The Trinity is the central doctrine of today\u2019s Christian church. It claims that God exists in three \u2018persons\u2019, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. It is a lie. Its advocators don\u2019t know what they are talking

understand what they\u2019re talking about! These excerpts are taken from the New Bible Dictionary, and would be accepted by nearly any seminary trained scholar or pastor:

The doctrine (of the Trinity) is stated by saying that God is One in his essential being, but that in his being there are three Persons, yet so as not to form separate and distinct individuals.

Before there had been any created being, there was self-revelation within the Trinity, the Father revealing to the Son, the Father and the Son revealing to the Spirit, and the Spirit communicating that revelation within the Being of God.

In your own mind, decide whether or not the above doctrine qualifies as the \u2018knowledge\u2019 which Paul speaks of to Timothy in the next passage.

Was the previous definition for some attributes of the Trinity an idle babbling? Were there contradictions? Let me re-write the captions taken from the New Bible Dictionary, giving the English dictionary (all definitions taken from dictionary.com) definitions for a few of the words they use, in order to make their incoherent babble a little more understandable. You will find that what they have done is used a lot of words that most people do not understand the meanings of, and contradicted themselves time and time again, in order to explain an unexplainable truth.

(fundamental or necessary)being (that which exists in any form), (Thus we conclude that God\u2019s fundamental, or most basic, existence is guided by the fact that He is One. This is quite Biblically supported, as even Jesus Christ calls it the \u2018greatest of all commandments\u2019 in Mark 12:29)

(Thus we conclude that God, while in His basic state of existence is One, within that One existence are three sets of characteristics that make up 3 individuals, however God\u2019s existence does not actually form any distinct individuals--I\u2019d like to mention at this point that God is not the author of confusion; 1 Corinthians 14:33)

by a source)\u2019 perhaps to suggest uniqueness (being the only one of its kind) rather than derivation (to obtain or receive from a source)

(You see, in coming to the conclusion that \u2018only begotten\u2019 suggests uniqueness, not derivation, they only produce an answer for the \u2018only\u2019 part of \u2018only begotten\u2019. They forget the \u2018begotten\u2019 part, which in no way suggests uniqueness. However, the very word that they claim \u2018begotten\u2019 does not represent, derivation, has a nearly identical meaning to \u2018begotten\u2019. However, if they keep the meaning of \u2018begotten\u2019 as is, then Jesus can\u2019t be God, because he wouldn\u2019t be eternal. What the writers are inherently claiming, in order that their faith may not be wrong, is that God is extremely unskilled in His use of vocabulary--I\u2019d say about a third grade level, as He uses words which contain meanings that He obviously does not want to get across.)

the Father revealing to the Son, the Father and the Son revealing to the Spirit, and the Spirit communicating that revelation within the Being of God (What in the world does that even mean? The

\u2018Being of God\u2019? If the Father, Son AND Holy Spirit have already received the revelation from each other, what part of God is left to receive more?).

(Thus in recap, we understand that God exists fundamentally as One, but as three persons with individual characteristics, but not as three individuals, in a state where He does not understand the meaning of the words He created, and has found a way in which to reveal secret and unknown things to Himself between those three persons which are not individual from one another. And He knows everything. Oh, I get it let\u2019s worship Him!)

As if this were not enough confusion and non-Biblical babble, there is more! Take a look at a number of quotes, all from the beginning of titled sections, in the New Bible Dictionary explaining exactly how it is that we came to the \u2018wonderful and beautiful\u2019 revelation of the Trinity. Remember that the person who writes these things actuallybeli ev es in themyou won\u2019t think so as you read.

place formally in the theology of the church till the 4th century. It is, however, the distinctive and all-comprehensive doctrine of the Christian faith. (I\u2019m not sure I see his logic\u2026)

Though it is not a biblical doctrine in the sense that any formulation (to express in systematic terms or concepts) of it can be found in the Bible, it can be seen to underlie the revelation of God, implicit (implied or understood, though not directly

(Let me get this straight; it is not expressed using concepts in any way in the Bible, but it IS fully and clearly expressed. I have a question; how can you fully and clearly express something without using concepts? Only God can! In case you didn\u2019t get that, I\u2019m being sarcastic.

Although Scripture does not give us a formulated doctrine of the Trinity, it contains all the elements out of which theology has constructed the doctrine.(Just because alphabet soup has all

the letters, this does not mean we should attempt to read our soup. The fact of the matter is that the Bible contains the \u2018elements\u2019 to preach mass genocide, but unless the \u2018elements\u2019 are taken in the \u2018formula\u2019 that God uses, they are void.)