• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
 
R-eprinted frornttreSurnmer199O IssueofGround Wctter JVonitoring Revievv
N{a.grreticSur\ze}zing for EBuriedN,{etallicObjects
bv Larrv BarrowsandJudith E. RocchioAbstractField testswere conducted to determin€ representative total-intensitymagnetic anomalies due to thcpresenceofundergtound storage anksand 55-gallon steel drums. Three differentdrumsweresuspendedroma non-magnetictripod and theunderlying field surveyed witheach druminan upright and a flippedplusrotatedorientation.Atdrum-to-sensor separationsof I I feet, the anomalies hadpeakvaluesofaround 50gamnasandhalf-widthsaboutequal tothedrum-to-sensor separation. Remanentand induced magnetizations werecomparable; crushing one ofthedrums significantly reduced both. Aprofileover asingle underground storage ank had a 1000-gamma anomaly,which was similar to the modeledanomaly due to an infinitely long cylinder horizontallyrnagnetizedperpendicularto its axis. Aprofileover two adjacent tanks had a.smooth350-gammasingle-peak anomaly even though modelsof twotanksproduceddual-peakedanomalies.Demagnetizationcould explain whycrushingadrumreduced itsinduced magnetizationand why two adjacent tanksproducedasingle-peakanomaly.A 40-acre abandoned landfillwas surveyed on a 50- by 100-footrectangulargridand along several detailedprofiles;Theobserved field had broadpositiveand negative anomalies that were similar to modeledanomalies dueto thickness variationsina layerof uniformly magnetized material.It wasnotcomparable to the anomalies due toinduced magnetizationin multiple, randomly located,randomly sized, independent spheres,suggesting hat demagne-tization may have limited theeffective susceptibility ofthe landfill material. Adifferent 6-acre site suwey conductedon a10- bylo-foot gridwas analyzed to determinethe maximum station spacing and line separation that couldhave been used. Essentially, allofthe anomalies at this site v/ould havebeenresolvedby a survey conducted on a20-by 20-footgridand the larger anomalieswould have been detected by a 50- by 5O-footgrid.IntroductionMagneticsurveys havetraditionallybeen usedbygeologistso locatechangesnrocktypesuchas mightbe associatedwithore bodies, aultcontacts,origneousintrusives. Anothercommonapplicationsdeterminingtheprobabledepth tobasementbeneath sedimentaryrocks. For theseapplications, heprincipalgeologicvari-ableisthedistribution offerromagneticminerals,mainly magnetite,withintheearth.Thetheory andsur-veyproceduresare described in a variety of references(e.g.,GrantandWest 1965,S.E.G.1966,Parasins 975,Nettleton1976,Telfordand others1977,RobinsonandCoruh 1988).Aparticularlyconcise eviewof surveyingwithportablemagnetometerssgivenbyBreiner(1973).Magneticsurveysare usedinhazardouswastesiteinvestigationsolocate55-gallondrums,undergroundstorage tanks,buriedpipes,and theedges of coveredlandfills. Theseapplicationssually nvolveshallow ronorsteelobjects,whichinfluencethewaythesurveysshouldbeconductedandinterpreted.Tyagi andothers(1983)describecontrolledfieldtests nwhichsingledrumsandclustersof drumswereburied at variousdepths. The testsite was.thensurveyed withavarietyofgeophysicalinstrumentsincluding a total intensitymagnetometer. They foundthe magnetic detection limitfora singledrumwas6 to l1 feet below the surface andthat the boundariesof a dump site containing steeldrums canbeeasily determined.Gilkeson and others(1986)describea magneticsurveyofa seriesof landfilltrenchesthat had been used to dispose of steel drums.Theyfounda distinctivepatternof magnetic highs overthetrenches andlowsovertheintertrenchcorridors.They notedthatthesesignals were similar to the calcu-latedmagnetic anomaliesdue toinfinitelylong rectan-gularbodies having dimensionscomparabletothetrenchesandamagneticsusceptibility ofk:0.1Asexplained later, a susceptibilityofthismagnitude isexpected foramasscontainingmanydisseminatedferrousmetalobjects.Frischknechtand others(1985)and Jachensandothers(1986) describeield tests andmodels that demonstrate theuseof magneticsurveysto locatecovered abandonedwell casings.Thisapplica-tion is important becauseabandonedwellsarepotentialpathwaysfor theverticalmigration ofcontaminatedgroundwater.Theyfoundstrongpositiveanomaliesover thewellsthatclosely resemble modelsof simplemagneticdipoles having thepositive poleatthe topof
 
