Fig. 2.
Charles Wheatstone. (From
Engineers & Electrons,
Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 1984.)
Fig. 3.
The “Electropult.” (From E. R. Laithwaite and S. A. Nasar,“Linear-motion electrical machines,” P
ROCEEDINGS OF THE
IEEE,vol. 58, no. 4, Apr. 1970.)
After many experiments, he became convinced that linearmotors were not the answer for the cotton industry, but hewas equally sure they had many applications elsewhere. Heshowed that large linear motors (and, indeed, large electro-magnetic machines generally) are more efficient than smallones and get even better when they are made larger. Theyshould be good for driving trains, he thought, and he devotedmuch effort to unsuccessful attempts to persuade railwaycompanies to adopt linear motors. While at Manchester, heconductedexperimentsataLocomotiveWorks,wherehehad100 yards of test track equipped with a vertical aluminumplate between the running rails. The aluminum plate was the
Fig. 4.
A tracked hovercraft. (From E. R. Laithwaite and S. A.Nasar, “Linear-motion electrical machines,” P
ROCEEDINGS OF THE
IEEE, vol. 58, no. 4, Apr. 1970.)
Fig. 5.
Mechanical details of a conveyer system using a linearmotordrive.(FromE.R.LaithwaiteandS.A.Nasar,“Linear-motionelectrical machines,” P
ROCEEDINGS OF THE
IEEE, vol. 58, no. 4,Apr. 1970.)
stator of a linear motor whose moving part was electromag-nets carried on a four-wheeled trolley. The weight of the ve-hicle was carried on the wheels, but the newly invented hov-ercraft, devisedbyChristopherCockerell,offerednewpossi-bilities. The idea of a “tracked hovercraft,” a vehicle (Fig. 4)suspended on an air cushion and driven by a linear motor,was investigated for a few years, but for reasons that are notat all clear the British Government, which had sponsored the
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, VOL. 89, NO. 2, FEBRUARY 2001 215
Leave a Comment