Here theemphasis is on the ability to influence members of his network
–
to ‘make things happen’ and expedite profitable
transactions or bureaucratic approvals. A common Chinese business aphorism
–
“Everything is possible but nothingis simple” –
underscores the importance of guanxi in the Mainland. For a long time, guanxi was synonymous with
“local knowledge” –
but carried a strong implication of corruption and under-the-table inducements.
When the China economy was first opening to the world (up until the mid 2000’s), commercial laws were still
haphazard,
contradictory and opaque. In such a chaotic environment, a local ‘fixer’ was often required to prod
bureaucrats and state managers to make a decision
–
and a certain amount of persuasion helped to ensure thatthe decision was a favorable one. There was a time when no one
–
Westerner, Asian, Overseas Chinese orMainlander
–
disputed the need for guanxi. The only issue was locating someone who really had the connections
to facilitate basic business transactions. China’s central government, however, was busily
constructing what ithoped would be a strong legal system and a (relatively) transparent regulatory framework
–
and objected to theclose connection between guanxi and corruption, bribery & misuse of state assets.That is why Westerners in China often find themselves caught between two opposing views on the guanxi issue.On the one hand, locals still maintain it is the only way to get things done in Mainland China
–
and that without itforeigners will never overcome their status as rich but clueless outsiders. However, a growing community of experienced, knowledgeable international experts maintains that guanxi is an ineffective, expensive and ultimately
Leave a Comment