Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Unavailable
    Masters and Commanders: How Four Titans Won the War in the West, 1941-1945
    Unavailable
    Masters and Commanders: How Four Titans Won the War in the West, 1941-1945
    Unavailable
    Masters and Commanders: How Four Titans Won the War in the West, 1941-1945
    Ebook1,119 pages21 hours

    Masters and Commanders: How Four Titans Won the War in the West, 1941-1945

    By Andrew Roberts

    4/5

    ()

    Currently unavailable

    Currently unavailable

    Listen to the audiobook instead

    About this ebook

    “Masterly. . . . Roberts’s portrait of the relationship between the four men who made Allied strategy through the war years is a triumph of vivid description, telling anecdotes, and informed analysis." —Max Hastings, The New York Review of Books

    An epic joint biography, Masters and Commanders explores the degree to which the course of the Second World War turned on the relationships and temperaments of four of the strongest personalities of the twentieth century: political masters Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt and the commanders of their armed forces, General Sir Alan Brooke and General George C. Marshall.

    Each was exceptionally tough-willed and strong-minded, and each was certain that only he knew best how to win the war. Andrew Roberts, "Britain's finest contemporary military historian" (The Economist), traces the mutual suspicion and admiration, the rebuffs and the charm, the often-explosive disagreements and wary reconciliations, and he helps us to appreciate the motives and imperatives of these key leaders as they worked tirelessly in the monumental struggle to destroy Nazism.

    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherHarperCollins
    Release dateMay 5, 2009
    ISBN9780061874499
    Author

    Andrew Roberts

    Andrew Roberts took a first in modern history from Gonville & Caius College, Cambridge. He is a fellow of the Institute of Napoleonic Studies and has lectured on Napoleon in America, Canada and Britain. Along with Colonel John Hughes-Wilson of the Corps of Battlefield Guides, he conducts annual tours to Waterloo under the auspices of Tours with Experts.

    Read more from Andrew Roberts

    Related to Masters and Commanders

    Related ebooks

    Military Biographies For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Creating Hallowed Ground

      Oct 11, 2022

      Creating Hallowed Ground
      9 min read

    • Article

      Letters

      Mar 14, 2024

      I wanted to write in to say how moved I was by Hannah Skoda’s article on the history of breastfeeding (An Act of Love, February). I became a mum myself quite recently, and wasn’t ready for how breastfeeding can feel lonely, frustrating, beautiful and

      4 min read

    • Article

      Source Secrets

      Sep 29, 2022

      Source Secrets
      3 min read

    • Article

      This Day In History

      Mar 11, 2022

      Did You Know? The “fool” – or jester – wasn’t unique to Europe’s medieval courts. Jesters crop up in Chinese history books and literature, and one of the most famous jesters ever was Raja Birbal, appointed by the Mogal emperor, Akbar. In West Africa,

      1 min read

    • Article

      Land Fit For The Fallen

      Oct 30, 2017

      Land Fit For The Fallen
      8 min read

    • Article

      Letters

      Apr 14, 2022

      As I was coming to the end of February’s issue, I was delighted to read Priya Atwal’s article about Ancient House Museum of Thetford Life (Explore, pictured below). I am always thrilled to find local museums in towns, usually hidden away and rarely w

      4 min read

    • Article

      Onwards, Unknown Soldier

      Nov 4, 2020

      THERE was no doubt in the mind of The Times’s leader writer about the significance of the event. The ceremony, he wrote, had been ‘the most beautiful, the most touching, and the most impressive that in all its long, eventful story this island has eve

      5 min read

    • Article

      Q&A YOU ASK, WE ANSWER

      May 12, 2022

      Q&A YOU ASK, WE ANSWER
      8 min read

    • Article

      Your Letters

      Oct 9, 2020

      Your Letters
      5 min read

    • Article

      The Story Of The People, By The People

      Nov 25, 2021

      THE ORIGINAL WHAT IS HISTORY? was the published version of the George Macaulay Trevelyan Lectures delivered by E.H. Carr at the University of Cambridge in early 1961. It was available in a slim Penguin version in 1977 when I prepared for the General

      4 min read

    • Article

      Letters

      Jul 7, 2022

      A c1594 portrait of John Dee. The astrologer’s court role points to widespread magical belief, says reader Juliet O’Brien I enjoy reading your Letters pages, and Jill Stewart-Rattray’s contribution in June’s edition caught my particular attention. Sh

