Unavailable
Unavailable
Unavailable
Ebook494 pages7 hours
On Revolution
By Hannah Arendt and Jonathan Schell
Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
4/5
()
Currently unavailable
Currently unavailable
About this ebook
A unique and fascinating look at violent political change by one of the most profound thinkers of the twentieth century and the author of Eichmann in Jerusalem and The Origins of Totalitarianism
Hannah Arendt’s penetrating observations on the modern world, based on a profound knowledge of the past, have been fundamental to our understanding of our political landscape. On Revolution is her classic exploration of a phenomenon that has reshaped the globe. From the eighteenth-century rebellions in America and France to the explosive changes of the twentieth century, Arendt traces the changing face of revolution and its relationship to war while underscoring the crucial role such events will play in the future. Illuminating and prescient, this timeless work will fascinate anyone who seeks to decipher the forces that shape our tumultuous age.
Hannah Arendt’s penetrating observations on the modern world, based on a profound knowledge of the past, have been fundamental to our understanding of our political landscape. On Revolution is her classic exploration of a phenomenon that has reshaped the globe. From the eighteenth-century rebellions in America and France to the explosive changes of the twentieth century, Arendt traces the changing face of revolution and its relationship to war while underscoring the crucial role such events will play in the future. Illuminating and prescient, this timeless work will fascinate anyone who seeks to decipher the forces that shape our tumultuous age.
Unavailable
Author
Hannah Arendt
Hannah Arendt (1906–1975) is considered one of the most important and influential thinkers of the twentieth century. A political theorist and philosopher, she is also the author of Crises of the Republic, On Violence, The Life of the Mind, and Men in Dark Times. The Origins of Totalitarianism was first published in 1951.
Read more from Hannah Arendt
The Human Condition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Origins Of Totalitarianism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Life of the Mind: The Groundbreaking Investigation on How We Think Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Totalitarianism: Part Three of The Origins of Totalitarianism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Men in Dark Times Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Violence Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Love and Saint Augustine Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Correspondence of Hannah Arendt and Gershom Scholem Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to On Revolution
Related ebooks
Radicals: Portraits of a Destructive Passion Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Down with the Law: Anarchist Individualist Writings from Early Twentieth-Century France Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWilliam Godwin: A Political Life Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNo Gods No Masters: An Anthology of Anarchism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Critical Crossings: The New York Intellectuals in Postwar America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnarchist Portraits Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Prophet of Community: The Romantic Socialism of Gustav Landauer Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Desolation and Enlightenment: Political Knowledge After Total War, Totalitarianism, and the Holocaust Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Tyranny of Human Rights: From Jacobinism to the United Nations Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Collected Couteau. Essays and Interviews (Third, Revised Edition) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYou Say You Want a Revolution?: Radical Idealism and Its Tragic Consequences Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Tolerant Populists, Second Edition: Kansas Populism and Nativism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Wisdom of Sartre Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDid Somebody Say Totalitarianism?: Five Interventions in the (Mis)Use of a Notion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDid Somebody Say Totalitarianism?: 5 Interventions in the (Mis)Use of a Notion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFeeling the Unthinkable, Vol. 4: Power of the Pen - Iconoclasts to the Rescue Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIn the Crossfire: Adventures of a Vietnamese Revolutionary Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fighting for the Higher Law: Black and White Transcendentalists Against Slavery Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHannah Arendt, Totalitarianism, and the Social Sciences Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFreedom’s Furies: How Isabel Paterson, Rose Wilder Lane, and Ayn Rand Found Liberty in an Age of Darkness Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConspiracy: How the Paranoid Style Flourishes and Where It Comes From Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Art, Literature and Culture from a Marxist Perspective Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStudy Guide for Decoding Anthem: With Typical Questions and Answers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Wind From the East: French Intellectuals, the Cultural Revolution, and the Legacy of the 1960s - Second Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnarchism: A Collection of Revolutionary Writings Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Resistance to Christianity: A Chronological Encyclopaedia of Heresy from the Beginning to the Eighteenth Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Devil in History: Communism, Fascism, and Some Lessons of the Twentieth Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCounter-revolution of the Word: The Conservative Attack on Modern Poetry, 1945-1960 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNeoliberalism and Contemporary American Literature Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFactory of Strategy: Thirty-Three Lessons on Lenin Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Philosophy For You
Bhagavad Gita (in English): The Authentic English Translation for Accurate and Unbiased Understanding Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Questions for Deep Thinkers: 200+ of the Most Challenging Questions You (Probably) Never Thought to Ask Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Buddha's Guide to Gratitude: The Life-changing Power of Everyday Mindfulness Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Course in Miracles: Text, Workbook for Students, Manual for Teachers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Bhagavad Gita Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Be Here Now Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Hold a Cockroach: A book for those who are free and don't know it Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Experiencing God (2021 Edition): Knowing and Doing the Will of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Inward Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Beyond Good and Evil Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Daily Stoic: A Daily Journal On Meditation, Stoicism, Wisdom and Philosophy to Improve Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Tibetan Book of the Dead Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Courage to Be Happy: Discover the Power of Positive Psychology and Choose Happiness Every Day Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mindfulness in Plain English: 20th Anniversary Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Lessons of History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: A New English Version Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Lying Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Four Loves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: Six Translations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Boy, the Mole, the Fox and the Horse Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Meditations: Complete and Unabridged Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Egyptian Book of the Dead: The Complete Papyrus of Ani Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Be Perfect: The Correct Answer to Every Moral Question Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Loving Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for On Revolution
Rating: 3.9756096146341466 out of 5 stars
4/5
82 ratings3 reviews
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5If you know nothing about Arendt, I imagine this book will be incomprehensible and at the same time seem really radical. Knowing a little bit about her, as I do, rather undermines that. Perhaps if you know a lot about her, you can swing back round to radical? That would be nice.
