Modular Learning EnvironmentsPage 3© MKThink 2004. Reproduction prohibited without permission.
The Market
Expenditures on modular trailers on college campuses in the U.S.exceed $350 million per year (Figure 2). By way of comparison,this equals 15 percent of all new library book purchases and15 percent of all spending on additions to existing buildings. Anadditional $1.65 billion per year is spent on modular units for K-12 schools, for a total annual expenditure of $2 billion (Figure 2)
.
Life-Cycle Costs
While modular units have a life-cycle that may be consideredhalf that of ‘traditional’ or ‘permanent’ construction, their costs onaverage are only 25 percent or less of the traditional facilities’construction costs and 15-20 percent of the total project costs ofa permanent facility. It is clear that both K-12 and postsecondaryinstitutions rely on these savings.
Longevity
Modulars aren’t intended to be long-term solutions for temporaryspace needs. According to our research, however, 76.5 percentof facilities planners who intended to use them for the short termended up using them longer then expected. Over 79 percent ofrespondents reported using modular classrooms for longer than 2 years.
Quality
Our original hypothesis was that modular classrooms fail astemporary space solutions. In fact, according to our survey,these units are filling the gap for both K-12 and postsecondaryeducational institutions. But the standard unit provided is of thelowest common denominator. Typical modular classrooms arestructurally inferior, particularly susceptible to earthquakes andhurricanes. Students in modular units often suffer from poor airquality due to improper ventilation and higher levels of exposureto toxins. Finally, temporary units are ugly—priorities of time andcost-savings win out over aesthetics, leading to what Ken Tannerterms ‘slum architecture.’ Thus, significant opportunities to provideanything more than basic enclosure are missed.
Use
Modulars are typically used for people-centered activities, likeclassrooms and offices. Seventy percent of those surveyed usedmodular units for both classrooms and offices. Most units areunder 1600 sf, and when configured for instructional space,many (35.7 percent) provide 21-35 seats. As such, they are highoccupancy spaces in which environmental and aesthetic issuesshould be of central concern.
Satisfaction Levels
While most university facility planners surveyed were satisfiedwith modulars across a range of features, none were verysatisfied with any particular feature. Modulars are thus consideredadequate, but not excellent, in any particular category. Theyserve a need, but because no other alternatives exist, plannerssettle for them as mediocre temporary space solutions.In addition, a large gap exists between the planners’ and theend users’ perspectives. According to our findings, 75 percent ofplanners feel modulars serve the educational goals for which theywere deployed. In contrast, 60 percent of faculty avoids modularclassrooms (when given a choice) for aesthetic, environmental,and functional reasons.
Portable UnitsStudents listen to a lecture in a trailer
Leave a Comment