10TH PRIMILINARY 1]An inner Act\Doing or a term of an Inner act \doing [if it has any] comes in beingness\ thingness

from Ousia in the Ousia . The potentiality of coming in beingness\thoingness\existence of an inner act\ doing and its term [ if it has any] is an Eternal Attribute \Quality of the Ousia of Supreme Being.. Thus an inner term or an inner act\doing is POTANTIALLYY ETERNAL that is the Potentiality of an Inner Act\ Doing OR an Inner Term is Eternal. This Potentiality is an Eternal Attribute\ Quality of the Ousia Of Supreme Being. In this sense \ meaning any inner term [ a term of an inner act\ doing] may be termed as God since a term or an act\doing IN REGARD TO ITS POTENTIALLTY is identical to the Ousia ; in other words Potentiality is Identical to Ousia just like ESSENCE OF SUPREME BEING IS IDENTICAL TO THE ESSE\EXISTENCE OF SUPREME BEING.The word GOD Does Not Mean SUPREME BEING in this case. Thus Potentiality[which is an Attribute\ quality]is Identical to Ousia regardless of any thing , any attribute\ quality,any relation etc. An act \doing or a term of an act \ doing [if it has any] is identical to the ousia in regard to its potentiality ; and not regardless to its Potentiality. As mensioned in preliminary 8 there are two types of IDENTITIES. A] AN IDENTITY IN REGARD TO A PARTICULAR THING. B] AN IDENTITY REGARDLESS OF ANY THING. IT MAY BE SHEWN THAT THESE 2 TYPES OF IDENTITY are EVEN ACCORDING TO THE STANDERD OF TRINITARIANS AS WELL. Since a Hypostatic Person is Identical to the Ousia of Triune God \ TRI-UNITY\TRINITY in regard to only one thing [ what so ever it be] that is why the Divine Ousia is NOT A HYPOSTATIC PERSON inspite of being PAR SE SUBSISTENT, BUT SUBSISTENT ESSENCE\OUSIA IS IDENTICAL TO ESSE REGARDLESS OF ANY THING IN CASE OF SUPREME BEING SO ESSE\EXISTENCE\BEINGNESS\THINGNESS is the Ousia\SUBSISTENT ESSENCE. NOTE.1]One may say a Subsistent Nature is an Essence.(An other possible relation b\w Nature and Essence) 2].One may say If the Esse Of a Subsistent is Directly Referred to the Subsistence and Not in regard to any thing then the Subsistent is a Substance.] 2]An act\Doing of saying is an INTERIOR ACT \DOING BUT A VOLITIVE ACT \ DOING i.e it Pertains to the Quality \ Attribute of the Will of Supreme Being and Act \Doing of Supreme Being. But act\ Doing of seeing and act\doing of hearing are most probably do not pertain to Will of Supreme Being Other wise it Becomes Possible that the Supreme Being may not see a thing or may not hear a thing if the Supreme Being Will so. This appears to be a defect.But both Acts\ Doings are neither Eternal nor External [to Ousia] since the Occur in the Ousia. NOTE :- ONE MUST DISTINCT B/W THE ACT\DOING OF WILL AND ATTRIBUTE\QUALITY OF WILL. Divne will is an Ability to chose the doing or not doing which is Eternal while the Act\Doing of the Will is the Chosing.This is Neither Eternal Nor External. 11th PRIMILINARY;The ACT\DOING of Making means one of the following:1]Coming of a Thing External to Divine Subsistent Ousia from Nothingness.

