Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
P. 1
760491-485293

760491-485293

Ratings: (0)|Views: 155 |Likes:
Published by sabatino123

More info:

Published by: sabatino123 on Jul 17, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/23/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 
quinn emanuel
trial lawyers | san francisco
50 California Street, 22nd Floor, San Francisco, California 94111-4788 |
TEL
:
 
(415) 875-6600
FAX
: (415) 875-6700
W
RITER
'
S
D
IRECT
D
IAL
N
O
.
(415) 875-6339
W
RITER
'
S
I
NTERNET
A
DDRESS
 
peterklivans@quinnemanuel.com
quinn emanuel urquhart & sullivan, llp
LOS ANGELES
| 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90017-2543
 
|
TEL
(213) 443-3000
FAX
(213) 443-3100
NEW YORK
| 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor, New York, New York 10010-1601
 
|
TEL
(212) 849-7000
FAX
(212) 849-7100
SILICON VALLEY
| 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor, Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139
 
|
TEL
(650) 801-5000
FAX
(650) 801-5100
CHICAGO
| 500 W. Madison Street, Suite 2450, Chicago, Illinois 60661-2510
 
|
TEL
(312) 705-7400
FAX
(312) 705-7401
WASHINGTON
,
DC
| 1299 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 825, Washington, District of Columbia 20004-2400
 
|
TEL
(202) 538-8000
FAX
(202) 538-8100
LONDON
| 16 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7EG, United Kingdom
 
|
TEL
+44 20 7653 2000
FAX
+44 20 7653 2100
TOKYO
| NBF Hibiya Building, 25F, 1-1-7, Uchisaiwai-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0011, Japan
 
|
TEL
+81 3 5510 1711
FAX
+81 3 5510 1712
MANNHEIM
| Mollstraße 42, 68165 Mannheim, Germany
 
|
TEL
+49 621 43298 6000
FAX
+49 621 43298 6100
MOSCOW
| Voentorg Building, 3rd Floor, 10 Vozdvizhenka Street, Moscow 125009, Russia
 
|
TEL
+7 495 797 3666
FAX
+7 495 797 3667
HAMBURG
| An der Alster 3, 20099 Hamburg, Germany
 
|
TEL
+49 40 89728 7000
FAX
+49 40 89728 7100
July 12, 2012
V
IA
E
LECTRONIC
F
ILING
 
The Honorable Lisa R. BartonActing SecretaryU.S. International Trade Commission500 E Street, SWWashington, DC 20436Re:
Certain Semiconductor Chips and Products Containing the Same,
Inv. No. 337-TA-753
 Dear Acting Secretary Barton:On behalf of Respondents, enclosed for filing is a public version of Respondents’Combined Reply to Rambus’ and the Staff’s Responses to the Commission’s Notice of Review,which was filed on June 1, 2012 in the above-referenced investigation.Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have questions regarding this filing.Respectfully submitted,
 /s/ Peter A. Klivans
Peter A. Klivans
 
03990.51797/4780864.12
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C.Before The Honorable Theodore R. EssexAdministrative Law Judge _________________________________________ In the Matter of))CERTAIN SEMICONDUCTOR CHIPS)Inv. No. 337-TA-753AND PRODUCTS CONTAINING THE SAME ) _________________________________________)RESPONDENTS’COMBINED REPLY TO RAMBUSAND THE STAFF’SRESPONSESTO THE COMMISSION’S NOTICE OF REVIEW
PUBLIC VERSION
 
03990.51797/4780864.12
i
TABLE OF CONTENTSPage
I.ISSUE 1: CLAIM CONSTRUCTION (DALLY PATENTS)............................................1A.1(a): “Output Frequency” Refers to Cycles Per Second, and Cycles, in theContext of the Dally Patents, Has a 1:1 Relationship with Data Rate.....................11.“Fact” 1 Is Incorrect: Dally Transmits OneBit Per Cycle, NotTwo..............................................................................................................22.“Fact” 2 Would Support Respondents’ and Staff’s Construction................33.Rambus’ Construction Excludes Preferred Embodiments...........................54.Rambus IgnoresMost of the Dally Specification and ReliesEntirely on Two Passages that Do Not Concern “OutputFrequency”...................................................................................................55.Rambus Mischaracterizes Poulton and Simms’s Testimony.......................6B.1(b): Regardless of Whether the Commission Specifies a Data Rate for theClaimed “Output Frequency,” the “Output Frequency” Claims Are Invalid..........71.Widmer Alone Renders The “Output Frequency” Claims ObviousUnder Rambus’ Construction......................................................................72.The “Output Frequency” Claims Are Invalid Even If theCommission Declines to Require A Specific Data Rate..............................9II.ISSUE 2: VALIDITY.........................................................................................................9A.2(a): The ALJ Correctly Found Motivation to Combine Widmer and Ewen..........9B.Secondary Considerations......................................................................................12III.CERTAIN PRODUCTS DO NOT INFRINGE DALLY (ISSUES 3A, 3B, 3C)..............13A.3(a): Disablement of Cisco Productsand SL500..................................................13B.3(b): The Appropriate Standard for Infringement of the Dally Claims................15C.3(c): Rambus Failed to Prove Infringement of Method Claims 39, 40, and42 of the ‘494 Patent..............................................................................................17IV.THE ALJ CORRECTLY FOUND THE BARTH PATENTS INVALID INLIGHT OF THE PRIOR ART (ISSUE 2A, 2B, 2C, AND 2D/BARTH)........................18
PUBLIC VERSION

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->