thecasing and the negativepoleatitsbase.Inthispaper,thetheory behind magneticsurveyingisbriefly reviewedand the fieldtests conductedo deter-mine thetotal-intensity magneticanomaliesdue to 55-gallonsteel drumsand undergroundstorage tanksarebrieflydescribed. Theanomaliesdue to the three drumstestedhadpeakamplitudes ofaround 50gammasandhalf-widthsapproximatelyequalto the11-footsepara-tion betweenthe drumand the magnetometersensor.The half-widthisthe distancebetween the twosides ofan anomalyat intensitiesof one-halfof itspeakvalue.Theseanomaliesweresimilar to thosedue to isolateddipolesbutinadditionto the magnetizationinduced bythe earth'sambient field,both remanent magnetizationand demagnetizationseemedto affect thesignals.Remanentmagnetization isapermanentmagnetizationthatisindependentof theambient field. Demagnetiza-tion isa limit onthe strength of inducedmagnetizationwithinan object imposedby the internalfielddue tothe objectitself. Thesurveyed anomalydue tooneundergroundstoragetank wassimilar to thatdue to aninfinitelylongcylinder magnetizedperpendicularto itsa1i5.However,the anomaly due to twoadjacenttanksalsoresembledhatof a singlebody. Again, remanentmagnetizationanddemagnetizationare thoughttoaffect thesesignals. ftheresultsdescribedhereinarerepresentative,hen thestrengths of anomaliesdue todrums andtanks maydepend more on their volumethan ontheir metalcontent. Also, it maybe difficulttoinfer fromthe shapeof a magneticanomaly theexact .locationand natureof the causativebody. Demagnetiza-tion mayalso influencethe magneticsignals from land-fills containingmany metalobjects.One site survey isdescribedn which thetotal-intensity fieldresembledthat dueto a uniformly rnagnetizedlayerofvaryingthicknessbutdidnot resemblethat due to an assem-bledge of magneticallyndependentobjects.One impli-cation isthat magneticsurveys may not beable tolocateconcentrationsof metal objects,such as drums, withina landfill.Another isthat successful andfillsurveys maybeconductedon arelativelycoarsestationgrid.Thedatafrom a secondsurveyconducted on a l0- by 10-footsquaregridwere analyzedto deterrnine the maxi-mum stationspacing thatcould have beenused. Forthisparticularsite, essentiallyall of thesignal wouldhave been resolvedwithstations on a 2O- by 2O-footgridand thestronger anomalies wouldhavebeendetected ona 50- by 5O-footgrid.TheoryTheGeomagnetic EnvironmentThesignalsina magneticsurvey arepartiallytheresultof,andstrongly influencedby, the arnbient mag-neticfieldof the earth. As a firstapproximationthisgeomagneticfield resembleshatdue to a single axialdipole whose negativeor south magneticpoleistowardthegeographicnorthpole.Thestrength ofthisfieldvaries from60,000gammasnear thepoles,where itplungesverticallyinto theground,to 25,000gammasnear theequator whereitparallelstheearth'ssurface.In anyparticularregion theambient field isdescribedbyits intensity,inclination(orangle to the horizontal),and declination(orangle to geographicnorth). Breiner(1973)includes arge-scalemapsof theseparametersfor thecontinentalUnited States. Fabinoand others(1979)givemoredetailed maps.Thegeomagneticfield isnot constant both inthesense of diurnalvariations of several tensofgammasandoccasionalperiodsofrapid,irregular, transientvariations(magneticstorms).Thediurnalvariationscanbe removed fromsurvey data bydrift corrections basedon either regularbase station ties or the record fromafixedbase-station magnetometer.Magnetic storrns varyin intensityand can makesurveying impractical.TheSpaceEnvironmentServicesDivisionofthe NationalOceanic and AtmosphericAdministrationprovidesrecorded nformationon the currentlevelof theseluc-tuations(telephonenumber(303)497-3235)and afore-cast of theprojectedlevel forthenextfivedays(tele-phonenumber(303)497-3171).t is normallydesirableto knowthe conditionoftheearth'sfieldduring eachday ofa fieldsurvey.Magnetic AnomaliesFollowing Telfordandothers1976,p.111,Equation3.1 ), the magnetic fieldat an externalpoint (f,due toa magnetizedbody canbe expressedas:
dr*)=dI I Jil,-).f#dv(ri
volumewhere:ilisapositionvector withinthe body,Vis thegradientoperator,fi'-i"is the distancebetween the externalpointandpositionwithin thebody,.indicatesthe vector dotproduct,andill(tiis the net magnetizationper unit volume.The netmagnetization isthe vector sum of inducedpu s re manent magnetization s. Remanenrnagnetiza-tionisaperrnanentmagneticmomentperunit volumeandinducedmagnetization istemporary magnetizationthatdisappears f the material is notin a magnetic field.Generally, the induced magnetization isparallelwithandproportionalto the inducing field.Algorithms forcalculating the magneticfields due touniformlymagne-tized, simplegeometricshapesaregivenin severaltexts(e.g.,Grant and West 1965,Nettleton1976,Telfordandothers1976,Robinsonand Coruh1988).Magneticfields are vectorsandmagnetometersmea-sure some attribute of this vector field. Protonpreces-sionmagnetometersmeasurethemaximum intensity(ortotallength of the vector)andfluxgatemagnetome-tersffr€ErSurehe intensity inaparticulardirection(orvectorcomponent).Whenused with dual sensors,mag-netometers also measure thegradientof the attribute;usually in the verticaldirection.Thenet magnetic field to which the magnetometerresponds isthe vectorsum ofthe fielddue to localmagnetizedmaterials and theambient field of theearth.Figure Ishowsthe total intensityfieldduetoa simplemagneticdipole,theambient field of the earth,and thetotal-intensityanomaly that would hedetected during
 
