• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • 1
    CommentGo Back
 
The Bloodline of Tyranny can be traced back in this country to a mentality thatformed within the circles of power that began to consolidate during theConstitutional Convention. Within those debates the desire for a federal oligarchywas planted, then pruned back, yet the roots of that desire remained, living deepwithin the soil, ready to sprout and spread its vile contempt for the Liberty ofthe People. This seed of Tyrannical Oligarchy can be easily traced through variouspolitical policies and actions from the beginning until this present time.There were several distinctions between the two groups, the two mind-sets; it isno different today as this struggle continues for our Liberty. The mind-set ofoligarchy has not changed, nor have those who support such mentalities, nor hasthe battle that began during those formative years of our Republic.It became evident that there were two very different rationales at work; onequickly became represented by the Federalist Party on one side, the other by theRepublican-Democratic Party. While it is not my intent to delve into a detailedhistory of the beginning of this struggle, it will provide profiles of the men andthe reasons behind the formation of those two very different camps of politicalthought and how we are still effected today as the same struggle continues.While it became apparent during the Constitutional Convention that there werethose who saw the opportunity to establish Imperial Government, the forces againstthem, thankfully, were substantial. Eventually however, the great AmericanMonarchists represented by the Federalist Party gained power and the greatstruggle for the future of our Republic began in earnest in 1796 with the electionof John Adams. The Federalist Party's platform favored a highly centralizedgovernment and extremely strong Executive without the checks and balances tohinder or limit its power or scope. It was, in a very real sense, a Party ofMonarchy whereas the Republican-Democratic Party was totally opposite, seeking avery decentralized government with checks and balances to limit the reach ofgovernment into the lives of the People.As the critical formation of the Republic began, Hamilton laid eleven proposals atthe Constitutional Convention of 1787 in which he sought to base the government ofthe Republic on, these propositions were so Monarchist in tone and substance thatthey received little support except from those of the New England States and wererejected. Governor Morris, a friend of Hamilton stated: " Hamilton hatedRepublican Government, and never failed on every occasion to advocate theexcellence of and avow his attachment to a Monarchic form of Government."From the very beginning of this country, the Federalist, particularly in NewEngland, nurtured and maintained a pure hatred and fear of the ideals theRepublic. While at one time Hamilton was a champion of those ideals, he soonbecame the leader of this group that espoused a Monarchist Oligarchy. In hisopposition to Jefferson, he railed out "The People! Gentlemen, I tell you thepeople are a great beast!"The hatred was so intense that during the 1796 elections, Governor Walcott ofConnecticut stated: "I sincerely declare that I wish the Northern States wouldseparate from the Southern the moment that event [the election of Jefferson] shalltake place."The Federalist Party desired to either completely separate from the SouthernStates or form their own Confederacy of Northern States, or to completely destroyany and all power within the South and along with it all traces of Jeffersonianprinciples from the government. This desire never, ever changed through thehistory or the transformation of the Federalist Party, as it became the Whig Partyand then the Republican Party.
 
As the Federalists began to wield their powers under the Administration of JohnAdams, the first tinge of evidence to the desire and purpose of the Oligarchistwas the Aliens and Seditions Act of 1798, which provided a singular reservoir ofpower in the hands of the President and allow him to expel foreign citizenssuspected of treason. Additionally, it made it illegal to oppose any measure ofthe government and any false or perceived hostile words against the government orits policies.Thankfully, there was waiting in the defense of our Republic two men and twoStates that stood in the gap to defy these Monarchist who craved an AmericanOligarchy with an unquenchable lust that has continued throughout the history ofour fair Land. Those men, of course, were Thomas Jefferson and James Madison andthose courageous State Republics were Virginia and Kentucky.After the death of Jefferson, the Republican-Democratic Party dropped Republicanfrom the name and the Democratic Party was born and remained the Party ofJefferson and Madison until it was completely destroyed by the Reconstruction Act.The Federalist Party fought from 1796 until it's apparent demise at the end of theWar of 1812, but the Centralist Ideals found their way back into the politicalarena with the formation of the Whig Party, which once again sought to transformthis Republic into a Centralized Oligarchy. The old Federalists and Whigsideologies basically united and organized, taking on a name that when used wouldbe deceptively favorable to the public. The heart of the Party still contained allof its progenitors' creeds, doctrines, hatred and purpose. It had and continues tohave a passionate desire for power and will use any necessary means to acquire itsend.As we know, the Republican Party effectively consumed that Party, but as it wastransformed its platform was increasingly radicalized during the late 1850's andduring the 1860's. Nevertheless, the Republican Party, the GOP is the inheritor ofall the Centralist Ideals, the Monarchist Principles of the Federalist Party andthe Whig Party before it. The Bloodline of Tyranny had been effectively passedfrom one generation to the next and it was this fateful generation of Centraliststhat saw the beginning of the fulfillment of all the desires of its progenitorMonarchists in our country's birth.Make no mistake about it, the Republican Party today is the Party of Lincoln, butthe Democratic Party today is definitely not the Party of Jefferson.In the St. Louis Globe-Democrat issue of March 6, 1898, which by the way was avery strong advocate of Hamiltonian strong centralized government doctrine madethis interesting editorial:"The resemblance between Hamilton and Lincoln is so close no one can resist it.Hamilton is dwarfed by no man. A just parallel of Hamilton and Lincoln will showthem alike in many ways. They were alike almost to the point of identity.Hamilton’s work made Lincoln’s possible."It is astounding to see that prior to Lincoln’s election as President, he spoke of"democracy" and with the clever affectation of great esteem for Jeffersonianprinciples; that of course quickly changed when be came to power.A few years later, the same Globe-Democrat published the following:"Lincoln, Grant and the Union armies gave a victory to Hamiltonian (Monarchy) whenit subjugated the Confederates (Jeffersonian democrats) in the South. [This isstrictly true; it was a victory over Democracy by Monarchy,] The cardinal
 
