Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
If Size Does Matter, The Oregon Ducks Have More Bulk Than The SEC

If Size Does Matter, The Oregon Ducks Have More Bulk Than The SEC

Ratings: (0)|Views: 2 |Likes:
Published by FishDuck
http://fishduck.com/2012/07/oregon-ducks-have-bigger-players-than-the-sec/
http://fishduck.com/2012/07/oregon-ducks-have-bigger-players-than-the-sec/

More info:

Published by: FishDuck on Jul 27, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/27/2012

pdf

text

original

 
Originally posted on FishDuck.com:http://fishduck.com/2012/07/oregon-ducks-have-bigger-players-than-the-sec/If Size Does Matter, The Oregon Ducks Have More Bulk Than The SECReported by Josh White on July 27, 2012 inFishWrap, FishWrap Archive | 1 CommentNot sure when exactly, but it must have started back sometime around 2006 or 2007…that’s when the nation began to take notice of the new wave spread offensive schemes being installed in Eugene, the flash and bravado turning many into new Duck fans, while others scoffed at it just being a gimmick, not real football. Perhapsinstead it was the ever-changing and polarizing uniform modifications coinciding with the switch in offensive philosophies that had something to do with calling national attention to this wacky wide-open high scoring team that led to the change in perception.Regardless of what instigated it, Oregon asked to be in this spotlight, and thebacklash has been consistent, the stigma that has been slapped upon Oregon for the last few years being a generalized topic by broadcasters and media pundits alike–that Oregon is a “small” football team compared to others in the top 25.Perhaps it was the high-profile losses against Boise State, Ohio State, Auburn,or LSU (four of the six total losses Oregon has suffered since Chip Kelly becamehead coach). Those games on the big national stage had a common theme, the Oregon offense struggling at times to move the ball against a mostly NFL-ready defensive front fielded by those respective teams (well, excluding BSU).From a historical standpoint, Oregon has been mostly seen as a small-ish west coast school that was hard to find on a map, harder to get to, and assumed ably the role of scrappy undersized underdog that could bite if teams didn’t prepare wellfor them.Although the David vs. Goliath mentality was played out in the media when Oregonfound success against higher-ranked opponents, it was far more a metaphor thana physical reality in regards to actual average size of the Oregon teams. From the Bill Musgrave era to Joey Harrington leading last-second comebacks, Oregon’s resiliency took center stage over any shortcomings in scale though the media was all too happy to emphasize any individual mismatches in bulk. This was usually played out subtly, with a good-for-them patronizing passive-aggressive stance comparing the Ducks akin to the little engine that could.But when switched to the spread, the rhetoric and propaganda exploded. SuddenlyOregon was solely a “finesse team,” perceived as too small for big boy football played by major programs or in SEC country. Outsiders found themselves curious aboutOregon, they wanted to know why was Nike and Phil Knight so passionate about aninconsistent and somewhat obscure team?Ok, so the Ducks might have NFL-or-better-caliber facilities, cutting edge uniforms, locker rooms, training techniques, and playbooks; but they still needed bigger players to fill out those uniforms before they could truly compete against the nation’s elite, right? To some it seemed Nike had bought the cart before they had the horses. But Oregon football is deeper than that.The moment Rich Brooks and his staff (many of whom are still coaching football in Eugene) led Oregon to a victory at the 1989 Independence Bowl, those coaches,this team, this University, this town, and these fans have been building something unique. Five years later when Kenny Wheaton scored in a moment that will never be forgotten by Oregon fans propelling Oregon to a Pac-10 conference champions
 
hip and Rose Bowl, it sent off a shock-wave of support for the team that has continued to build steam ever since, culminating in a national championship appearance and Rose Bowl victory.I the 90
 
