Food on the Move Group Meeting – 22 October 2009
Present:Annie, Ron, Adrian, Anna, Krystal, Jonathan, Amy A., Kaitlynne,Elena, Shana, Meghan, Steve, Chelsea, JanetOur focus was on defining our next steps for the project. Steve, Annie,Chelsea, and Ron agree that our project of building out the exhibits at theCulinary Museum by selecting key objects and interpreting them along withthe plan to take panels out to sites in Providence and incorporate a printeditem (passport / map) is not too ambitious.
However, we need to refine our project and create a detailed plan as follows:
•
Need to define our relationship with the Culinary Museum in a meetingover the next three weeks.
o
We’ll come to the meeting prepared with a timeline, budget(including a request for a contribution from the museum), andquestions for Richard. (FIGURING OUT THE TL, BUDGET, ANDQUESTIONS WILL BE THE FOCUS OF OUR NEXT GROUP MEETING.)
Ex what do we do if an object needs conservation? Whopays for it?
Budget for acquiring things not in the collection?
Does culinary museum do its own design?
Do they approve texts?
Other projects planned that might conflict?
Process for graphics?
When can we work there for research and installation?
Requirements about layout? Overseeing installation?
Does construction need to happen there?
Who should we contact from the student body?
•
Need to set up a meeting ASAP
•
Get timeline constraints from students
o
Janet will begin to find possible meeting times with Richard.
o
At this meeting, we’ll formally request the space, use of thecollections, flexibility to say what we want in our interpretationspaces, recognition, and anything else we need. We should beexplicit about the relationship. (LET’S DISCUSS OUR NEEDS IN THE NEXT MEETING.)
Thinking about the exhibit component:
1830s – PresentEasy to break into pieces
Leave a Comment