Case I: Students with disabilities in Greenwich, Connecticut1
Table of ContentsThe case
4
Document #1:
Connecticut State Department of Education, Bureau of Special Education and Pupil Services,
A Parent’s Guide to Special Educationin Connecticut
, (Hartford, CSDE, 2001) Excerpts.5
Exhibit #1:
Special Education Statistics
14
Exhibit #2:
The Changing nature of students’ disabilities
15
Exhibit #3:
Timeline of events in special education legislation
15
Document #2:
Lorraine M. McDonnell, Margaret J. McLaughlin, andPatricia Morison (eds.),
Educating One and All: Students with Disabilities and Standards-Based Reform
(Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press,1997 pp. 46-112.16
Document #3:
Joetta L. Sack, “Special education designation varieswidely across country,”
Education Week
, June 24, 1998.59
Document #4:
Lisa Fine, “Studies Examine Racial Disparities In SpecialEducation,”
Education Week
, March 14, 2001
64
Document #5:
Lisa Fine, “Report Offers Solutions to Special EducationDisparities,”
Education Week,
January 23, 200266
Document #6:
Christina A. Samuels, “Minority overrepresentation inspecial education targeted,”
Education Week
, October 12, 2005.68
Document #7:
Joetta L. Sack, “States Report Trouble With Special Ed.Testing,”
Education Week,
March 15, 2000
71
Document #8:
Joetta L. Sack, “Researchers Warn of Possible Pitfalls InSpec. Ed. Testing,”
Education Week,
April 19, 2000
72
Document #9:
Joetta L. Sack, “Alternate-Test Plans Prove Challenging,”
Education Week,
June 21, 2000
74
Document #10:
Christina A. Samuels, “Special education test flexibilitydetailed: Not every state may want to seek relief this year, Spellings says,”
Education Week
, May 18, 2005.77
Document #11:
Christina A. Samuels, “Flexibility detailed for testingstudents with disabilities,”
Education Week,
January 4, 200679
Leave a Comment