-'
4
From:
Giessr'er,
]oho
To:
TaylorRobert;
.Blan.
.
AIM.
=rj
1i
Nakanishi.
To
n
Subject:
Re:
Info
from
sciencegroup
call
Date:
Tuesday,
March
29,
2011
4:43:39
PM
Agree,
the
two issues
steam
condensing causing
h2
explosivemixtureandand
loss
of
the ventpath
are
both
in
the
RST
document:
inert
by
purging
and
vent;
don't
fill
beyond
the vent.
The
issue
is
without
level
indication
youmay
lose
the
vent.
That
factors
into
the
thought
on
how
we
know
we
are
inerting
then
filling.
Thatto
me
is
something
we're
looking
at,
but tonot
fill
at
all
isn't
the
answer.
(Sent
from
Blackberry)
-Original
Message-
From:
Taylor,Robert
To:
RST01
Hoc;
Cook,William;
Scott,
Michael;Blarney,Alan;
Giessner,
John
Cc:
Jackson,
Todd;
Monninger,John;
Dorman,
Dan;
Miller,
Marie;
Ali,
Syed; Sheikh,
Abdul;
Way,
Ralph
Sent:
Tue
Mar 29
09:22:52
2011
Subject:
Re:
Info
from
science
group
call
Am
I
missing
something
here?
Which
units?
All
of
them?
Units
2
and
3
are
well
vented
alreadydue
to
the
failed
containments
and
ourrecommendationdocument recommends
inerting
firstwhich
is
what
the
Japanese are
making
preparationsto
do.
We
are
certainly
interested to hear where
thisgoes.
I
presume
we
will
here
wherethiscomes
out
at
the
6pm
EDT
call.
Sent
from
an
NRC
BlackBerryPahprl"
Tavlnr
-----
riginal
Message
-----
From:
RST01
Hoc
To: Cook, William;
Scott,
Michael; Blarney, Alan;
Giessner,John;Taylor, Robert
Cc:
Jackson,
Todd;
Monninger,John;
Dorman,
Dan;
Miller,
Marie;
Ali,
Syed; Sheikh,
Abdul; Way, Ralph
Sent:
Tue Mar
29
09:08:32
2011Subject:
FW:
Info from
science
group
call
FYI,
DOE
had
a
telecon
on
3/28 andrecommended
not
filling
the
drywell.
This
has not
yet
been
vetted
with
the
Consortium.
We
will
discussthis
at
the
1100
EDT
call.
-----
riginal
Message
-----
From:
Sheron,
Brian
Sent:
Tuesday,
March
29,
20117:21
AM
To:
Kelly,
John
E
(NE)
Cc:
Weber,
Michael;
Virgilio,
Martin;
RST01
Hoc;
ET01
Hoc
Subject:
FW:
Quick
science
group
call
today
-
7:00pm
EDT
John,
see
below.It was
our
understanding
that
all
recommendations
to
the
Japanesegovernment
weregoing
to
be
first
vetted
internally
within
the
U.S.
Last
weekendour
RST
vetted
the
severe
accident
management recommendations
with
NRC, DOE,
INPO,
EPRI,
NR,
Bettis,
KAPL,
GEH
and
got
alignmentbefore
the recommendationswere
sent
to
the
site
team..
II
It
was
also
my
understanding
that
Secretary
Chu
agreed
to
this
process
with
Chairman
Jaczko.
Is
DOE
going
to coordinate
the
vetting
process,
or
do
you
want
to
send
it
over
to
the
NRC'sRST
and let
them
vet
it?
-----
riginal
Message
-----
From:
Lee, Richard
Sent:
Monday,
March
28,
20117:44
PM
To:
Sheron,
Brian
Subject:
RE:
Quick
science
group
call
today
-
7:00pm
EDT
Brian:
Done
already.
Dana
and
I
were
on
thephone.
Dr.
Holdren
is
checking
on
theconsensus
view
reachedyesterday
on
the
recommendation
of not
flooding
the
drywell.
Without
having any
water
level
measurement
in
the
drywell,
concerns
are: (i)
condensing
thesteam
which
may
cause
a
hydrogen
burn;(ii)
too
much
water
in
the
drywell
resulting
in
blocking
the
vent
path.
The
blocking
of
the vent path
will
be
very
serious,
because
at
this
time,
it is
now
the
only
path
forrelieving
pressure
in
the
RCS.
Apparently,
Dr.
Holdrens
spoke
to
our
Chairman
and
was
told
by
our
Chairman
that
he
understood
the
NRC
still
favors
flooding
the
drywell.Dana
and
I
both
said
the
concern
ofblocking
the vent
path
is
a
majorconcern
especially
we
do
not
know
or ableto
measure
the
water
level
in
the
drywell.
I
also
mention
that
in
case
of
molter corematerialbreached
the
RPV,
ANL
(under
DOE) is
calculating
the
MCCI;
and
NRC
had
also
provided
a
few
days
agoour
estimate
of
FCI
loads
do notpose
a
treat
to
the
containment.
He
was
happy
that
we
look
into
FCI
already
and
gave
him
assurance
therecommendation
is
the
correct
one
to putforth.
The
rest
of
the
people
call
in
(Bob
Budniz?,
Dick
Garwin,
....)
agreed.
Hence,
therecommendation
not
to
flood
the
drywell
will
be
advanced
by
U.S.
to the
Japanese.
RichardFrom:
Sheron,
Brian
Sent:
Monday,
March28,
2011
7:07
PM
To: Lee,Richard
Subject:
Re:
Quick
science
group
call
today
-
7:00prm
EDT
Great,
thx.
From:
Lee, RichardTo:
Sheron,
Brian
Sent:
Mon
Mar
28
17:11:42
2011
Subject:
RE:
Quick
science
group
call
today
-
7:00pm
EDT
Brian:
I
will
call
in
to
see
what
it
is all
about,
Richard
From:
Sheron,
Brian
Sent:
Monday,
March
28,
2011
4:35
PM
To: Lee,
Richard
Subject:
Fw:
Quick
science
group
call
today
-
7:00pm
EDT
From:Adams, Ian
<Ian.Adams@Hq.Doe.Gov>
To:
DL-NlTsolutions
<DL-NITsolutions@nnsa.doe.gov>;Owens,
Missy
<
Missy.Owens@hq.doe.gov>
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
Pages From C143073-02CX --13 March 28th, 2012 - The Consensus View on the Recommendation of Not Flooding the Drywell - Units 2 and 3 Are Well Vented Already Due to Failed Containments
98
Reads
0
Readcasts
318
Embed Views
Get Scribd Mobile
To get Scribd mobile enter your number and we'll send you a link to the Scribd app for iPhone & Android.We've sent a link to the Scribd app. If you didn't receive it, try again.
We'll never share your phone number.
Recommended
More From This User
Notes
Load more
