First, we should all recognize that the monetary use of gold is not without itsflaws, no system can possibly be considered perfect due to the interactions ofhuman beings and the unforeseen consequences of their actions. However, theprimary flaw with all fiat monetary systems is that they always fall intomismanagement and abuse by those who manage the system due to the nature of thesystem itself. Every attempt at stabilizing fiat money is usually short-lived,because by its very nature the entire system must rely upon a consistent expansionof the money supply to continue economic growth. This major flaw, combined withmismanagement, will always end in the destruction of the monetary system, thereare no exceptions.Now equally, a gold specie system, administered by a central bank or under theheavy control of the government is not much more successful than a fiat systembecause of the simple reason that it can easily be abandoned by a stroke of thepen. The most successful monetary system would be one in which individual banks ofissue not only had the fiduciary responsibility of good business practices, butalso they would not have the ability to renege on the promises and demands of thatresponsibility to their depositors. Not only would this provide a much longerstability of prices, but also, as witnessed in history, a much more stableeconomy.It has empirically been shown that the tendency of inflation usually persist underall fiat monetary systems, but not under what could be considered a classical goldmonetary system where, through private banking, the promises of redemption areenforced by the sheer demand of the public. In order for the public to haveconfidence in such a system, it would, as always, have to have a crediblecommitment from the banks to maintain gold redemption of any bills of issue, andthat any breach of this contract would not simply be dismissed as it appears underour current fiat monetary system. Now, this does not preclude the fact that banksare businesses, and mismanaged businesses do fail and should always be allowed tofail. That being said, such businesses should always provide for independentaudits and publication of the findings of such audits to the public, especially tothe depositors.While I personally defend the use of gold as a monetary necessity, I do not defendit on purely ideological [i.e. Constitutional] grounds, but also on rationalgrounds as well. It is a very rational monetary system; it requires absoluteresponsibility on all parties, especially the government. Unlike fiat money, goldis not, nor can it ever be an inherent liability; by its very nature it is anasset.Today, we are accustom to and therefore inclined to think of gold in terms of fiatevaluation. We look at the fiat price of gold and therefore assume that it is theactual value of gold when it fact it is merely the fait price that reflects theinflated, therefore debased purchase value of our fiat currency. Likewise, ourentire economy is calculated in fiat terms, logically because at this time that isall we have, however, it is important to realize that the entire economy is basedupon a debased evaluation. In other words, the evaluation of our economy should berecognized in highly inflated terms, therefore the real economy minus thisinflation is substantially less than it appears in the numbers. I realize that isdifficult for some to wrap their minds around, but if you view the economy interms of a 1913 100 cent Dollar you will get the real economic evaluation. Thereason for this is that since our money has lost the majority of its economicpurchase power over the last 95 years, the economic evaluation is based upon farless purchasing power per dollar of value.Take, for instance, $1Million Dollars in today's fiat evaluation, under a 1913,100 cent Dollar evaluation that $1Million Dollars would equate to only $45,007.36
Leave a Comment
i believe you are right on the money. i just wish there was a realistic way we could throw off the corrupt buggers... certainly not through the vote.