Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
8Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
U.S. SUPREME COURT JUDY v. OBAMA- Lt r to Supreme Crt Clerk and Proposed Schedule Order for Trial

U.S. SUPREME COURT JUDY v. OBAMA- Lt r to Supreme Crt Clerk and Proposed Schedule Order for Trial

Ratings: (0)|Views: 127|Likes:
Published by Cody Robert Judy
Letter to the U.S. Supreme Court Clerk in response to the directions for a case number in Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court, and a submission for Order of Scheduling a Trial with the U.S. Supreme Court sent to the Court Saturday, July 14th,2012
Letter to the U.S. Supreme Court Clerk in response to the directions for a case number in Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court, and a submission for Order of Scheduling a Trial with the U.S. Supreme Court sent to the Court Saturday, July 14th,2012

More info:

Published by: Cody Robert Judy on Jul 15, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/25/2012

pdf

text

original

 
CODY ROBERT JUDY3031 So. Ogden Ave.Suite #2Ogden UT. 84401801-497-6655- - - - - - - -SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESOffice of the Clerk 
 – 
Mr. William K. SuterWashington, DC 20543-0001RE: Cody Robert Judy v. Barack Obama July 14th, 2012- - - - - - - - -Dear Mr. Suter- Clerk of the Court:Accordingly pursuant of your letter July 9
th
, the following Petition for Writ of Certiorarihas been resubmitted to you with the following correction:The lower court opinion(s) have been appended for the Superior Court of Fulton
County, Georgia in the Appendix immediately following the “Typed”
version, after page 10.The Order from the Supreme Court of Georgia is also again included, per your request,to include such on re-submission.A copy of the corrected petition has also been resubmitted and signed for on theDeclaration of Mailing Statement served upon opposing counsel(s).No other change to the substance of the petition has been made.In the reflection of my July 1
st
2012 letter to your office I would like to re-state myconcern with this Petition in receiving the Courts attention with the urgency of the DemocraticNational Convention set to happen Sept. 5
th
,2012, and impugn the necessity for the Courtsattention to that the United States Constitution and Legislative mandates are not delegated asmoot in the courts supervisory powers as a check and balance for our Republic.To that end, I applauded the Georgia Courts in expediting the necessity of action tocounsels with email and phone conversation, for example giving me one day to respond to aMotion to Dismiss, in light of the Georgia Primary that a decision could be at least achieved , Ipresume, that appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court could be ascertained. I would appreciate this
Courts acknowledgement and circumvention of recess with “Special Session” rules and
powersin expediting expectations for Counsel(s) as the lower Courts managed.
 
There is still plenty of time between now and a manageable trial before the DemocraticNational Convention Sept 5
th
, which I would estimate to be 2 weeks prior, or by August22
nd
,2012The reason for this are that attending delegates to the Convention unbound can manage selectionof a qualified candidate for the Office of President, the following proposals I have alsoforwarded to apposing counsels and can upon the Courts own Order be altered and bound in theattached:WAIVER OF TIME RESTRAINT BY PETITIONER, AND SCHEDULED ORDER OFPROCEEDING OF THE COURTSincerely,__________________________Cody Robert JudyPetitioner- Judy v. Obama
 
 CODY ROBERT JUDY3031 So. Ogden Ave.Suite #2Ogden UT. 84401801-497-6655- - - - - - - -___________________________________________________________________
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
_____________________________________________________________________CODY ROBERT JUDY, WAIVER OF TIME RESTRAINT BYPetitioner, PETITIONER, AND SCHEDULE ORDERv. OF PROCEEDING BY THE COURTBARACK OBAMA et.al., Case No. ________________Respondent. Judge: ________________________________________________________________________________________________With the Democratic National Convention scheduled for Sept 5
th
2012, of which Petitioner andRespondent are scheduled to compete for the nomination of said parties delegates for the Officeof President, the following is herein proposed and so ordered that a decision from the Court canbe managed by the date of August 22
nd
,2012. Altered by the Court: ________________The extraordinary circumstances or reason(s) for this are in consideration of attending delegatesto the Convention can , so at the very least they can manage selection of a qualified candidate forthe Office of President pursuant the qualification demands of the Constitution, and still have 2weeks / Altered by the court: ______________ / to prepare prior for the National Convention.

Activity (8)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
MrPlutodog added this note
That would be following impeachment in the House, in subsequent trial by Senate to remove from office. Not a trial in the more common judicial sense. And no, we're not buying into your inaccurate, silly claim that oral argument amounts to trial. Not for a moment.
Jack Ryan added this note
This must come as a huge shock to you, but setting aside all the other problems with filing your writ, SCOTUS does not hold "trials".
jjandbobscribd liked this
Jack Ryan liked this
Jack Ryan liked this
Jack Ryan liked this
silverbull8 liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->