© MKThink 2009. Reproduction prohibited without permission.Integrated PlanningPage 2
Integrated Planning: Streamlining Success
Institutional planning processes are always under scrutiny, andnew models are often heralded with great anticipation as theultimate solution to the frustrations and wasted resources thoughtto be caused by previous models. The most recent evolution inplanning theory, Integrated Planning, stresses the synergistic valuegained by bringing academic, financial, and campus and facilityplanning together. By focusing on value (as demonstrated byoutcomes, experiences, and costs), encouraging cross-functionalparticipation, providing frequent feedback, combining analyticsand alignment, and measuring performance and improvement,integrated planning is an excellent tool for strategic visionaries atany institution.While working with a number of leading college and universityclients, MKThink observed that even the best integrated planningprocesses failed to consistently achieve their desired results. Bycomparing integrated planning efforts that were successful withthose that were not, MKThink discovered that the addition ofthree essential ingredients to the integrated planning process, or,in fact, any planning process, is the key to reliably accomplishingplanning goals and realizing even the loftiest of visions.
ESSENTIAL INGREDIENTSStrategic Guidance.
The first essential ingredient is StrategicGuidance. After reviewing the school’s foundational valuesand finding inspiration in the mission, vision, and positioningstatements of the university, university leadership must definetwo elements of Strategic Guidance: Guiding Principles andBoundaries. The Guiding Principles define the project’s strategicintention and core values in language that is specific andmeasurable. Boundaries are non-negotiable directives thatgive players a comprehensive understanding of the playingfield; boundaries include both internal limits, such as numberof students admitted each year, and external limits, such asallowable density according to city zoning, for example.Together, Guiding Principles and Boundaries establish actionablecriteria for planning decisions and set the overall direction of theplanning process.
Active Integration
is the second essential ingredient. The activepart of this concept is critical. Looking at the definition of active,four terms are highlighted to illustrate that active integrationrequires the ongoing energy and participation of a dynamicgroup of people – it’s not merely a change in an organizationalchart or a single meeting bringing all groups to the table. Saidanother way, integration won’t happen on its own; it requiresthe commitment of a group or an individual to keep weaving theintegration conversation and associated activities throughout theentire process. The active integration team is like a hummingbirdgoing from fl ower to fl ower: they check in with all groups and“pollinate” each group with the ideas and insights of the othergroups, ensuring that each group involved is aware of everycomponent of the project scope and is enabled to shape theirparticular content contribution to synergistically support thewhole.The Active Integration team or individual needs to possess theability to act and think in a way that is at once strategic, intuitiveand grounded in reality. Practically speaking, this means the
Figure 1: Outside forces can continually derail plan implementationFigure 2: Typical Integrated Planning Process
Leave a Comment