2]The coming of a thing [External to divine Ousia] From Previously made thing which is either made from Nothing or froma previously made thing [ OR SO ON, BUT THIS SERIES MUST HAVE A BEGENING IN THE CASE OF SO ON IN BACK WORD DIRECTION] . 3] Some Athiests argue if some thing comes in Existence\Beingness from no thing then nothing is some thing from some thing comes. This is a fallacy. Nothing is nothing, Nothing but nothing,nothing is not any thing,nothing is not some thing, nothing is not a thing. To say nothing is a thing is a contradiction like to say Nothing is not nothing or a thing is not a thing. This is An External doing \act.It is Voluntary Act \Doing.It is different from acts\ doings in the Ousia like SEEING,HEARING SAYINF ETC. The inner DIVINE MACHANISM MAY BE MENTIONED AS FOLLOWS:(1)A NON ETERNAL DOING \ACT OF ETERNAL QUALITY OF WILL OCCURS IN OUSIA in regard to Making MENSIONED ABOVE., that is GOD CHOSES TO MAKE. (2) This act of Choice is Neither External Nor Eternal. This act Emanates non eternally from the Will In the Ousia. (3) Due to the Omnipotence Of GOD THE thing comes in Existence\ Beingness\Thingness\Esse from Nothingness\ Non Beingness\NonExistence\NonEsse. (4)Act of Making does not occur in Ousia. 12th Primilinary:Logos is Not God in regard to very self of Logos but one may term it a God in Regard to its potentiality. IOHN SAYS:IN THE/ A BEGENING WAS THE LOGOS THE LOGOS WAS WITH [THE] GOD. THE LOGOS WAS [A/THE] GOD. IT MAY BE INTERPRETED AS FOLLOWS:IN THE/ A [ NON ETERNAL] BEGENING WAS THE LOGOS THE LOGOS WAS WITH [THE] SUPREME BEING. THE LOGOS WAS [A/THE] A TERM IN SUPREMEBEING.. A term in Supreme Being may be called as GOD, WHILE the Supreme Being is also called a GOD. A Trinitarian also shifts the meaning of the Word God from SUPREME BEING TO A PERSON in SupremeBeing. So it is just a matter of choice b/w AN ATHANASIAN SHIFTING or ANTE NICAEAN SIIFTING [as according to our excogitation] A trinitarian version is:1]IN THE/ A BEGENING WAS THE LOGOS THE LOGOS WAS WITH [THE] SUPREME BEING. THE LOGOS WAS [A/THE] (HYPOSTASIS in THE OUSIA OF) SUPREME BEING. 2]. 1]IN THE/ A BEGENING WAS THE LOGOS THE LOGOS WAS WITH [THE] HYPOSTASIS OF SUPREME BEING.

THE LOGOS WAS [A/THE] (HYPOSTASIS in THE OUSIA OF) SUPREME BEING. BUT CERTAINLY NOT IN THE / BEGENING WAS THE LOGOS. THE LOGOS WAS WITH TRIUNE GOD THE LOGOS WAS [A/THE] TRIUNE GOD. Similarly I and My Father are One may be rendered as follow: Logos and [The] Supreme Being are One [in Ousia] in the following sense:THE BEINGNESS OF THE SUPREME BEING IS IDENTICAL TO THE OUSIA ,HENCE THE OUSIA OF THE SUPREME BEING IS NOT ONLY A BEING BUT THE VERY SUPREME BEING . Logos which is also the Logosial Nature Exists in Alio and Subsists in Alio , where the Alio for the Logos is the Mensioned above Ousia. In this sense the Supreme Being and the Ousia are One In OUSIA even if the reference\ascription of the Ousia to [the] SUPREME BEING IS OF IDENTITY AND TO THE LOGOS IS OF ALIO. CONCLUSION: I HAVE TRIED MY BEST TO DEVELOP THE ANTE NICAEAN THEOLOGICAL SYSTEM OF SOME ANTE NICACAEAN FATHERS . ARIANISM AND ATHANASIANISM ARE NOTHING BUT TO DIFFERENT EVILUTIONS OF SOME ANTE NICAEAN DOGMAS. BOTH OF THEM ARE NOT THE ACTUAL EVOLUTION AS FOR AS I HAVE STUDIED. THE NATURAL DIRECTION OF EVOLUTION WAS LOST AND TO PSEUDO DIRECTIONS CAME. HOW EVER THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED IN POLINE CHRISTIANITY. ARIAN TENDENCY IS NOT ONLY DUE TO JUDAIC CHRISTIANY AND ITS INFLUENCE ON POULINE CHRISTIANITY BUT AN EFFECT OF VERY JUDAISM IT SELF. ATHANASIAN CHRISTIANITY IS DUE TO THE EFFECT OF ANTI JEWISH TENDENCIES IN POULINE CHRISTIANITY. IT IS HOPED THAT READERS MAY STUDY IT AND SEE A NEW APPROACH TO THE EVOLUTION OF TRINITICALDOGMAS FROM DOGMAS OF SOME ANTE NICAEAN FATHERS.