Levitator scribbled: Important, help in research needed: WHO IS BARACK OBAMA and WHAT IS HE HIDING? October 19, 2009 I am trying to ascertain what happened to this individual, who was born in 1890 in CT, received his SS number in CT between 1977-1979 (probably he needed it for some SS benefits or medicaid benefits in his older age) , and whose SS# Obama used most of his life. We already know that another SS# Obama used 485-40-5154 was issued in IA to Lucille Ballantyne, born 12.22.1912, deceased 09.13.1998. Last residence was at 50140 Lamoni, Decatar, IA. Does anyone know where did she die, how? I am deeply concerned, what happened to the person whose SS# Obama used in MA, Chicago and currently using in DC? This person (could have been a man or woman) was born in 1890 and would’ve been 119 years old today. Since we don’t know of any 119 y.olds in this country, it is safe to assume this person is deceased. I am greatly alarmed, why isn’t he noted as deceased in the National databases. Why is Obama using his SS# with such unbelievable arrogance? Does he know how this person died? Is he sure for some reason that no one will be reporting his death today or tomorrow? I need more info on other deaths: 1. death of Renee Abima Obama – 3 months old, birth and death were reported in Springfield MD. Was there a doctor in ATTENDANCE, who reported her death? Coroner? 2. Was there any doctor, who recorded death of Madelyn Payne Dunham? Is there a coroner’s report? 3.Was there a doctor present when Stanley Ann Dunham died? Is there a death certificate signed by a doctor in attendance? coroner’s report? http://www.orlytaitzesq.com

Levitator scribbled: Regarding Renee L. Abema Obama (note the “L” in the name.) October 24, 2009 Over a year ago, Renee Lee Abena Obama was written about in the "Three Stooges Go To Washington" by Don Nicoloff. The most shocking discovery about BHO was hidden within David Obama’s “relatives” list and it casts a very dark occult shadow on BHO. The name “Renee Abena Obama” appeared. Who is Renee Abena Obama? Actually, the proper question is, “Who was Renee L. Abena Obama?” An exhaustive search revealed the birth of a baby girl named Renee L. Abena Obama on October 31, 2004. The infant died less than two months later on December 25, 2004. Young infants frequently die from congenital complications, though the death was not reported by any hospital in the State of Maryland, but by a funeral home (indicated by the SSDI code “72″). BHO’s biographies do not report the death of an infant in 2004, yet here was a baby girl who bore his last name—and the initial of his grandmother’s middle name—Madelyn “Lee” Dunham. A search of the Social Security Death Index produced “No Results,” though a genealogical index at WorldVitalRecords.com produced a Social Security number: “215-71-0752.” Entering the number directly into a search revealed its owner: Name: Renee L Abena Obama Birth Date: 31 October 2004 (Historical Events) Death Date: 25 December 2004 (Historical Events) Issuing State: Maryland SSN: 215-71-0752 A subsequent review of birth and death dates of the Dunham family revealed a startling coincidence—Ralph Waldo Emerson Dunham (BHO’s maternal great-grandfather) was born on December 25, 1894—exactly 110 years before Renee’s death. Renee was born under strange circumstances. Her death at age two months was strangely reported with almost no details memorialized in the public record. For those tracking SS# The Three Stooges article talked about all of these multiple SS#s, addresses, identities etc as well. Did you know this – “Getting back to Stanley Ann, the birth date of “Kelly Ann Dunham” is listed as November 8, 1964. Stanley Ann is purported to have died on “November 7, 1995. The next day, “Kelly Ann” was “born,” though the year is obviously modified to account for her being an adult. A search of the Social Security Death Index produces “No Results” with the name and S.S. number “079-52-7004,” (the number given to Stanley Ann) so the birth/death record is also fictitious. However, the number entry alone does produce a record with her name.