s Oregon offensive lineman Steve Hardin (#77) tipped the scales at 330+, but even he was dwarfed by fellow OL Tasi Malepeai, playing around 360. Who said these Ducks were small?Like a tsunami wave, each season-and critics might say each uniform combination-has been a step forward in building towards this exact type of run of success onthe field fans have enjoyed the last five years or so. The Ducks may not have always had the most talent, size, or depth, but they have played smarter and faster, bigger and better with each year.Other teams may not want to admit it, but the biggest waves started by those past Ducks have yet to hit shore. Fans of other teams may be hoping the loss of LaMichael, starting a new QB, or the “certain-to-be” harsh pending NCAA sanctions willsomehow ebb the Ducks’ tide, or at least knock them off their perch a little.Sure, the Ducks may have been undersized, under-skilled, or otherwise lacking depth compared to the nation’s top 10 in some of those years along the way, and fortoo many seasons a few injuries here or there would expose a hole in the armor derailing an otherwise special group.But, this next season?It might be time to finally throw all of that out the window. This year, despitethe undersized talking point that will inevitably be associated with spread offenses permanently, the Ducks have the size to go along with all of the speed andsizzle.The season kicks off for the defending Rose Bowl Champions in a little over a month, the launch of the 2012 season officially commencing earlier this week withPac-12 Media Day. This day is a small annual oasis in the desert-wasteland thatis the long summer months, as the anticipation to college football season grows. The Ducks this year had Chip Kelly, Kenjon Barner, and Michael Clay representing the men of Oregon. The Q&A at these events is a mere formality, the real story isn’t what is said as much as the signal the event provides–football is on the horizon.In one of the first questions directed towards the Ducks, specifically to seniorlinebacker Michael Clay, a reporter permeated the myth further, asking about “lacking what the tougher, heavier defenses have in the south, and how do you shakethis stereotype?”Chip Kelly ultimately interjected, and provided an answer, citing “we have guys that go up to 295 and 300, and they run as well as anybody in the country…”Clearly Coach Kelly, the players, and Oregon fans alike have grown weary of having to constantly respond to this stereotype, that spread offense = lack of sizethat will get exposed vs. a “real” defense. Match this with “the spread doesn’t preparean athlete for the NFL” and “it’s just a gimmick offense” and you’ve got the trifecta of ignorance, a frustrating display of misconceptions permeated by media and those who feel perception defines reality.Like many, I’ve grown weary of hearing about the supposed size disadvantage stereotype, I mean, how much bigger can they really be? I wonder if the Ducks are actually bigger than some of the SEC teams?What I discovered may surprise you.
 
As a team, Oregon is in fact bigger than not only many of the SEC schools, but it is difficult finding a team in the country as big in average girth as the Ducks are this year. Sounds crazy, right? Believe it…depending on exactly how “bigger” isdefined.What parameters define a “big” player? How much weight, or height, is enough to appease the media and opposing fans into dropping the undersized label? Sports medicine, training regimens, and nutrition have come a long way in the past few decades, leading to bigger-stronger-faster athletes (coincidentally, Nike’s motto). Whereas not long ago a 300 lb. player was considered massive, even by NFL standardsmost offensive linemen averaged around 250 during the days of the prolific “hogs,”today it raises an eyebrow if linemen weigh under three-bills.Haloti Ngata was a massive imposing force at Oregon around 340 for much of his careerSo is a 6’4” 299lb player big? Absolutely, by general public standards. But by football standards, is it enough?Looking through team rosters on ESPN.com, specifically at the basic height/weight dimensions of players, the measurements appear in direct contradiction to the “undersized” label so casually thrown out by the perceived masses.Oregon currently has 28 players over 6’5” and/or 300 lbs. This number dwarfs most teams in the country, yes even those in the big bad SEC. Yes, 28 is more than eventhe “biggest” SEC teams like LSU (23) and Alabama (22). In fact, Oregon has more ofthese 6’5″/300 players than Arkansas (23), Georgia (21), Auburn (19), South Carolina (18), and Florida (18).And it doesn’t stop with these “tiny” SEC players. (Maybe their “small” guys are bigger than our “small” guys?) The Big-10 is traditionally known as the home of 3-yards-and-a-cloud-of-dust football, where bulk on bulk is played out in the trenches, the bigger/heavier team ultimately winning out. No teams exemplify this traditional perception of the conference more than Michigan and Wisconsin, yet the Oregon Ducks are bigger than Michigan (18), and even Wisconsin (22) too! The other midwesttraditional power, albeit not a member of the Big-10 but long associated with its style of play, Notre Dame were close (24), but still short of Oregon’s tally.Looking at the Big-12, home of corn-fed hog mollys built to pave running paths through defenses, sure enough Texas (23) and Oklahoma (22) were smaller too.So who exactly is undersized? Who relies solely on finesse rather than bulk? Thenational perception is inherently flawed considering the sheer volume of “big” players currently on the Oregon roster.Oregon is generally considered to be the fastest team in the country, but who would have guessed they are among the very biggest as well? In fact, Florida State(28) was the only team I could find with as many “big” players as the Ducks, a teambeing hailed in the preseason as a possible national championship contender, primarily because of the supposed superior size along the Seminoles defensive line.No other Pac-12 team comes close to reaching Oregon’s tally in 6’5″/300 bodies. USC (19) predictably leads the way in competing with the Ducks in this category, withStanford (17), and UCLA (17) not too far behind. Washington (16) and Cal (14) are not exactly tiny either. Within the state of Oregon, the Ducks have way more than Oregon State (13) and Portland State (9) combined.So, there you have it. The Ducks are just as big if not bigger than any team fou

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->