forced not only the residents of poor communities to leave their native places, buteven some who were better off. Sometimes single families would head for newhabitations - for example, one family from the
vllaznija
(brotherhood - a kinship unitsmaller than the fis or the clan) of Kaçorraj left for Lura, another - for Milot. Theywere fleeing from their own
vllaznija
, and nobody knows anything about them inKaçorraj. Similarly, the northernmost territories were colonised by large groups of families of the clans of Kelmendi, Berisha, Shala, and others, who left the principalclan territories situated mainly in the central part of the northern region.
George Kastrioti-Skanderbeg's resistance to the Ottomans. Heroicity as part of the Albanianindividuality.
In 1924, a brilliant Bulgarian observer and connoisseur of Albania, gave the followingdescription of the Albanians: "…isn't the Albanian, who, being a slave, did not allowenslavement, freedom-loving? This is a question that could hardly be understood byanyone who has not lived in Albania. The most liberty-loving people in the Balkans isthe Albanian people. The Albanian, taken alone, as an individual, is an anarchist bynature. He would brook no bondage let alone on his people, he would not letanything, seen as possibly humiliating, befall his house. The Albanian house standsalone and apart from the rest… The Albanian, being very touchy and left with no lawenforcement, during long ages had been forced to defend his freedom and familyhonour with arms and so bear today the stigma of being a killer."
The political situation in Albania prior to the Ottoman invasion had been verycomplicated because of the high level of feudal partitioning of the country. Therewere several independent principalities ruled by the most powerful Albanian feudallords: of Durrës in Central Albania, ruled by Carlo Thopia; of despot Spat in Epirus; of the Balsha family in Northern Albania; of Theodore Muzaka of Berat, comprising thelands around Berat.In the 1430s the ruling circles in Constantinople, represented by Andronicus III and John Cantacuzenus were reconciled with the loss of Asia Minor to the numberless Turkic tribes and beyliks. The territory of the entire peninsula of Asia Minor was Turkicised and Islamised. It was there, on the ruins of the older political and culturalinstitutions, that the Muslims, the steppe peoples and tribal unions set up a new typeof polity and socioeconomic system.
The policy of the Byzantine rulers was directedto the strengthening of the Balkan positions of the empire, and the Muslim beyliks inAsia Minor were expected to contribute to its realisation.
With the help of mercenaries from Ayd?n, Andronicus III and John Cantacuzenus managed to conquerEpirus, Thessaly, and Southern Albania. From the Byzantine point of view, theactivation of the Balkan politics was the only move the empire could make in the1330s. In the Balkans perspective, however, such action involved the risk of aggravating the inter-Balkan relations, something particularly dangerous in the faceof a strong Asian enemy.
By the beginning of 1386 the lord of Yanina, the Florentine Esau Buondelmontideclared his vassalage to the Ottomans and confirmed it appearing in person in thetown of Edirne. In the same period, his southern neighbour and rival Albanian despotGjin Bua Spata, had to do the same. Until his death in 1400 despot Gjin Bua Spatamore than once resorted to Ottomans help in the wars he waged against the RhodesKnights Hospitallers, who at that time made efforts to gain a firm foothold in Lepantoand Corinth. Individual members of the Albanian clan of Muzaka also becameOttoman vassals.
Leave a Comment