254
C.
Dare and
C.
Lindsey
neednotcarry thesedisadvantages, if adequatemeasuresareaken.
Within the child mental health professions, constant pressure is necessaryin order o keep the needs of childrenat thecentre
of
interest. Thefundamental skills of makingcontactwithchildren andunderstanding
their inner worlds must be acquired.The present authors have drawn specific attention to the links betweencertain features of child psychotherapy and family therapy (Dare, 1975)and are engaged in developing a form of family therapy which is particu-larlyaimed at meeting the needs of families presentingwithyoung
children, including pre-school and young latency age groups.We have conducted preliminary research into the outcome of our formof family therapy (Northey, 1974) and reported clinical outcome findings(Dare
et al.,
1976). These results encourage us to believe, firstly, that ourinterventions are symptomatically effective for a wide range of present-ing childproblemsand secondly, that changeoccurs in basic psycho-
pathogenic processes in the family.In this paper are described our techniques of initiating children intofamily therapy, which whilst not strikingly different from that reportedby Ackerman (1966,
1970);
Satir 1964); Guttman (1975) and Zilbach
et al.
(1972), aredifferent rom the techniques ommonlyobservedemployed inGreat Britain and he
U.S.A.
The emphasis is upon heretention of amoreonsistenthildrientation throughout whole
family reatments. This does notresult n neglect of adultneeds butavoids
a
possible risk of family herapy, namely that of it becomingmarital therapy in the presence of the children.Furthermore, Northey’s study suggested that following treatment thereare improvements in marital harmony (shown by diminution in expressedhostility between parents). We have found, repeatedly, improvement inwhole ystem unctioning, in erms of openness of communication,increased mutual regard of the needs of others, equalization of attentionpaid to
all
the children, with reduction of scapegoating, as well as decreasein individual symptoms
of
anxiety, depression, psychosomatic states andsome disorders of conduct (see Tables
1
and 2).The theoreticalrameworkusedor the understanding of family
processes is derived from psychoanalytical conceptualizations of individualpsychological development, and interpersonal relations and from systemstheory. Systems theory and psychoanalytic views of the family are compli-mentary rather than antagonistic.
A
system cannot exist without trans-actional content and intrapsychic content
is
indubitably ordered by thestructured impingement of the external family system. Intergenerationalfactors show the continuous impact of the past on the present, both by
Leave a Comment