Levitator scribbled: Pig Book "Oinkers" of 2009 Recognizing Dogged Perseverance in the Mad Pursuit of Pork http://www.cagw.org/site/PageServer?p... The Log Rolling Award for $4.5 million in wood utilization research in 10 states by 19 senators and 10 representatives. The Porky Le Pew Award to Senator Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) for $1.8 million in swine odor and manure management research in Ames Iowa. The Narcissist Award to Senator Senator Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) for $2 million for the Pat Roberts Intelligence Scholars Program. The Taxpayers Get Tattooed Award to Representative Howard Berman (D-Calif.) for $200,000 for a tattoo removal program. Pork: The Final Frontier Award to Representatives Danny Davis (D-Ill.) and Jesse Jackson, Jr. (D-Ill.), and then-Representative Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.) for $900,000 for the Adler Planetarium and Astronomy Museum in Chicago. The When Alternate Pigs Fly Award for $465 million for the Joint Strike Fighter alternative engine. The Dim Bulb Award to Michigan Senators Carl Levin (D) and Debbie Stabenow (D), and Representative Carolyn Kirkpatrick (D) for $951,500 for downtown Detroit energy efficient street lamps. The Mighty Windbag Award to Representative Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) for $47,575 for the Harlem United wind power project. The Pork-a-saurus Award to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) for $143,000 for the Las Vegas Museum of Natural History. The Super Thad Award to Senator Thad Cochran (R-Miss.) for $653 million in total pork. The Taxpayers Get Shelled Award to Alabama Senators Richard Shelby (R) and Jeff Sessions (R), then-Representative Terry Everett (R), Representative Mike Rogers (R) for $413,000 for tri-state joint peanut research. The Highway Robbery Award to Senator Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) for $9.5 million for Corridor H. The Tour de Pork Award for $9.4 million for 14 projects for bike paths and trails. The Water Taxi to Nowhere Award to then-Representative Chris Shays for $1.9 million for the Pleasure Beach water taxi service project.

Levitator scribbled: On Thursday, the Federal Communications Commission will consider “a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on policies to preserve the open Internet.” That’s a long way of saying that the FCC, led by Julius Genachowski, Obama’s old friend from Harvard Law School, will take its first steps towards forcing through net neutrality, a controversial policy that critics say would amount to a government takeover of the internet. Internet Service Providers—the ones who have actually invested in the architecture and infrastructure that enables us all to access the internet—have long been opposed to net neutrality, as have conservatives and libertarians concerned about maintaining free markets and promoting innovation and quality service. But, with concerns that the FCC might now act to push net neutrality through, some voices less traditionally associated with opposition to the policy are speaking out regarding the proposed rulemaking, too. In fact, a number of Democrats and groups typically aligned with the left—the online component of which has long treated net neutrality as a top three policy objective—seem to be feeling less than warm and fuzzy about increased government intervention with regard to the internet. Those groups include the Communications Workers of America labor union, which in a letter to Chairman Genachowski from Thursday, raised concerns regarding the impact that the FCC’s rulemaking could have on job creation at a time of 10 percent unemployment. Groups like the Asian American Justice Center, National Council of La Raza, the League of United Latin American Citizens and the National Urban League, keen to avoid a widening of the “digital divide,” also voiced concerns in a letter to the FCC dated October 13. Democratic Governors, including Arkansas Gov. Mike Beebe and North Carolina Gov. Beverly Perdue, have urged caution with regard to the issue. Meanwhile, Oklahoma’s Democratic Gov. Brad Henry wrote to Genachowski earlier this month to tout the positive effects of his state’s model of “light or no regulation for landline, broadband and wireless services.” Last Thursday, 72 Democratic members of the House of Representatives, also in a letter to Genachowski, wrote that “it is our strong belief that continued progress in expanding the reach and capabilities of broadband networks will require the Commission to reiterate, and not repudiate, its historic commitment to competition, private investment and a restrained regulatory approach.” A restrained regulatory approach net neutrality would not be, of course. Opponents of the policy rightly argue that its implementation would stifle innovation and impact service—a little bit the way that a government takeover of health care would with regard to that industry. Also like health care, the internet is something that most Americans are unable and unwilling to go without. 10/19/09 http://biggovernment.com/

Levitator scribbled: IMPORTANT: Jane Burgermeister points out that the Flu outbreak we had in May was declared a level 5 pandemic by WHO and the US govt.. (When two or more countries are involved, that makes it a level 5.)

Levitator scribbled: A blogger found the following article in the Archives of the East-African STANDARD Sunday, June 27, 2004 Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.

