'These Children Were Literally Lost In Adult Prison'
A few years ago, Sara Kruzan's story grabbed the attention of California StateSen.Leland Yee, D-San Francisco, who introduced legislation to abolish the sentence of lifewithout the possibility of parole for youth offenders. The bill was no get-out-of-jail pass;under his legislation, a juvenile who committed a felony before the age of 18 would servea minimum of 25 years before being eligible to go before a parole board (also not a get-out-of-jail pass).Yee is also a child psychologist. When it comes to judging the actions of teenagers versusthose of adults, he argues, "the neuroscience is clear; brain maturation continues wellthrough adolescence, and thus impulse control, planning and critical-thinking skills arestill not yet fully developed."Condemning teenagers to die in jail, then, means curtailing the lives of potentially productive members of society. "Children have a greater capacity for rehabilitation thanadults," Yee said. Anyway, didn't California's prison system rename itself the CaliforniaDepartment of Corrections
and Rehabilitation
?In politics, however, punitive almost always wins out -- particularly in California, where"three strikes" laws have led to a prison crisis unparalleled anywhere else in the country.Yee's bill met intense political resistance and eventually died.This past February, he introduced a new, watered-down bill that, instead of eliminatinglife without parole for juveniles would provide a review of a youth offender's sentenceafter 10 years.In 2005, Human Rights Watch published an unprecedented study,"The Rest of Their Lives: Life without Parole for Child Offenders in the United States,"which found "atleast 2,225 people incarcerated in the United States who have been sentenced to spendthe rest of their lives in prison for crimes they committed as children." Today, the number is even higher: 2,574.It's only recently that the plight of juveniles serving life in adult prisons came across thenational radar. Alison Parker, deputy director of the U.S. Program of Human RightsWatch told
AlterNet
, "these children were literally lost in adult prison. Nobody paidattention to the fact that they were under 18 at the time of their offense."But this could soon change. Next month, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments ina pair of cases --
Sullivan v. Florida
and
Graham v. Florida
-- that will decide whether life sentences for juveniles violate the Constitution's ban on cruel-and-unusual punishment.These cases follow the Court's landmark ruling in
Roper v. Simmons
four years ago,which struck down the death penalty for juvenile defendants on Eighth Amendmentgrounds. Echoing the opinion of Yee, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the majority
Leave a Comment