• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
To All My Investor Friends: Happy New Year 2006
It is hard to believe another year has gone by so quickly. Where does thetime go? It was a challenging year for investors. The markets went down,they went up, and ended up not far from where they started. One had to be inthe right place at the right time to make any advance in 2005. I wasfortunate to do just that with a market beating portfolio again this year,for the 7
th
year in a row (since my dismal relative performance in 1998).This year saw the launching of my financial services website:www.wealth-ed.com. It also saw my enrollment in UCLA and their online FinancialPlanning certificate program. I received “A’s” in both classes I took (I amsure you are impressed), and had great enjoyment in the curriculum and myreturn as a university student for the first time since 1982. But as theyear progressed, I found the time is not right to make Financial Planning afull time, or even part time endeavor. Instead, I am assisting my son,Jared, with his own business and website:www.xactsensing.com. I will getback to the financial services business once XACT is up and runningprofitably. Still, I will continue to post this annual letter, plus theoccasional financial or life insight on “Wealth-Ed” (The Money Academy).As always, I start by recounting last year’s plan (quotes in italics asemailed on Dec. 31, 2005) and how it fared:
 My overview of the market to you at the beginning of 2005:
“The story line for investing in 2005 has one important theme: Protectagainst a declining dollar.” 
Okay, this goes to show that one can’t count on being right all the time. Iwas dead wrong on the direction of the dollar vis-à-vis other currencies.However, I was not wrong about the underlying weakness of the USA currencydue to current account and budget deficits and the direction of gold and oilagainst the dollar. But what I didn’t count on was the commitment of othercentral banks to match the dollar move for move. Basically, we are inanother period of “Beggar thy neighbor”. This is an economic concept wherebyeach country tries to devalue its currency against others to improve itsdomestic economic agenda, i.e. to put its people to work. The last time theworld saw a prolonged period of this phenomena was the 1930s. Need I saymore?
I have been concerned about the rate of appreciation in real estate since atleast 2002. 10% plus appreciation is not sustainable for any length of timesince real estate historically appreciates at the rate of inflation plus 1%(probably attributable to quality-of-life improvements like average squarefeet, plumbing, water and electricity) and no more. Here was my comment lastyear on that subject:
“We are currently at a flux-point after the bursting of one bubble, the stockor equity bubble, but just prior to the bursting of a real estate bubble. Wecan argue about the degree of the real estate bubble, but not about itsexistence. The long term, 100 year average of real estate appreciation isapproximately the same as real GNP (inflation adjusted). So, in this period of low inflation, there should also be low real estate appreciation on par with GNP, about 3-4% annually. Yet, real estate has been appreciating from
 
10-20% annually in various markets the past 10 years. This is a bubble and it must burst or revert to historical norms at some point.” 
First, Dr. Robert Shiller (Yale University) precisely defined growth at 1%over inflation, the number I now reference, in his book from March 2005,“Irrational Exuberance 2”. This number was arrived at by extensivehistorical research conducted by a squad of graduate students. So, longterm, 100 year growth rates in real estate are less than I had estimated lastyear (3-4% over inflation). Second, I believe government and industry datafrom the last couple months (nearly 20 year high in housing inventory on themarket, “days on market” at over 60 days, another 20 year high), shows thatthe real estate bubble is in the process of being popped, thanks in largepart to the commitment of the Fed to raise interest rates and discourageexcess lending. We will know more next year at this time how severely thereal estate markets turn down, which geographic markets are most affected andwhether all of this precipitates a recession.
On my list last year of 10 things to consider for financial security, number9 was:
“The very best commodity to hold in 2005 will be gold. Why? Gold is thelikely exchange currency of choice should the $USD fall out of favor becauseof the devaluation underway. Also, gold is a commodity that has many industrial uses and is therefore consumed every year. It is relatively difficult to increase supply, so a suddenly increased demand is likely toexceed the ability to increase supplies to match.” 
Again, I was right on the money here, and my position in gold stocksbenefited because of this call. I believe this trend will continue for sometime. It has only just started. The gold cycle is similar to the oil cycle.They benefit from both being valued as “hard assets” with intrinsic historicvalue, even though the values are different to homo sapiens. As our tradeand budget deficits continue to weaken the dollar, it becomes less attractiveas the world’s “reserve currency” and gold becomes more attractive. Thischange in thinking will take years to play out as gold continues its march to$2000 per ounce.
