Page 3
companies to be known as McGraw-Hill Markets and McGraw-Hill Education. The plan also includescommitments to significantly reduce overlapping corporate costs and to accelerate share repurchasestoward a total of $1 billion in 2011. The announcement closely followed our 13D filing of August 1st inwhich we disclosed a more than 5% MHP ownership stake and alluded to ongoing talks between us andMHP management. These developments represent another significant catalyst brought about by JANA’sactivist group in a situation bearing several similarities to the El Paso Corp. (EP) investment we discussedlast quarter.As with El Paso, we had followed McGraw-Hill for years before concluding that the time was right toinvest. While a break-up liberating MHP’s Standard & Poor’s unit had long been debated, it was not until
thisyear that we felt McGraw-Hill came to satisfy all of our “V
3
” requirements for success in active
shareholder engagement. To review, the elements of V
3
are:
•
Value
- After multi-year underperformance somewhat traceable to its inefficient corporate
structure, MHP traded at the valuation of its least desirable business (Education), representing a
sizeable discount to sum-of-the-parts valuations and offering an attractive shareholder return
irrespective of any event.•
Votes
- We confirmed that shareholder interest in a break-up plan had shifted materially during
the period of underperformance causing the MHP board to intensify its ongoing strategic
review. If it were to come to a vote or proxy battle, we felt confident in the outcome.
•
Variety of ways to win
- Even in an environment that includes litigation and regulatory
uncertainty over rating agencies, we saw many ways MHP could be restructured to unlock valueshort of the four-way break up we advocated initially. For instance, cost structure and balancesheet optimization can create significant value with or without a formal split.The fund began establishing a position in February of this year. We presented our own comprehensiveplan in person to CEO Harold “Terry” McGraw on August 22nd, and he welcomed the dialogue. Onceagain, in addition to our funds’ investment, our position was bolstered by an additional investment fromthe JANA Special Investment Fund and a co-investment from Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, lendingundeniable credence to the cause. Through our background work, we believe we discovered several valuedrivers not widely appreciated by the market, including the extent of redundant costs in the inefficientMHP structure that could be eliminated in a split. We also conducted a deep-dive analysis of potentialrating agency liabilities stemming from the financial crisis to gain better clarity on issues misunderstood
by many investors. Nevertheless, to protect against factors such as a decline in debt issuance and
potential sovereign retaliations, we initiated certain short positions against MHP which have so far addedto overall profits from the long position.
Since the September announcement we have continued a productive dialog with management over
specifics of the Growth and Value Plan. While we are pleased with the company’s announcements to date,there are multiple additional levers to unlocking even greater value at the company’s disposal, and
we will bewatching the company’s further comments and actions closely. Much more detail can be
found infollowing public documents:•
New York Times’ coverage of our 13D filing on August 1, 2011 ishere.•
JANA’s public Presentation to McGraw-Hill of August 22, 2011 ishere.•
McGraw-Hill’s September 11, 2011 announcement of the Growth and Value Plan ishere.
•
Absolute Return+Alpha Magazine,
JANA’s Turn of the Screw
, article reprint October 2011 is
here.
767 Fifth Avenue, 8
th
Floor, New York, NY 10153 Tel. 212-455-0900 / Fax 212-455-0901
Commenting has been disabled.