dmietze123 scribbled:

Under rule 201 a trial court must take judicial notice of a well-known fact at the request of one of the parties, if the court is provided with information supporting the fact. A court also has the option to take judicial notice at its discretion, without a request from a party. Rule 201 further provides that a court may take judicial notice at any time during a proceeding.

12 / 05 / 2009

nootkabearmcdonald scribbled:

The only thing these damned US appellate Courts are taking notice of is when a Pro Se litigant has an Appeal before them, they all notice that they are going to make sure the Pro Se litigant will not be allowed their Right to a fair and impartial tribunal!

12 / 08 / 2009

nootkabearmcdonald scribbled:

They have twisted the rules and laws to the point, they can't even remember what they said!

12 / 08 / 2009

MardiM2 scribbled:

You're correct on all counts, and it is an ex post facto law.

11 / 29 / 2009

dmietze123 scribbled:

I am so upset about this law - this isn't the first time I ran into judicial bias in LA County as a legal aid (many moons ago) and this firmly cements the elements of bias into rulings without the judges risking any responsibility. Therefor I wrote a letter to my senator asking for repeal of this bill.

11 / 30 / 2009