Here is my advice from 2005 and my commentary on any changes needed for 2006:
+ Stay conservative (Still True and will be until equities are againcheap…below 10x current earnings)
; I still think this is not a time for themarket to rally. The market price to earnings ratio is not anywhere near atypical low in respect to valuation, at the current 17 or 18 times (evenhigher once employee stock option expenses are deducted from earnings, whichwill be required by July 1, 2006). But a 10x earnings factor would require asignificant inflationary environment. I am not as convinced of runaway inflation as last year, especially with Ben Bernanke as Fed Chairman. So Iam changing the definition of a “cheap stock market” to 13 times in a 5%inflation environment.
+ Protect against the possibility of inflation… inflation is very likely in2005, more so than 2004 for reasons that will be outlined. While inflation,as measured by CPI, stayed relatively quiet in 2004 at less than 3%, itreversed 20 years of downward direction; given the large increases incommodity prices, most notably oil from $25 to $50 per barrel, inflation willcontinue to accelerate into 2005.
How do you like that prediction of $50oil? Seemed crazy a year ago when at $35, didn’t it? This is why I think
 
that 5% inflation is baked into the cake, even though government stats don’tyet report it. Commodities of all kinds have increased 2-5 times over whatthey were in 2000 (when oil was $10 for a time). Much of this is offset by imports of cheaper manufactured goods from Asia. But going forward, importswill not get any cheaper (higher commodity input prices and increasingly higher labor costs are also a reality in China) and the higher costs of commodities will work their way through the world economy.
+ Sell REITs and any commercial real estate holdings; we are at the peak ofa 20+ year real estate cycle; REITs are now selling at prices that yield lessthan 5% on average, on par with risk free 10 year Treasuries; REITs will behurt by higher interest rates and an eventual economic downturn in 2006.Cash out now;
Hey, another good call! I haven’t changed my views on realestate, and won’t until we get those REIT dividend yields back to 8% likethey were in 1999 and 2000. All that is required is for real estate todecline relative to other asset classes and rents / revenues to increase.This will not happen for another 5 or more years. REIT yields are now lessthan super-safe 6 month T-Bills.
 + Stocks: the Large Cap Value sector is the last stop during a businesscycle. This was a good strategy in 2004 with a total (price + dividend)return on the Russell LC Value 1000 (ETF ticker: IWD) of 14.2%. Highdividend, high ROE and free cash flow, large cap, and slow growth stocks willdo well again in 2005; medical, insurance, energy, consumer staples(household) products, defense, are the place to be at the cycle peak andgoing into a business downturn (in 2005); expect another 10-20% return in2005 on this sector;
Okay, this one wasn’t perfect, but not bad either.Classic recession proof / defensive sectors like consumer stales and defensedid not do well because the economy held up well against all odds. Butdefensive energy and healthcare proved to be very good sectors for 2005, placing first and third out of the ten S&P sectors (utilities, another defensive sector was No. 2). I wouldn’t make any changes to this prediction,since I think we will finally see the economy weaken in 2006, though I havelowered my energy exposure since it has become fully valued at this time.Utilities, which I never bought, are also fully valued.
 + Commodities: given the direction of the dollar, a very good hedge is to owncommodities which will appreciate in $USD terms, as the dollar declines. Thebest way to own commodities is mutual funds or ETFs that hold companiesproducing those commodities. Additionally, many have significant dividends.See the following for recommendations.
This was perhaps my boldest and bestcall. Gold mining stocks increased over 40% in 2005 after years of doing nothing. All the commodities did well in 2005, especially the first half.We are in a bit of a pullback in most commodities as they have become over-owned, but I think this is a significant long term trend and will add to my  positions on price weakness.
+ U.S. Bonds: because inflation is accelerating, stay very short term inbonds: less than 3 year duration on average and preferably Inflation-protected; Hi-yield or junk bonds are at cyclical high prices and will onlygo down, especially with increasing defaults at the next economic downturn;wait for the next recession to rebuild junk bond positions;
This was the proper recommendation for 2005, though the long bonds did not get hammered asexpected. So anyone who did not shorten duration or improve quality got abreak. Given the economic environment and the flatness of the yield curve asof this date (January 2, 2006), in 12 months, either long bonds will be at 5%and maybe much more, or we will be in a recession, at which point, short term
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...