©
Evergreen Systems, Inc. July 2006
Developing the Business Value of ITIL 2006 Survey Results
In Q3 2006 Evergreen conducted a survey on developing the business value of ITIL at the September itSMF NationalConference. One hundred (100) IT managers, directors and executives from 90 companies, organizations and institutionsparticipated in the survey, designed to:
•
Gauge their organization’s commitment to ITIL initiatives such as Change, Problem and Incident Management.
•
Assess how thoroughly these organizations had analyzed and re-engineered their processes to conform to these coreinitiatives.
•
Calculate how many of these efforts had been quantified and measured via standardized metrics.
•
Identify if the targeted projects were being delivered via phases and milestones.A very broad range of industries was represented, lead by Financial Services, Insurance, Retail, Government, Education,Health Care, Energy/Utilities and Pharmaceuticals.This paper provides an analysis of how leading companies approach ITIL process improvements and how these sameorganizations are analyzing their primary pain points and calculating the metrics of improvements.
Key Findings
•
Respondents rated service quality, efficiency/cost reduction and IT/business alignment as their top drivers for ITILinitiatives. 80 % of respondents rated service quality as the top business driver for ITIL initiative, with cost reduction(74%) and alignment between IT and the business (64%) rating second and third in importance.
•
Resistance to organizational change (78%) and unproven business value (50.5%) were rated as the most significantbarriers to ITIL initiative adoption.
•
57% reported that their current ITIL direction focuses on improvement of end-to-end IT service delivery, stressingchange, configuration and release management.
•
Top ITIL initiatives were identified as CMDB (64%), Incident and Problem Management (57%), Service Catalog (57%)and Change and Release Management (52%). Only 34% have a published ITIL strategy.
•
Less than half (45%) have analyzed their top 5 incidents by call volume, and of these only 31% have performed rootcause analysis on their top problems and less than 10% have business goals with ROI to improve these processes.
•
Less than 30% have baselined their top 5 change workflows end-to-end. Of these, less than 19% have re-engineeredthese and less than 10% have quantified risk reduction and quality/cost efficiency gains that could result from re-engineering.
•
Less than 19% have implemented four to five reusable change models based on risk and materiality.
•
Primary IT service management vendors were identified as BMC/Remedy (29%), HP/Peregrine (25%), CA (8%),Mercury (1%), Other (20%) and None (19%).
•
40% reported that 26% or more of their changes were emergency, short-notice changes.
•
Fully 44% still use an informal risk management process for Change Management.
Table of Contents
Overview..................................................................................1Key Findings.............................................................................1Background.............................................................................2Survey Findings......................................................................2Key Recommendations.........................................................4Summary and Conclusions..................................................4
Leave a Comment