You are seeing our new document Reader view. Click here to revert. Feel free to leave us feedback on this feature .
×
  • Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
 
News from the Rum River Watershed
Volume #1 Issue #3September 2005
 
Letter from the Editor
From 2001 to 2003 the Isanti County Environmental Coalition took it upon themselves to assessthe condition of what seemed to be a pristine wetland in one of our county parks. Manycommunity organizations, the Anoka Ramsey Community College/Cambridge Branch, the MNDept. of Natural Resources and the Initiative Foundation all leant a hand in enabling the study.Why was this study important? What did it have to do with the Rum River?Well, for one thing, the water flowing through this bog-like wetland, called a “fen,” eventuallyends up in the Rum River. This type of wetland has in recent years been thought to act like asponge, filtering out fertilizers and pesticides as they flow off of adjacent agricultural fields andurban areas before they move into other water systems. However, we saw signs that thesechemicals were having a negative impact on this wetland. Although still pristine, it was beingencroached upon by reed canary grass, an exotic plant from Europe once planted forpasturage, and also an indicator that the fen was becoming more “mineral rich.” A high qualityfen or bog tends to be “mineral poor.”Fertilizers, nutrients, pesticides, and other pollutants such as coliform bacteria, arsenic andmercury can become problems in our watersheds. What is the status of these agents in theRum River watershed? Where are they going to end up?Where do we stand now that the great city of New Orleans has been nearly blown off the map?Just a month ago the complaint from that region was about what has been coming down theMississippi River from the northern states and emptying into the Gulf of Mexico, creating a“dead zone.” This huge area has much lower marine animal and plant diversity and less plantand animal abundance than before man-made development occurred, and the dead zone hasbeen steadily expanding. The spoils of the storm from that city now seriously aggravate thatsituation. But the great river still flows through it. And the Rum River still flows into theMississippi. It is still our responsibility to tend to our end of the bargain, and minimize whatundesired impacts our activity in Minnesota may have on the system. And that is why in thisissue the aim will still be to try to answer the question: Is the Rum River (and its watershed)“impaired”? And if so, what can we do about it?
Contents:
 
Is the Rum River “impaired”? How about its watershed?
Mercury in our environment and how to control it
The Rum River watershed in Anoka County
Feature article by area hydrologist Mike Mueller: “Water Quality and Watersheds: Part 3”
To be addressed in our November issue:
What are some of the water resource issues in that obscure little country, Paraguay?Why care? What does this have to do with Minnesota?
Elaboration on efforts underway to form a “Friends of the Rum River” group in our area.
January issue: Creative Thinking in the Rum River Watershed
Mission/Vision Statements of NRRW
Adding/removing names from RumRiverWatershedNews@yahoo.com list serve
Sampling the vegetation of a fen in Isanti County 
    of 00

    Leave a Comment

    You must be to leave a comment.
    Submit
    Characters: ...
    You must be to leave a comment.
    Submit
    Characters: ...