3inversion of their migratory balance due to the return of their emigrants to thehomeland, as well as to their sudden transformation into immigrant-receivingcountries.The most flagrant case of all seems to be Greece, which reaches rates of immigration comparable to those of Germany, all within a very short time span. Inaddition, to an incomparable extent with other countries of Southern Europe, Greecehas been subject to a distinct immigration impact: the collapse of the communistregimes in Eastern Europe, some of which share borders with Greece. In other words,contrary to the experience of Spain, Portugal and Italy, the vast majority of immigrants actually present in Greece come from former communist countries, whichare undergoing transitory processes in order to enter market economies; the principalflows come from a single country, Albania (Cavounidis, 2002: 45, 46).In this context, Greek cities, countryside and islands witness a considerableincrease in their populations related to the migrants’ arrival. As a result, they aretransformed by the adjunction of various populations and the modification of their ethno-socio-demographic structure, loosing, thus, their cultural “homogeneity”.Actors but at the same time witnesses to these evolutions, Albanianimmigrants trace different pathways and numerous trajectories within the Greek territory. Having arrived principally in 1991, but also in 1997 after the bank crisis inAlbania, they seem to want to stay in Greece, if not for a lifetime, at least for the long-term. Therefore, their migrations persist; the Albanian community
1
in Greece is
1
We would do better to refer to Albanian “communities” instead of one “community”. Theuse of the plural would then be justified by the fact that the characteristics of the Albanian immigrationin Greece, which depend primarily on the departure society in Albania, seem to be considerablydifferent to each other. In this way, it seems more appropriate to speak of “communities” instead of a
Commenting has been disabled.