Comment on Barack Obama's New Energy Plan For America
Posted on August 6, 2008

hi:) Well..no need to be dancingrabbits really. In fact, concept implementation means no real impact on the lives/activities of people in any way...except having more abundantly available electricity. It does mean electrical fuel cells become a faster reality, and that every govt ínstallation' means clean,high output electricity everyday whether its sunny or not, and whether there is wind or no wind. Electric vehicles are a really fast viability, when OIL is not really required to create the electricity that eventually affects daily charging. It means that industry has loads more electricity cleanly and affordably, removing the high cost of energy making output,and products more efficient and affordable. Remember - from your mobile charger, to turning on a light ..somewhere..OIL or coal is burning.If you pen out every offshoot of oil use, it will scare you. Most just think its about petroleum, and how many miles u get to travel ...but massive amounts burn to create electricity too. If you look at wind power..its being pushed down the throats of nations with its astronomical cost, but nicely disguised áctual outputs' - Im talking here about 'windfarms'. The truths about opera...

Comment on Barack Obama's New Energy Plan For America
Posted on August 6, 2008

I offered a concept, that by implementation will systematically reduce oil dependance by 30-50%. In basis, biofuels will be unnecessary because that eats up a food source. Although it is supplemental like other methods,it will produce more electricity than wind/solar/biofuels combined. I even tried contacting Mr Pickens via his plan site..BP etc..He does seem to be off on his own buzz expanding his losses in wind power, because I got no response there either.I sent the Obama campaign site a note too..but didnt get any 'Yes We CAN!' I got the usual type state dept equivalent of a 'Yes we can autorespond' So - are govts really serious ? I dont think so. Stacks of airtime is devoted to useless debates by supposed professors and experts all telling us where we'll be, and how a change is necessary, but if a global proactive solution more powerful than wind or solar is given, its somehow ignored. Even a note to the UN got zero response. So...is what is only currently known being pushed to line the pockets of a few?? Wind Power has some benefits in limited ways..but being hyped as the grail?? Why is that? I offered a concept that by implementation outputs more than 1000X the powe...