Use your Facebook login and see what your friends are reading and sharing.
LEO STOLLER TRUTH SERUM BLOG's Documents
COUNSEL APPOINTED TO DEFEND LEO STOLLER IN FEDERAL FRAUD CASE
The Federal Defender Program is appointed to represent Leo Stoller, who was indicted on fraud charges, after the court reviewed Stoller's Affidavit of Financial Status and determined that Leo Stoller is financially unable to employ counsel. United States of America vs. Leo Stoller, United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Case Number 10 CR 1052-1, Judge Virginia M. Kendall. Leo Stoller is not an attorney, but claims to be an expert in many areas of the law, including legal ethics, intellectual property, trademarks, and appellate practice. Leo Stoller represents himself to the public as the director of an organization called the "Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics" (AEAE), which he claims is an "attorney watch dog group" established in 1974.
Category:Court FilingsReads:315Uploaded:01 / 15 / 2011ShareAdd to collectionLEO STOLLER ARRAIGNED ON FEDERAL FRAUD CHARGES
Leo Stoller arraigned on federal fraud charges. United States of America vs. Leo Stoller, United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Case Number 10 CR 1052-1, Judge Virginia M. Kendall. Leo Stoller is not an attorney, but claims to be an expert in many areas of the law, including legal ethics, intellectual property, trademarks, and appellate practice. Leo Stoller represents himself to the public as the director of an organization called the "Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics" (AEAE), which he claims is an "attorney watch dog group" established in 1974. The federal defender program has been appointed to represent Leo Stoller against the fraud charges, after the court reviewed his Affidavit of Financial Status and was satisfied that Stoller is financially unable to employ counsel.
Category:Court FilingsReads:425Uploaded:01 / 14 / 2011ShareAdd to collectionLEO STOLLER INDICTED FOR FRAUD
Leo Stoller indicted for fraud. United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois (Eastern Division), Case Number 1:10-cr-01052. Leo Stoller is not an attorney, but claims to be an expert in many areas of the law, including legal ethics, intellectual property, trademarks, and appellate practice. Leo Stoller represents himself to the public as the director of an organization called the "Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics" (AEAE), which he claims is an "attorney watch dog group" established in 1974. The federal defender program has been appointed to represent Leo Stoller against the fraud charges, after the court reviewed his Affidavit of Financial Status and was satisfied that Stoller is financially unable to employ counsel.
Category:Court FilingsReads:770Uploaded:01 / 07 / 2011ShareAdd to collectionU.S. DISTRICT COURT BANS LEO STOLLER
In a Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Eastern Division) on April 26, 2010, Chief Judge James F. Holderman clarifies the effect of a December 4, 2009 order issed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit regarding the filing ban imposed on Leo Stoller. The December 4, 2009 order issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit banned Leo Stoller from further filings in that court– in what is commonly referred to as a ‘Mack’ bar– for engaging in deceitful behavior. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ordered that the Mack bar against Leo Stoller is to remain in effect until at least December 4, 2011. In the Opinion and Order issued by the U.S. District Court for the Northern of Illinois, the Honorable James F. Holderman notes that the Seventh Circuit ordered ”‘the clerks of all federal courts in this circuit… to return unfiled any papers submitted either directly or indirectly by [Leo] [Stoller] or on [Stoller's] behalf.’” Therefore, the U.S. District Court reasoned, the plain language of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals’ Order requires that Leo Stoller be barred from initiating any new lawsuits in the Northern District of Illinois, and that the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois cannot permit Leo Stoller to litigate his claims in that court. Leo Stoller currently represents himself to the public as the executive director of the "Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE)", which he claims "is a not for profit group that advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974."
Category:Court FilingsReads:897Uploaded:05 / 13 / 2010ShareAdd to collectionSTATE OF ILLINOIS v. LEO STOLLER
July 22, 2002 Complaint filed against Leo Stoller by the Illinois Attorney General. The Complaint includes allegations that Leo Stoller engaged in wrongful conduct while soliciting donations that were purported to be for the benefit of 9/11 victims. Leo Stoller currently represents himself to the public as the executive director of the "Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE)", which he claims "is a not for profit group that advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974."
Category:Court FilingsReads:563Uploaded:05 / 07 / 2010ShareAdd to collectionLEO STOLLER AND LISA MADIGAN 9/11 CONSENT DECREE
Consent decree entered into between Leo Stoller and the Illinois Attorney General, Lisa Madigan, regarding the complaint that had been filed against Leo Stoller (please see State of Illinois v. Leo Stoller, above) alleging, among other things, that Leo Stoller had solicited donations for 9/11 victims in violation of the law. Leo Stoller currently represents himself to the public as the executive director of the "Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE)", which he claims "is a not for profit group that advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974."
