the programme in response to invitations from the Government and local people.Despite its name ABCD does not emphasise physical change in agriculture andbusiness. It is focused on the transformation of the participants thinking. Theprogramme is based in three communes (22,000 people) and aims to animate changesin community awareness and respond to felt needs and problems in partnership withlocal communities, through the creation of an environment of change.
"One of the distinctive features of the programme is its emphasis on the localcommunities agenda. Its funding is constructed in such a way that it is not tied to anagenda created by an outside agency. Funding is flexible to follow the agenda set bythe people."
While the main objectives of the 7yr programme concern the villages and theirmovement towards a dynamic proactive community, one of the objectives was that thestaff would form a local NGO at the end of the programme. The process in the villagesleads to potentially sustainable development within the village. However, the resourcesof the village are limited and it seemed unreasonable to expect villagers to activelyreplicate the programme to new villages. There is some limited influence of proactivevillages on their near neighbours, but in order to achieve a planned replication of theprogramme it was decided that the staff might become a local NGO.
Ownership
Herein lies the first potential problem. The decision to include the formation of a locallybased organisation for replication in the project objectives was taken by the staff of theNorthern NGO with only very limited consultation. The five year proposal was written ata time when there were only two Khmer staff for ABCD, and so very limited discussionswere held with these two people. Thereafter it was a task of the expatriates to animatethe Khmer staff to some form of ownership of this objective. This of course is not thebest approach. The rest of the programme emphasises that people should be free toset their own agenda, not to be made to conform to a pre-set agenda. And yet thisobjective was pre-set and the staff have been asked to conform to it.
In institutional terms, the objective was left very broad. It describes a local organisation.At the time of writing the proposal it was not clear if such a thing as a Khmer NonGovernmental Organisation would be appropriate or even possible. Therefore theoptions ranged from a local NGO to perhaps a team within the District Government.The essence of the objective was that there would be a institutional structure that wouldfacilitate replication of the programme with Khmer ownership. Funding may well need tocome from external sources because replication is a social service, but that fundingcould be North/South aid or perhaps from within the Government budget.
As the programme draws to a close, it seems that a Khmer NGO is a feasible optionand the staff have been discussing and working towards this for a number of years. Inthe early years the subject was raised by the expatriates and some interest was shownby the Khmer staff. After a period of cooling, where the expatriates did not push theconcept, the Khmer staff approached the expatriates and asked about the details of theKhmer NGO. These were the first signs of true ownership. In the last two years detailed
Leave a Comment