Levitator scribbled: Important, help in research needed: WHO IS BARACK OBAMA and WHAT IS HE HIDING? October 19, 2009 I am trying to ascertain what happened to this individual, who was born in 1890 in CT, received his SS number in CT between 1977-1979 (probably he needed it for some SS benefits or medicaid benefits in his older age) , and whose SS# Obama used most of his life. We already know that another SS# Obama used 485-40-5154 was issued in IA to Lucille Ballantyne, born 12.22.1912, deceased 09.13.1998. Last residence was at 50140 Lamoni, Decatar, IA. Does anyone know where did she die, how? I am deeply concerned, what happened to the person whose SS# Obama used in MA, Chicago and currently using in DC? This person (could have been a man or woman) was born in 1890 and would’ve been 119 years old today. Since we don’t know of any 119 y.olds in this country, it is safe to assume this person is deceased. I am greatly alarmed, why isn’t he noted as deceased in the National databases. Why is Obama using his SS# with such unbelievable arrogance? Does he know how this person died? Is he sure for some reason that no one will be reporting his death today or tomorrow? I need more info on other deaths: 1. death of Renee Abima Obama – 3 months old, birth and death were reported in Springfield MD. Was there a doctor in ATTENDANCE, who reported her death? Coroner? 2. Was there any doctor, who recorded death of Madelyn Payne Dunham? Is there a coroner’s report? 3.Was there a doctor present when Stanley Ann Dunham died? Is there a death certificate signed by a doctor in attendance? coroner’s report? http://www.orlytaitzesq.com

Levitator scribbled: Honolulu Advertiser page scrubbed from Chicago or D.C.? Friday, October 16, 2009 3:08 AM Hours after The Post & Email highlighted the Games being played on the Internet by Google by John Charlton (Oct. 16, 2009) — Sometime before 2 AM Eastern Time, October 16th, someone changed the Honolulu Advertiser page, to which The Post & Email had linked, and through which link more than 400 visitors arrived at the newspapers’ site. That article, of January 8, 2008, as of yesterday had stated that Duckworth and Obama were both born overseas; now all reference to foreign birth, even for Duckworth, who publically admits being born in Thailand, has been scrubbed! You cannot hide a scrub, even if a scrub hides what you wanted to conceal from history. You always leave a trace. And this time The Post & Email will document it. The Honolulu Advertiser is Dishonest A reader of The Post & Email was “witness” to the crime against History; he posts his comment early this morning, of Oct. 16, 2009, at 2:10 AM: Ben: on October 16, 2009 at 2:10 AM Ace said: ———————————– Read the following article very carefully! http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/art... ———————————– There is a line of text that has been scrubbed from that article. It stated: ” Duckworth is happy to point out that she and Hawai’i-raised Punahou graduate Obama have “a kama’aina connection.” Both were born outside the country — Obama in Indonesia, Duckworth in Thailand — and graduated from high school in Honolulu — Punahou and McKinley, respectively.” You can read my response to Ben, in the comment cited. In short, the Blue text was not there yesterday when I wrote my articles; but the Greeen text and Blue text have both disappeared as of today. (Boldface and coloring in Ben’s comments were added for clarification) From the time stamp on Ben’s comment, it was before 2 AM Eastern Time, Oct. 16, 2009. The question is, who changed the page? The Advertiser, or someone working from Chicago or D.C.? Why the change was made is obvious: the information contained was proof that Obama has changed his birth story. No amount of obfuscation or scrubbing can now hide that fact. Obama supporters can decry that journalists make errors; but they should also decry when they hide inconvenient verbiage that they uttered in the past, when it does not suit their present political agenda. That’s 1984, not the U.S.A.. However, the scrub does proves once again, what The Post & Email documented yesterday, that Obama’s birth story is in continual evolution, and that his supporters are actively rewritting history to catchup with is lies. For that, The Post & Email can publically thank The Honolulu Advertiser. You attempted to hide what you ended up confirming. http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/

Levitator scribbled: Actual order from judge Carter: Barnett et al v Obama et al is going to trial, dates are final, January 26 is the date for the jury trial UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL CV-90 (12/02) CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL Page 1 of 1 Case No. SACV09-0082 DOC (ANx) Date October 5, 2009 Title CAPTAIN PAMELA BARNETT, ET AL. V. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ET AL. Present: The Honorable David O. Carter, U.S. District Judge Kristee Hopkins Debbie Gale N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Orly Taitz Gary Kreep David DeJute, AUSA Roger West, AUSA Proceedings: 1. MOTION BY DEFENDANTS TO DISMISS CASE 2. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Cause called and counsel state their appearances. Argument by counsel. Motion taken under submission. On September 8, 2009, the Court previously set tentative case management dates. The Court now orders those dates be made final. Case Management dates are as follows: Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing December 7, 2009, at 8:30 a.m. File Motion for Summary Judgment November 16, 2009 Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment November 26, 2009 Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment November 30, 2009 Final Pretrial Conference January 11, 2010, at 8:30 a.m. Jury Trial January 26, 2010, at 8:30 a.m. 10-7-2009

