Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
NRA Motion Re Related Cases

NRA Motion Re Related Cases

Ratings: (0)|Views: 85 |Likes:
Published by Christopher Baker

More info:

Published by: Christopher Baker on Jul 18, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/18/2012

pdf

text

original

 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE NINTH CIRCUITEDWARD PERUTA, et. al.,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.California, San DiegoCOUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et. al.,Defendants-Appellees. No. 10-56971D.C. No. 3:09-cv-02371-IEG-BGSU.S. District Court for Southern
APPELLANTS’ NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL RELATED CASESAND STATUS THEREOF
C. D. Michel (S.B.N. 144258)Lead CounselGlenn S. McRoberts (S.B.N. 144852)Sean A. Brady (S.B.N. 262007)MICHEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C.180 East Ocean Blvd., Suite 200Long Beach, CA 90802Tel. No. (562) 216-4444Fax No: (562) 216-4445e-mail:cmichel@michellawyers.com Paul D. ClementBancroft PLLC1919 M Street, N.W.Suite 470Washington, D.C. 20036Tel. No.: (202) 234-0090e-mail: pclement@bancroftpllc.com Paul Neuharth, Jr.(S.B.N. 147073)PAUL NEUHARTH, JR.,APC.1140 Union St., Suite 102San Diego, CA 92101Tel. No.: (619) 231-0401Fax No.: (619) 231-8759e-mail: pneuharth@sbcglobal.netCounsel for Plaintiffs-Appellants
Case: 10-56971 07/10/2012 ID: 8244725 DktEntry: 91 Page: 1 of 22
 
TABLE OF CONTENTSPAGE(S)I. NOTICE
.....................................................1
II. INTRODUCTION
.............................................1
III. RELATED CASES AND STATUS
...............................3
A.
 Richards v. Prieto
.........................................5
B.
 Birdt v. Beck 
.............................................7
C.
 Baker v. Kealoha
.........................................9
D.
Thomson v. Torrance Police Department 
....................11
E.
 Mehl 
and
 Rothery
 
Appeals
................................12
1.
 Mehl 
.............................................13
2.
 Rothery
...........................................15
IV. CONCLUSION
..............................................17
i
Case: 10-56971 07/10/2012 ID: 8244725 DktEntry: 91 Page: 2 of 22
 
TABLE OF AUTHORITIESPAGE(S)FEDERAL CASES
 Baker v. Kealoha
,
 
 No. 12-16258 (9th Cir. May 30, 2012)
........................passim Birdt v. Beck,
 No. 12-55115 (9th Cir. January 17, 2012)......................
 passim District of Columbia v. Heller 
,554 U.S. 570 (2008).....................................11, 14, 15
 McDonald v. City of Chicago
,561 U.S. 3025 (2010)....................................13, 15, 16
 Mehl v. Blanas
, No. 08-15773 (9th Cir. April 8, 2008).........................
 passim Nordyke v. King 
,
 
611 F.3d 1015 (9th Cir. 2010)...................................14
 Nordyke v. King 
,664 F.3d 774 (9th Cir. 2011)..................................2, 14
 Richards v. Prieto
, No. 11-16255 (9th Cir. May 19, 2011).........................
 passim Rothery v. County of Sacramento
,Case No. 09-16852 (9th Cir. August 25, 2009)..................
 passimSykes v. McGinness
, No. 08-2064 (E.D. Cal. July 27, 2009).............................17
ii
Case: 10-56971 07/10/2012 ID: 8244725 DktEntry: 91 Page: 3 of 22

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->