hrltnr in orensi speeh siene 171
Validity vs. reliability
cc f ady ad aby a mc d ycy, acad may aa ad w wd a y md f a dc d w jd dc. a may df-f ac f ady wc ycca ac ad ac aad d ab ( ady, a ady, c ady c.). W
d ccd w da, may c y -
wa y a cmm. ady f a d wc
ma wa dd ma. Ray ad a dw c ad ccy. Hw accay d md ma wa
dd ma? Hw mc w ay f mama ad by a ac by ac?T dc md a mdca mca. I m
reasonable, from a methodological point of view, to begin by determiningthe validity of a suggested method before it makes much sense to study its
aby. If md ca b w ac ady a w a acqc a b ab ad cay a aby ma.
If the validity is not known it will be a ‘black box’ whose reliability, if any,
will remain unexplained. We must keep in mind, however, that validity and
aby a a cc. A md may b ad a dad aby may a fm y am fc. A fa d f a ca w d ay. I wd b a cm wa f
m d m dm w cy c may dc
f w w w a ady f md -x. A d f ca w d md DNA w ady
is solidly supported by scientic evidence and whose reliability is extremely
, ab fc.
W c dc (a w a , m dc dc) a w jd m ady, m m-
a q b: Ha bac c wc y a camd b bad b d cc d? If w bac a y f dc , w d a q dm ad ad mdm dd. a, ad, c f aby f
‘black box’ type. We nd this rather surprising and quite unsatisfactory. We
wd k a a fd d f d am
ady f cd ma a ad md a adad y w a a b abd cd aby . fc w f b aby b a a
dad aay f cc d f md, .. ad-
ity. Based on these considerations we then explain why reliability tests have
Add a Comment
Paul Defoeleft a comment
perhellstromleft a comment
SpeakerForTheDeadleft a comment