Arendt argues that the American revolution should have been the model for the 20th century revolutions in, e.g., South America and Africa, but instead the revolutionaries took the French revolution as their model. At the same time, she's not interested in pretending that 20th century America has anything to do with Revolutionary America (the best thing about Arendt, by far, is that she just doesn't say what you expect people to say. Defenders of the American Revolution today say that America is more or less a fulfillment of the 'founders'' intentions, but needs to be more like them (either by being more democratic, or by being more libertarian). Arendt says America today is really pretty unpleasant. Refreshing).
Why take the U.S. revolution as a model? Because it was not concerned with the 'social question.' The U.S. revolution, on Arendt's understanding, was entirely concerned with *creating* a strong state, which could hold together the various colonies, and provide an enduring space of political action. It was primarily a political, not a social, revolution.
The French revolution took place in a very different context: mass impoverishment. Once the revolutionaries had taken power, their attention was naturally diverted to this enormous inequality. They started to see themselves as defenders of The People--not a polity. And once you're on the side of the people, Arendt argues, you naturally accept no limitations on your own power. Hence, the terror.
Weird as this is, it gets even weirder when she explains why the U.S. revolution did not ultimately succeed: because poor people immigrated to the U.S. from Europe. Poor people don't care about 'politics,' so the space for discussion the founders set up was allowed to atrophy.
In other words, she wants to say that there can be no successful revolution where there are poor people. Why would you want a revolution where there are no poor people? So a self-chosen elite (her term) can talk about things rationally in a space set up for such discussions. What would they talk about? It's unclear.
How can Arendt combine great analytical rigor and an understanding of historical context (e.g., the American revolution could call on pre-existing legal and political systems at the state and municipal level, and needed only to replace the 'crown' as the sovereign, whereas the French revolution did not have such a history to draw upon, and felt the need to create everything anew, with terrible consequences) with claims as erroneous as her suggestion that the U.S. formalized and institutionalized the idea of political opposition (there is no 'opposition' in the U.S., as far as I can tell, whereas there is in Westminster-derived systems), and as horrific as "poor immigrants ruined America"?
As ever, her fear of structural *explanations* pushes her into political and even moral turpitude. The American revolution was not set up to deal with mass capitalist society, and so its institutions struggle in the present. But those concepts (mass, capitalist, society) aren't allowed into Arednt's analysis. To account for the failure of the American revolution--as interpreted according to Arendt's key concept of 'action'--she has to find an agent on whom to pin the blame. It must be the poor Europeans, because if you admit that there are poor Americans, you would have to explain how poor people came to exist in a country that, according to Arendt, lacked poverty until the 19th century.
Don't tell the slaves. - Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Arendt's examination of revolution as a phenomenon of modern politics.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5"The momentous role that hypocrisy and the passion for its unmasking came to play in the later stages of the French Revolution, though it may never cease to astound the historian, is a matter of historical record. The revolution, before it proceeded to devour its own children, had unmasked them, and French historiography, in more than a hundred and fifty years, has reproduced and documented all these exposures until no one is left among the chief actors who does not stand accused, or at least suspected, of corruption, duplicity, and mendacity."