Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Archibald v U.S. DOJ, et al. - 10 - DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SET CASE FOR TRIALDcd-36-0erged

Archibald v U.S. DOJ, et al. - 10 - DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SET CASE FOR TRIALDcd-36-0erged

Ratings: (0)|Views: 81|Likes:
Published by Jack Ryan
07/20/2012 10 RESPONSE re 8 MOTION for Trial filed by FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Soskin, Eric) (Entered: 07/20/2012)



07/20/2012 10 RESPONSE re 8 MOTION for Trial filed by FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Soskin, Eric) (Entered: 07/20/2012)



More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: Jack Ryan on Jul 20, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/13/2014

pdf

text

original

 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
 GEORGE H. ARCHIBALD, ))Plaintiff, ))vs. ))UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF )JUSTICE, ) 1:11-CV-2028 (RBW))FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ))KATHRYN RUEMMLER, )Counsel to the President ))Defendants. )________________________________________________)
DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONTO SET CASE FOR TRIAL
 On July 6, 2012, Plaintiff filed a document styled “Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’Answer and Motion to Set Case for Trial.” (dkt. no. 7) (“Pl. Resp.”). The “motion” portion of this filing requests that a schedule be set “for motions and . . . for trial.” Id. at 3.“FOIA cases are typically and appropriately decided on motions for summary judgment.” Moore v. Bush, 601 F.2d 6, 12 (D.D.C. 2009). Defendants intend to seek summary judgment as to the entirety of Plaintiff’s claims. Accordingly, it would be appropriate at thispoint to set a briefing schedule for summary judgment motions, but setting a trial schedule wouldbe premature. Defendants suggest that the Court schedule motions for summary judgment to befiled on or before August 31, 2012, with responses due on or before September 21, 2012, andreplies due on or before October 5, 2012. A proposed order is attached.
Case 1:11-cv-02028-RBW Document 10 Filed 07/20/12 Page 1 of 3
 
2Dated: July 20, 2012 Respectfully submitted,STUART F. DELERYActing Assistant Attorney GeneralJOSEPH H. HUNTDirector, Federal Programs BranchELIZABETH J. SHAPIRODeputy Director
__/s/ Eric J. Soskin__________
ERIC J. SOSKINTrial AttorneyUnited States Department of JusticeCivil DivisionFederal Programs Branch20 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Room 5134Washington, D.C. 20001Tel: (202) 353-0533Fax: (202) 616-8202Eric.Soskin@usdoj.govCounsel for Defendants
Case 1:11-cv-02028-RBW Document 10 Filed 07/20/12 Page 2 of 3
 
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
 I certify that a copy of this filing has been served by Fed Ex on Plaintiff, George H. Archibald,on July 20, 2012, at the address below:George H. Archibald27 West Main StreetNo.1Berryville, VA 22611 /s/ Eric J. SoskinERIC J. SOSKINTrial Attorney
Case 1:11-cv-02028-RBW Document 10 Filed 07/20/12 Page 3 of 3

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->