      4 min read

    • Article

      History

      Apr 3, 2024

      Viking, 464pp, £20 In this follow-up to his 2021 bestseller Empireland, wrote Andrew Marr in the Times, Sanghera ‘tries to understand why the modern British display such amnesia about their forebears’ vast, world-changing project.’ Although the book

      11 min read

    • Article

      Letters

      Nov 26, 2020

      It is always my favourite time of the month when BBC History Magazine arrives on the doorstep, and I was pleased to see some ancient history making an appearance in the November issue. I enjoyed Andrew Bayliss’s account of Leonidas and the battle of

      4 min read

    • Article

      Letters

      Jul 9, 2020

      Letters
      4 min read

    • Article

      Hurrah For The Wavy Navy

      Mar 9, 2022

      Hurrah For The Wavy Navy
      5 min read

    • Article

      History In The News

      Jul 9, 2020

      History In The News
      2 min read

    • Article

      A Step Back In Time

      Oct 23, 2018

      A Step Back In Time
      2 min read

    • Article

      Wrath And Aftermath

      Aug 6, 2019

      By Elisabeth Gallas; translated from the German by Alex Skinner. New York University Press, 2019. $35. Reviewed by K. M. Kostyal Europe lay in ruins and 6 million Jews had been murdered when, in late winter 1946, the American military designated an o

      8 min read

    • Article

      Fighting On

      Jul 1, 2020

      Fighting On
      8 min read

    • Article

      The hidden Victorians

      Nov 24, 2022

      The hidden Victorians
      8 min read

    • Article

      A Place Worth Fighting For

      Mar 30, 2022

      Daisy Dunn (Wiedenfeld & Nicolson, £20) ON one of his lighter poetry-writing mornings, Christmas 1944, T. S. Eliot wrote this: Mr Maurice Bowra Gets sourer and sourer,Having been in a hurryTo succeed Gilbert MurrayAnd is now (poor soul) at the bott

      5 min read

    • Article

      A Vivid Chronicle Of Chroniclers

      Feb 24, 2022

      AS A PUBLISHING executive, Richard Cohen edited authors such as Jeffrey Archer, John le Carré, and Fay Weldon. As a fencer he competed at three Olympic Games, wrote a history of swordsmanship, and appeared as an extra in the James Bond movie Die Anot

      5 min read

    • Article

      Where Will Your Reading Take You?

      Mar 10, 2023

      by Susan Ronald An intriguing study of the male and female ‘influencers and enablers’ who actively worked towards blinding Britain, the US and even Germany to what Adolf Hitler and his accomplices were planning, and enacting, in the years before and

      5 min read

    • Article

      Necrolog

      Jun 16, 2022

      John Nicholson was the only child of Captain W Ivan Nicholson and Eleanor (Nella) Zollner, daughter of the Danish Consul. In 1946, when John was six, the family moved to Flying Rat Cottage in Great Dunmow, Essex, where they kept poultry, plus a goat

