After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars
4/5
()
Currently unavailable
Currently unavailable
About this ebook
The end of the Cold War was a "big bang" reminiscent of earlier moments after major wars, such as the end of the Napoleonic Wars in 1815 and the end of the World Wars in 1919 and 1945. Here John Ikenberry asks the question, what do states that win wars do with their newfound power and how do they use it to build order? In examining the postwar settlements in modern history, he argues that powerful countries do seek to build stable and cooperative relations, but the type of order that emerges hinges on their ability to make commitments and restrain power.
The author explains that only with the spread of democracy in the twentieth century and the innovative use of international institutions--both linked to the emergence of the United States as a world power--has order been created that goes beyond balance of power politics to exhibit "constitutional" characteristics. The open character of the American polity and a web of multilateral institutions allow the United States to exercise strategic restraint and establish stable relations among the industrial democracies despite rapid shifts and extreme disparities in power.
Blending comparative politics with international relations, and history with theory, After Victory will be of interest to anyone concerned with the organization of world order, the role of institutions in world politics, and the lessons of past postwar settlements for today. It also speaks to today's debate over the ability of the United States to lead in an era of unipolar power.
Read more from G. John Ikenberry
The Crisis of American Foreign Policy: Wilsonianism in the Twenty-first Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReasons of State: Oil Politics and the Capacities of American Government Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to After Victory
Titles in the series (64)
Active Defense: China's Military Strategy since 1949 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Certain Idea of France: French Security Policy and Gaullist Legacy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Economic Discrimination and Political Exchange: World Political Economy in the 1930s and 1980s Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEntangling Relations: American Foreign Policy in Its Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRoosevelt and the Munich Crisis: A Study of Political Decision-Making Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGeorge F. Kennan and the Making of American Foreign Policy, 1947-1950 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGermany Divided: From the Wall to Reunification Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWe All Lost the Cold War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMercenaries, Pirates, and Sovereigns: State-Building and Extraterritorial Violence in Early Modern Europe Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Who Adjusts?: Domestic Sources of Foreign Economic Policy during the Interwar Years Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Limits of Safety: Organizations, Accidents, and Nuclear Weapons Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSatellites and Commissars: Strategy and Conflict in the Politics of Soviet-Bloc Trade Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Constructed Peace: The Making of the European Settlement, 1945-1963 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Korean War: An International History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Clash of Ideas in World Politics: Transnational Networks, States, and Regime Change, 1510-2010 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Sovereign State and Its Competitors: An Analysis of Systems Change Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Does Conquest Pay?: The Exploitation of Occupied Industrial Societies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Politics of Secularism in International Relations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrom Wealth to Power: The Unusual Origins of America's World Role Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Cooperation among Democracies: The European Influence on U.S. Foreign Policy Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Regional Orders at Century's Dawn: Global and Domestic Influences on Grand Strategy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDriving the Soviets up the Wall: Soviet-East German Relations, 1953-1961 Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5In the Shadow of the Garrison State: America's Anti-Statism and Its Cold War Grand Strategy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Appeasing Bankers: Financial Caution on the Road to War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWar and Punishment: The Causes of War Termination and the First World War Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Stay the Hand of Vengeance: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related ebooks
After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars, New Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Constitutional Diplomacy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Safeguarding Democratic Capitalism: U.S. Foreign Policy and National Security, 1920-2015 Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5The Long War: A New History of U.S. National Security Policy Since World War II Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn Power and Ideology: The Managua Lectures Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Crucible: Thirteen Months that Forged Our World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAftershocks: Great Powers and Domestic Reforms in the Twentieth Century Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Punitive Turn in American Life: How the United States Learned to Fight Crime Like a War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsShaped by War and Trade: International Influences on American Political Development Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Sense of Power: The Roots of America's Global Role Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Why Wilson Matters: The Origin of American Liberal Internationalism and Its Crisis Today Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5War, States, and Contention: A Comparative Historical Study Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mercenaries, Pirates, and Sovereigns: State-Building and Extraterritorial Violence in Early Modern Europe Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5American Foreign Policy and Its Thinkers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5States of the Union Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEntangling Relations: American Foreign Policy in Its Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAntitrust and the Formation of the Postwar World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDecline and Fall: The