Several years ago, the City experienced a proliferation of medical marijuanacollectives throughout the City's commercial zones. As with many of the City'scommercial uses, several mebical marijuana collectives were esiablished in-close proximity to residentially zoned properties and sensitive land uses, such asschools, parks and places of religious worship Consequently, the City Counciltook a number of actions to limit the impact of medical marijuana collectives onthe community and it has adopted regulations governing the location andoperation of the facilitiesThe City, as did most cities, initially decided to regulate collectives through adiscretionary land use process;
I
e. by requiring a conditional use permit. Nowthat we have had some experience with the regulatory experience, staff believesthat there are some disadvantages to this approach. For example, a conditionaluse permit (CUP) runs with the land, meaning that once the CUP is issued for aparticular property, the use becomes vested, regardless of the ownership of thecollective. Staff believes it is undesirable to create such a right in any particularlocationBusiness licensing offers the City more regulatory tools to address the types ofconcerns that the collectives raise, but would not sacrifice any of therequirements that are currently in place through zoning regulation, indeed, aslong as the City maintains
a
cap on the number of collectives and locationrequirements that limit the possible locations for establishment of new collectives,the removal of the CUP requirement will have no real practical effectThis summer, the City Council directed staff to bring forward a business licenseordinance (Attachment A) that would regulate medical marijuana collectives withthe same requirements currently in the zoning code and to eliminate theregulations in the Zoning Ordinance. The Council also required that the newordinance contain language that addressed the cultivation of marijuana and arequirement that each collective have a compassion program for qualifyingpatientsStaff convened a meeting with the four permitted collectives to review theframework for the new regulations. At that meeting the collectives were insupport of the following requirements of the new regulations:Require criminal background checks on collective operatorsChange the nomenclature from medical marijuana "dispensary" to"collective"Require that collectives be organized as a nonprofit and be in compliancewith Proposition 215, California Health
&
Safety Code Section 11362
7
and California State Attorney General Guidelines for marijuana grown formedical useEstablish a limit on the total square footage of a collective; not to exceed
4,500
square feet
Leave a Comment