      6 min read

    Reviews for Masters and Commanders

    4/5

    49 ratings4 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 4/5
      The focus of Roberts' work is the complex interrelationship of four key leaders: Roosevelt and Churchill (the "Masters," i.e., the political players) and Brooke and Marshall (the "Commanders," i.e., the military leaders). He presents these four figures (along with a distinguished supporting cast of notable figures) as ultimately responsible for what he calls WW2's "grand strategy." The story that Roberts tells is one of a rather sobering struggle for power between Britain and the US. On Britain's side, the struggle largely comprised attempts to maintain a relatively equal position as American contributions of personnel and materiel began to far outstrip Britain's own contributions. On America's side, the struggle took shape as a fight against an at least perceived (if not actually real) British "craftiness" in pursuing its own political ends. I suppose, at one level, Roberts' book could be considered a jaundiced reading of United States-Great Britain relations during WW2; however, it avoids a cynical tone, maintaining a sense of sympathetic realism. One thing Roberts finely elucidated is the subtle but significant differences in the relations of political and military power in the US and Great Britain which, in many ways, accounted for the differences of each nations' final objectives and methods. My impression is that there was a decidedly greater separation of political and military power within the American system than within the British system, though that may simply be what we could call the "Churchill effect." If anything, Roberts does a terrific job of painting Churchill as the "madcap genius" he was--equal parts brilliant, annoying, suave, and, at the end of day, absolutely inimitable as a national and international figure. For me, however, the best part of Roberts' telling is how he showcases the key sacrifices that George Marshall, the chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Sir Alan Brooke, the British Chief of the Imperial General Staff, made for their countries. Every general dreams of leading an army into a field of battle and yet, both Marshall and Brooke were forced to surrender their dream of leading the D-Day invasion because they were more valuable in their administrative roles. The history that Roberts relates, though, convincingly demonstrates that, without them, final victory would never have come to the Allies. Much of what makes Roberts' work so compelling is his access to the "unofficial" (and technically illegal on the British side) diaries of the military and political advisors who orbited around these four. He uses these sources to read "against" the official stories that have been published, most vigorously it seems against Churchill's own later accounting. Fortunately, he does this in a way that doesn't turn the work into a salacious and sensational kind of "World War 2: The Unauthorized Biography"; rather, he remains grounded in the established facts of actual events, which allows the unofficial sources to enrich and enliven the official history rather than simply to overturn it. Where the "official" story is wrong, Roberts' use of diaries and letters often led him to offer very plausible reasons why later retellings diverged from what we now know of the actual course of events. These, as often as not, were rooted in a touching and deeply human concern for the feelings and reputations of other significant leaders.I suppose the only real disappointment I had was the fact that, though Roberts referred several times to a great "falling out" after the conclusion of the war between Churchill and Brooke, he never really took the time to tell that story. The reason is simple: once Roosevelt died, the "Big Four" that were the focus of his narrative were no longer, so the story had to end. I would like to hope that Roberts will one day write about that. It never seems to fail that, no matter how "distant" a book may seem from my own expressed interests or current circumstances, I find within it something that seems to miraculously speak to my current "Sitz im Leben." The story of Marshall's and Brooke's sacrifices of personal glory for the greater good of the war effort was, for reasons that would be too convoluted to explain here, a very important story for me to hear at this particular life juncture. Perhaps it's a stretch to say that God "led" me to read this particular book, but it is no stretch at all for me to say that I'm grateful to God that I DID read it. For those fascinated with the astounding history of World War II or those who find themselves in unexpected and, to be honest, sometimes unwanted positions of leadership and responsibility, this book has many important lessons to teach. Roberts is a fine storyteller and a master of the complex characterization, which serves him well in this story of four of the most significant leaders of the 20th century.
    • 5/5
      Great view of how strategy was made by the Western Allies.
    • 5/5
      I strongly recommend this book for anyone interested in strategic planning by the Western Allies in World War II, in particular the personalities and details of the wartime conferences of the top American and British leaders: Roosevelt, Churchill and their top generals and admirals (The "Masters and Commanders" of the title). The author has thoroughly researched the subject matter, quoting extensively from contemporaneous diaries, letters and memoranda. Among the illuminating items in this regard are excerpts from first-drafts of Churchill's six-volume History of World War II, showing sentences that were dropped from the final published version. The subtitle of Masters and Commanders is "How Four Titans Won the War in the West, 1941-1945" and the book's cover displays their four photos: FDR, Churchill, Marshall and the less well known British General Alan Brooke. The book's title is a bit of a case of mis-labeling because the book has Brooke as very much the protagonist. He is a more fully developed flesh and blood character while the other three are more like card-board cut-outs. It's closer to being "The Alan Brooke Story." The book is not only centered on him but it is largely sympathetic to his point of view. Although not quite a hagiography, it still seems to seek to portray him as a strategic genius. In my view the supporting evidence for that verdict is mixed. Churchill seems to come off as a boob in much of the book and the author, seemingly realizing this, unconvincingly declares Churchill "a genius" in his epilogue. The book might be annoying to some of my fellow Americans because it is a pretty Anglocentric. A number of American officers (King, Stillwell, Wedemeyer) are dismissed as "anglophobes" as if that explains everything you need to know about them. He also argues that Brooke and the British were correct to delay the Normandy Invasion until 1944 since earlier than that would have risked disaster. He does acknowledge that, while the Brits were correct to want to invade southern Italy, they were misguided in their desires to fight their way up the peninsula instead of just stopping after the southern sector including the Foggia airfields had been secured. Overall, very good.
    • 5/5
      This is an excellent book, studying in good detail the meetings between amrerican and British leaders during World War Ii. There ar eineffect biographies of the four "titans" FDR, Cchurchill, George Marshall, and Alan Brooke. Th author is English but I thought he was pretty objective, and often pointed out where the British were wron. I thought Brooke came off as insolent and wrongly judgmental, and I did not think he was a titan, myself.