End of Empire and the Future of Democracy in 21st Century America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWriting the Civil War: The Quest to Understand Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Concentration of Power: Institutionalization, Hierarchy & Hegemony Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKorean Endgame: A Strategy for Reunification and U.S. Disengagement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Deterring Democracy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Appeasing Bankers: Financial Caution on the Road to War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Cultural Contradictions of Democracy: Political Thought since September 11 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDeep State: The Planned Third World War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCold War Illinois Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSuperpower Illusions: How Myths and False Ideologies Led America Astray—and How to Return to Reality Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Speaking up and Speaking Out Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsU.S. Militarism, Corporate Interests and World War III: The Pentagon and CIA: Soldiers of the Corporatocracy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
International Relations For You
Prisoners of Geography: Ten Maps That Explain Everything About the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Crazy Like Us: The Globalization of the American Psyche Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Inside the CIA Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The CIA as Organized Crime: How Illegal Operations Corrupt America and the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This Is How They Tell Me the World Ends: The Cyberweapons Arms Race Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Can We Talk About Israel?: A Guide for the Curious, Confused, and Conflicted Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Fateful Triangle: The United States, Israel, and the Palestinians (Updated Edition) Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Palestine Peace Not Apartheid Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5From Beirut to Jerusalem Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Masters of Mankind: Essays and Lectures, 1969-2013 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA History of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Second Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Coup: 1953, the CIA, and the Roots of Modern U.S.-Iranian Relations Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Palestine-Israel Conflict: A Basic Introduction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/527 Articles Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Putin's Playbook: Russia's Secret Plan to Defeat America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5When China Attacks: A Warning to America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Narco History: How the United States and Mexico Jointly Created the "Mexican Drug War" Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Fidel Castro: My Life: A Spoken Autobiography Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5One Palestine, Complete: Jews and Arabs Under the British Mandate Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sex and World Peace Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5In the Garden of Beasts: by Erik Larson | Summary & Analysis: Love, Terror and an American Family in Hitler’s Berlin Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Pentagon Papers: The Secret History of the Vietnam War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for After Victory
12 ratings1 review
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5In After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars, G. John Ikenberry sets out for himself the task of explaining why the international order constructed by the United States following the end of World War II has lasted as long as it has. Given standard international relations theory--at least of the Realist kind--the durability of this international order is puzzling because the great power against which it was ostensibly constructed to balance--the Soviet Union--ceased to exist at the end of 1991. Yet, at the time this book was published, and in the years since then, there had been little indication that the world's states were preparing to, or even thinking about, allying to balance against the power of the U.S., which is what standard Realist theory says should happen.Ikenberry's answer to this puzzle is institutionalization. That is to say that Ikenberry contends that the international order created by the U.S. in the aftermath of World War II is of such a nature that the lesser powers of the world do not feel the need to balance against the U.S. because they believe that the institutional restraints put into the international order by the U.S. are strong enough to keep the U.S. itself from using its overwhelming power advantage in such a way as to perpetually keep them subservient to its interests.While it is an interesting theory, there are two problems that I have with After Victory. First, Ikenberry provides little evidence that his theory is in fact the reason why the post-World War II order has been so durable. In actuality, After Victory is more about how such international orders are formed than it is about why they are so durable. Second, Ikenberry does not provide any effective refutation of the Realist answer to the conundrum of why no balancing has occurred against the U.S.: that the other states in the world are so far behind the U.S. in relative power that they see no realistic way of combining against it without first provoking its ire before any effective anti-American coalition can be formed.That being said, Ikenberry's theory is one with which I am inclined to be sympathetic. The decade of the 2000s has provided a welter of instances in which the international order should have broken down but did not. The U.S. still holds a large power advantage over the rest of the world, but it is shrinking by the year with still no signs of any impending formation of an anti-American coalition. The only one that is even close to becoming serious is a combination between Russia and China, but that has been more playacting than serious. Neither Russia nor China has shown any interest, as of yet, in trying to upset the world's liberally-oriented international order.And even if a combination against the U.S. were to form, that does not necessarily negate Ikenberry's theory. It would only negate it if the contenders were bent on rewriting the rules, like the Soviet Union was. In all likelihood, whichever state or states succeeds the U.S. as top dog will hold on to only a slightly modified version of the current international order for the same reason that the U.S. has held on to it for so long: ruling by consent of the governed is a lot cheaper than ruling by force.