doctrines of Democracy are the enlargement of the power of the States. All theprodigious energies of the war could not extinguish these. [The States] The lessonof the war was extreme and extraordinary, and yet in a sense ineffective."Of course, it was not the desire of those who follow the principles of Jeffersonto increase the power of the States; it was only to preserve the Constitutionaldelegations of power and authority that the federal government of Lincoln desiredto eliminate in favor of Centrally Nationalized Government. Make no mistake aboutit, the push of the Party of Lincoln was intended to expand the power of theExecutive; recently we have seen a similar push by the Bush-Cheney Administrationin their doctrine of the Unitary Executive.The policies of Lincoln and later the forces that followed his lead in theReconstruction Act sought to absolutely crush the last drop of life from thebattered ideals of the Democratic Principles of the Republic, especially in theSouth. Statists, Monarchist and Nationalist all seem to be ignorant of the natureof Liberty, they fail to understand that even with all the might and power of atyrannical standing army, the Light of Liberty cannot be extinguished.Once again, I quote from the Globe-Democrat paper as to the real cause of the war,which, by the way, also reflected on the American Revolution: "If there was noabsurd sentiment about the privileges of the States there would be no campaign onimperialism…Back of all opposition to imperialism, whatever form it takes, is theold doctrine that the rights reserved by the Constitution to the States are beinginvaded."Basically, what the paper was saying was that had there been no "absurd sentiment’about Liberty and Freedom in 1776 then there would have been no campaign againstthe English King. They were, in effect, stating a very peculiar Hamiltonian-Lincolnite position that there should have never been a Declaration ofIndependence from Britain and that, like our Revolutionary Founders, thoseSouthern States seeking the same type of Independence from the Union, for many ofthe same reasons, caused the War by pressing their Constitutional Rights in theexact manner those Rights were structured and expressed in the Constitution.Now, if you trace the line of this heinous ideology, you will find a direct linagedown to the Republican Party. The hatred of the South and the Democratic Party ofJefferson continued, it never waned nor did its primary purpose in total controlover government weaken through the decades from 1796 to the fall of theConfederacy and beyond.In fact, if you read the works of Wendell Phillips, a New England RepublicanFirebrand, you will quickly learn the agenda of the Republican Party of Lincolnfrom the very beginning, it was keeping the flame of Oligarchy alive and wouldstop at nothing until it accomplished its vile goals of domination. WendellPhillips stated: "The Republican Party is in no sense a national party. It is aparty of the North, organized against the South." Why? The South, particularly theOld South that was recognized primarily as Virginia, Kentucky, the Carolinas andGeorgia, were all strongholds of the Jeffersonian Ideal for a Republic of, by andfor the People. The reality is that the war on the South didn't begin in the1860s, but back in 1796 with the Federalist Party, it was the offspring of thatParty, the Republican Party of Lincoln that finally accomplished the goals of theold Federalist Party.To get a very detailed expose on the agenda of this group and their long-termgoals you need not look any further than the Olive Branch published in 1814. Inthose papers you will find the following: " A Northern Confederacy has been theobjective for a number of years. They [the politicians of New England] have
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
Thomas-Jefferson

is reading My Declaration of Re-Independence, closely following my original Declaration due to history repeating itself, proposes a republican solution, given that democratic election of the President, Senators and Representatives has failed to stop abuses by national supremacists. It is available as a 4-page pamphlet at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/19316765/Th... .

reply09 / 01 / 2009
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...