1 9 6
F.A .
L o r t g s t u f f ,A w n lin e u r
m odel of the term structure
o b s e rv e d
p ro p e rtie s
o f th e te rm
s tru c tu re .
F o r e x a m p le , it im p lie s th a t
te r m
p re m iu m s
a re
m o n o to n e
in c re a s in g fu n c tio n s
o f m a tu rity .
R e c e n t e v id e n c e
i n
th a t
a c tu a l
te r
c o m p lic a te d
p a tte rn s .
C le a rly , w e w o u ld lik e to b e a b le to a v o id th e s e lim ita tio
th e
a d v a n ta g e s
a n d
in tu itiv e
a p p e a l
o f th e C I
ro a c h
t o
m o d e lin g
the term
s tru c tu re .
One poss
u c e
a d d itio n a l
s ta te v a ria b le s in to th e a n a ly s is . U n fo rtu n a te ly ,
how ever,
p re a c h
i s
v e ry
tly
i n
term s
o f
tra c ta b ility
a n d
th e
num bers
o f
ttro n a l p a ra m e te rs
t
m u s t b e e s tim a te d .
p a p e r
in tro d u c e s
a sim pler and
m ore direct way
of addressing
th e s e
a llo w in g
te c h n o lo g ic a l
c h a n g e
t o
a ffe c t
p ro d u c tio n
re tu rn s
e d e riv e a n a lte rn a tiv e c lo s e d -fo rm
g e n e rA
e q u i!ib riu m
m odel of
re w ithin the C IR
(1 9 8 5 a j fra m e w o rk
in w h ic h d is c o u n t b o n d
n e a r
fu n c tio n s
o f th e
r is k - f r e e
in te re s t
ra te .
T h is
n o n h n e a r
d e p e n d e n c e
r e s u lts
in a richer set of yield
c u rv e
a n d
te r m
p re m iu m
s h a p e s
w ith o u t in tro d u c in g
a d d itio n a l s ta te v a ria b le s o r p a ra m e te rs .
F o r e x a m p le , th is
m odel
[d e s ig n a te d
th e
d o u b le
s q u a re
ro o t
(D S R )
m o d e l]
is c o n s is te n t
w ith
b c th
hum ps
a n d
tro u g h s
i n
th e
y ie ld
c u rv e
a s
w e ll a s
w ith
m o n o to n e
o r
p a tte rn s
of term
prem ium s.
1 new
a n d
su rp risin g fin d in g s e m e rg e fro m
th is n o n lin e a r
m o d e l. F o r
e x a m p le , w e s h o ? N th a t e q u ilib riu m
discount bond prices and
interest rates are
n o t
a lw a y s
in v e rs e ly
re la te d ;
th a t
d is c o u n t
b o n d
p ric e s
c a n
b e
in c re a s in g
fu n c tio n s
of the risk-free rate in som e situations. This property
h a s im p o rta n t
lic a tio n s
for t
in v e rtib ility
of bond
prices. In
a d d itio n ,
we show
th a t
rs c o u n t
b o n d
r i
n e s s
n e e d
n o t
b e
a
m o n o to n e
in c re a s in g
fu n c tio n
o f
m atu rity
o r d u ra tio n .
F in a lly , w e s h o w
th a t th e lo c a l e x p e c ta tio n s
h y p o th e s is
c a n h o ld s im u lta n e o u s ly
for som e bonds
a n d
not others.
m pirical
perform ance
o f
th e
S R
a n d
D SR
m o d e ls
i n
tructure, w e first use H ansen\u2019s (1982) generalized
m e th o d
) te c h n iq u e
t o
o b ta in
p o in t e s tim a te s
o f th e p a ra m e te rs
o f
then com pare
th e y ie ld s im p lie d
by each
m o d e l w ith
th e
actual yields on Treasury
b ills d u rin g
th e 1 9 6 4 -1 9 8 6 p e rio d
e show
th a t th e
e a n
s q u a re d
e rro r
th a n
th e
S R
m o d e l.
I n
el are m ore serially
c o rre la te d
a n d
m o re
y related
t o
th e
level of t> ie risk-free
ra te . F in a lly ,
w e test
th e
y ie ld
er changes
i n
th e
s q u a re
o n tro llin g
for changes
i n
ts strongly
s u p p o rt
th e h y p o th e s is
th a t
ree rat
Leave a Comment