asurvey.Inthiscase,hemagnetizationof theobjectisparalleltothe ambientfield(inducedmagnetization).Thereisamagneticlowtothenorthof thecenterofthebodyanda largerhighto thesouth.EffectiveSusceptibilifyMagneticsusceptibility,k, isthedimensionlessro-portionalityc onstantrelatinginducedmagnetizationwithinabodytotheinducingfield. In general,heinduc-ingfieldis thevectorsumof boththeearth'sambientfieldandthefielddueto theobject tself.Thisfeedbackis referredtoas demagnetizationand isexpressedas areductionin theeffectivesusceptibilityof theobject:
,k,no,
Krff=
I+)rk.",where:k*u,,isthematerialsusceptibility,andA isthedemagnetizationactor.GrantandWest(1965)describethephysicalbasisfordemagnetizationand thederiva-tionof thisrelation.Demagnetizationfactorsaredependentonboth theshapeof theobjectanditsorientationtotheambientfield.Fora sphere )t=7r?r:noffnalto theaxisofthecylinder)r=2 n;and normaltoaflatsheetX=4tr(Strangway1967).Figure2shows heresultingelationsbetweeneffectiveand materialsusceptibilityfor thesesimpleshapesandorientations.Notethatformaterialsusceptibilityesshanaboutk:0.05,theeffectiveandmaterialsusceptibilitiesareapproximatelyequal.Mostrockunitshavesusceptibilitiesesshanthis,therefore,demagnetizationdoesnot usuallyaffect theinterpreta-tionofgeologicsurveys.However,ferrousmetalshavesusceptibilitiesf tensor hundreds,herefore,heeffec-tivesusceptibilityof ferrousmetalobjects,likesteeldrums,islimitedbydemagnetizationto afewtenths.Ifthe ferrousmetalcontentofa landfillis severalpercentof thevolume,henheeffectivesusceptibilityoflandfillmaterialwouldalsobe limited.nthiscase, ocalconcen-trationsofmetalwithinthe landfillwouldnotbeexpectedosignificantlyincreasehelocaleffectivesus-ceptibility.Demagnetizationalsolimitsthe applicabiliryof thealgorithmsusedocalculatehemagneticeffectsof sim-plemodels.Thesealgorithmsusuallyassumehatmag-netizationis uniformthroughoutthematerial,acondi-tionnotrealizedif thefieldduetothebodyitselfisirregular.Forhazardouswastesiteinvestigationsthereisa needtodevelopmagneticmodelingtechniqueshataccommodatedemagnetizationphenomena.Untilthisisaccomplished,magneticmodelsofferrousmetalobjects (includingthemodelsinthisreport)shouldbeinterpretedcautiously.FieldTestsS5-GallonDrumsTheobjectivesof thesetestsweretoestablishthemagneticsignalofa 55-gallonsteeldrumandtocomparethis resultwithanalyticalmodels.A secondaryobjectivewasto determinetheextenttowhichdemagnetjzationlimitstheeffectivesusceptibilityof asteeldrum.A 60-by60-foottestsirewaslaidout ina flatemptyTOTh'r-'lilrYl'lfdTf?'{lfdllglfc^}ndiltri'y{igu_leMagneticeffectof an solatedodymagnetizednthedirectionftheearth'smbientield.ThemeasuredotalTaglejlcntensifyshevectorumof theambientieldplustheielddue othebodv:
FuJ-
=E
x(Lii uJIc)lrrO\a
rP.ttitcYLH0tR
l!10rrllNATPLAI(ll0Suafal
0.0010
MATERIALUSCEPTIBILITYFlBure.Effectives.materialusceptibilityor severalim-pleshapes ndorientations.emagnetizationimitsheeffec-tive. usceptibilityoa_fewenths egardlessfthe susceptibilityofthematerial fromStrangway967, .455).-fieldandanearbybasestationwasselected.Surveystationswereat 3-footintervalsalongnorth-southines,spaced6feetapart(231stations).Inthecenterofthesitea non-magnetic(PVCpipe)tripodwasconstructedfromwhichthedrumsweresuspended.hedrumswere19feetabovegroundlevel;therefore,withthe8-footsensorheightof themagnetometer,thesignalsweresimilarto thosefromdrumsburiedat 3fbet (Figure3).Runningthesurveysbeneath,insteadof over,theobjectsreversedhe signalsthroughaneast-westine.Thisresultedna reversalofthepositionsofthepositivepeakandrelatedtrough.Thesitewas firstsurveyedwithan emptytripodtoestablishbaseline,whichwas removedromall subse-quentsurveys.Foreacllsurvey,theendsof thenorth-southlineswerefirstreadandlinearlydrift-correctedto thebasestationandthentheindividualstationswerereadand linearlydrift-correctedtothe lineends. Alldatawere relativeto the firstreadingat thebasestation
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...