Category:Court FilingsReads:357Uploaded:05 / 05 / 2010ShareAdd to collectionLEO STOLLER'S APPEALS DISMISSED EN MASSE
On March 15, 2010, the Appellate Court of Illinois (First Judicial District) entered an order dismissing several appeals filed by Leo Stoller. The matter came before the court on the court's own rule to show cause why Leo Stoller should not be held in contempt and the appeals dismissed. In this order, the Appellate Court of Illinois (First Judicial District) noted that it had taken judicial notice of an order entered by the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in the matter of In re Leo D. Stoller, No. 08-4240 (7th Cir., Dec. 4. 2009). In that order, the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit found that Leo Stoller had been deceptive and referred the matter to the U.S. Attorney for determination of whether Stoller should be prosecuted for perjury. The Appellate Court of Illinois (First Judicial District) also noted that Leo Stoller had filed a response to the matter before it on February 19, 2010, and that Leo Stoller had contradicted himself in his response. This order follows a long history of sanctions against Leo Stoller. Several courts have noted that Leo Stoller's "lack of credibility is a matter of public record." Leo Stoller currently represents himself to the public as the executive director of the "Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE)", which he claims "is a not for profit group that advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974."
Category:Court FilingsReads:1,868Uploaded:03 / 21 / 2010ShareAdd to collectionLEO STOLLER JUDICIALLY NOTICED FOR DECEPTION
On February 11, 2010, the Illinois Appellate Court (First District) granted an order taking judicial notice that Leo Stoller had been deceptive. The Illinois Appellate Court, on its own motion, also ordered that Leo Stoller show cause as to why he should not be held in Contempt of Court regarding sixteen appeals. The Court also ordered Leo Stoller to show cause as to why those appeals should not be dismissed. The Illinois Appellate Court entered the orders in view of an earlier order entered by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. In that order, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that Leo Stoller had been deceptive and referred the matter to the U.S. Attorney to determine whether Leo Stoller should be prosecuted for perjury. Leo Stoller represents himself to the public as the executive director of the "Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE)", which he claims "is a not for profit group that advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974."
Category:Court FilingsReads:3,382Uploaded:02 / 18 / 2010ShareAdd to collectionLEO STOLLER AND THE TRADEMARK OFFICE
A Petition to Revive Application and Response to Office Action was filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on January 11, 2010 with the signature of Christopher Stoller (Please see previous Scribd posting by ChiliPalmer75). The signature is a declaration by Christopher Stoller that all statements within the Petition are true to the best of his knowledge, and that willful false statements may subject him to criminal prosecution. Christopher Stoller was originally jailed in Arizona in January 2009. He was later transferred to the Arizona prison system, and according to law enforcement records, on January 11, 2010 (the date of the averment on the petition filed in the Trademark Office), Christopher Stoller was in an Arizona prison awaiting transfer to Illinois to face criminal charges in another matter. This post is a document dated January 28, 2010 and is a reply sent by the Trademark Office to Christopher Stoller at the address, phone number and e-mail address often used by Leo Stoller as the contact information for the "AEAE", an organization Leo Stoller alleges is dedicated to the enforcement of legal ethics, along with other so-called endeavors. Leo Stoller, of course, recently had an appeal dismissed by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals for making misrepresentations to the Court. Leo Stoller also had the 'Mack Bar' against him reinstated, which bans him from filing documents with that Court. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals also referred the matter to the United States District Attorney for determination of whether Leo Stoller should face criminal prosecution for perjury. In this January 28, 2010 reply to the Petition to Revive Office Action filed on January 11, 2010 by Christopher Stoller, the Trademark Office raises numerous questions about Leo Stoller's relationship with the applicant, among other matters. The paragraph titled 'Additional Inquiries' is of particular interest.
Category:Court FilingsReads:2,213Uploaded:02 / 04 / 2010ShareAdd to collectionCHRISTOPHER STOLLER TRADEMARK OFFICE PETITION
A Petition to Revive Application and Response to Office Action filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The petition is dated January 11, 2010 and bears the signature of Christopher Stoller. The signature is a declaration by Christopher Stoller that all statements within the Petition are true to the best of his knowledge, and that willful false statements may subject him to criminal prosecution. Christopher Stoller has been jailed in Arizona since approximately January 20, 2009 and is awaiting transfer to Illinois to face criminal charges in another matter. This document bears the Chicago address, phone number and e-mail address often used by Leo Stoller as the contact information for the "AEAE", an organization Leo Stoller alleges is dedicated to the enforcement of legal ethics. Leo Stoller, of course, recently had an appeal dismissed by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals for making misrepresentations to the Court. Leo Stoller also had the 'Mack Bar' against him reinstated, which bans him from filing documents with that Court. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals also referred the matter to the United States District Attorney for determination of whether Leo Stoller should face criminal prosecution for perjury. Leo Stoller currently represents himself to the public as the executive director of the "Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE)", which he claims "is a not for profit group that advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974."
Category:Court FilingsReads:2,297Uploaded:01 / 18 / 2010ShareAdd to collection
