Embed Doc
Copy Link
Readcast
Collections

CommentGo Back

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728

AMSUNG

’

UPPLEMENTAL

DENTIFICATION

RIOR

URSUANT

U.S.C.

§ 282

ASE

00334

RMWC

ASE

02298

RMWC

ASE

00244

RMW

Attorneys Listed on Signature Page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISIONRAMBUS, INC.,Plaintiff,v.HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., et al.,Defendants.Case No. C 05-00334 RMW

SAMSUNG’S REVISED WITNESS LISTFOR JANUARY 19, 2009 TRIAL

Date: January 19, 2009Location: Courtroom 6, 4th floorJudge: Hon. Ronald M. WhyteRAMBUS, INC.,Plaintiff,v.SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al.,Defendants.Case No. C 05-02298 RMWRAMBUS, INC.,Plaintiff,v.MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., et al.,Defendants.Case No. C 06-00244 RMW

Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 3045 Filed 01/09/2009 Page 1 of 8

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728

C:\DOCUME~1\MORSE\LOCALS~1\TEMP\NOTES87C577\SAMSUNG WITNESS LIST - JANUARY 2009 PATENT TRIAL_#303271.DOC

Pretrial Statement, Section F January 9, 2009Case No. 05-00334-RMW; 05-02298-RMW

Pursuant to the Court’s Standing Order Re: Pretrial Preparation, Samsung herebysubmits this list of witnesses it will call, or may call to testify in the January 2009 Patent Trial inthe above captioned cases. The following list supplements the witnesses and intend-to-call / may-call expectations that are identified in the Joint Manufacturers Witness List, incorporated hereinby reference, and reflect Samsung’s current expectations regarding which witnesses will and maybe called for additional, Samsung-specific live testimony in the validity, infringement, anddamages phases of the January 19, 2009 patent trial.This list does not include (1) rebuttal witnesses, (2) witnesses to be called duringany trial on issues reserved for the Court, including willfulness, or (3) witnesses that may becalled by playing or reading prior sworn testimony. The following witness list was drafted basedon Samsung’s current expectations, and Samsung reserves the right to call or not to call any of these witnesses based on Rambus’s witness list, time allocations, resolution of pretrial motions, orother change of circumstance. Samsung expressly reserves the right to play testimony from anylisted witness that is unavailable pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 32(a)(4). Samsungalso reserves the right to use prior testimony in addition to or as an alternative to live testimony,consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 32 and any other applicable Federal Rule of CivilProcedure or Federal Rule of Evidence.

Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 3045 Filed 01/09/2009 Page 2 of 8

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728

C:\DOCUME~1\MORSE\LOCALS~1\TEMP\NOTES87C577\SAMSUNG WITNESS LIST - JANUARY 2009 PATENT TRIAL_#303271.DOC

Validity Phase WitnessesIntend to Call May Call

Jay ShimJ.B. Lee

depending on arguments made by Rambus:

Jon KangCharles DonohoeY.H. ChoiC.H. KimK.H. KyungJ.W. LeeSeong Soo KimDong Yang LeeMian Quddus

Infringement Phase WitnessesIntend to Call May Call

J.B. LeeMichael Runas

Damages Phase WitnessesIntend to Call May Call

Jay ShimJ.B. LeeW. Christopher Bakewell

depending on the outcome of pending motions

:W.S. ChungJane KimCharles Yu

Intend to call to establish admissibility of documents:

Ira BlumbergSteve ChenJohn DanforthCraig HampelGary HarmonSharon HoltHarold HughesAvo KanadjianJoel KarpDavid MooringJared Smith

Laura Stark Neil SteinbergGeoff Tate

depending on arguments made by Rambus:

Jon KangCharles DonohoeSeong Soo Kim

Live testimony from many of the witnesses designated for document admissibility purposes maybe avoided with appropriate stipulations from Rambus regarding admissibility of documents. Inthe event these witnesses are called live, Samsung reserves the right to elicit testimony on subjectmatter beyond the admissibility of exhibits as described in the descriptions of testimony for eachrespective witness below.

Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 3045 Filed 01/09/2009 Page 3 of 8