Levitator scribbled: Published in The Lancet, Jan 31, 2009, Dr. Emanuel's 'Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions' advocate a new "Complete Lives System" for selecting which sections of the population should be killed. He stated infants and seniors are " expendable ". Though, written in the lifeless academic language, Emanuel's discourse most closely resembles one of Adolf Hitler's rambling pronouncements as know-it-all Fuehrer. Emanuel sums up who is to be treated, and who is to die: "When implemented, the complete lives system produces a priority curve on which individuals aged between roughly 15 and 40 years get the most substantial chance, whereas the youngest and oldest people get chances that are attenuated." This may be justified by public opinion, since "broad consensus favours adolescents over very young infants, and young adults over very elderly people." Emanuel decrees that we must not kill only the elderly, but also infants. "Strict youngest-first allocation directs scarce resources predominantly to infants. This approach seems incorrect. The death of a 20-year-old woman is intuitively worse than that of a 2-month-old girl, even though the baby has had less life. The 20-year-old has a much more developed personality than the infant, and has drawn upon the investment of others to begin as-yet-unfulfilled projects.... Adolescents have received substantial substantial education and parental care, investments that will be wasted without a complete life. Infants, by contrast, have not yet received these investments.... It is terrible when an infant dies, but worse, most people think, when a three-year-old child dies, and worse still when an adolescent does." He proclaims his new "Complete Lives System" to be an advance over previous death-selection systems such as Quality-Adjusted Life Years and Disability-Adjusted Life Years.

Levitator scribbled: S. 773: The Cybersecurity Act of 2009. We are all doomed IF IT PASS. All we have left are the Radio and the iInternet. They want to impose Fairness Doctrine to control dissemination of information from talk shows. Now, they want to Take Over & Control the internet. Now days, there is no end to bad news from the Government. Its obvious that Obama wants to CONTROL every aspect of our lives. There's a new bill out there,the Cybersecurity Act of 2009. It is introduced by Senators Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) and Olympia Snowe (D-ME). The bill as it exists now risks giving the federal government UNPRECEDENTED POWER over the Internet without necessarily improving security in the ways that matter most. It should be opposed or radically amended. PLEASE READ IT. it's Nonesense. It is TYRANNICAL! It is Communist. It is very Scary! it's an infringement on our Freedoms. For instance: >The president may declare a cybersecurity emergency and order the limitation or shutdown of Internet traffic to and from any compromised Federal Government or United States critical infrastructure information system or network; And.... >The Secretary of Commerce— shall have access to all relevant data concerning (critical infrastructure) networks without regard to any provision of law, regulation, rule, or policy restricting such access… This bill, clearly, needs to be either radically changed, or strongly opposed, or we are all doomed.

Levitator scribbled: Steve Poizner Wins First Debate With Meg Whitman >>Steve Poizner and Meg Whitman appeared on CNBC's "The Kudlow Report" on back-to-back nights, the closest comparison yet for voters waiting for Meg Whitman to debate with California Insurance Commissioner and Republican candidate for Governor Steve Poizner. Following the first "virtual debate" of the 2010 gubernatorial election, Larry Kudlow declared Steve Poizner the WINNER. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPGghv... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=un078W... http://www.youtube.com/user/stevepoizner >>Following back-to-back interviews with California gubernatorial candidates Steve Poizner and Meg Whitman, CNBC's Larry Kudlow said on his radio show that Commissioner Poizner "really, really impressed me." TRANSCRIPT: LARRY KUDLOW: "But of the two, it was Poizner that really, really impressed me because he has a real supply-side, Art Laffer curve tax cutting program. This guy wants a 10 percent tax cut across the board: individuals, corporations, the sales tax, and a 50 percent capital gains tax cut. Really impressive guy who really has the growth argument down pat. He says growth is the key to reviving the sick California economy and budget. And I think the guy is dead right." (WABC's "Larry Kudlow Show," 9/19/09) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQMDiL...