Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Encore Capital Group (NASDAQ:ECPG) dba Midland Funding LLC, Affidavit filed in United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals detailing vast violations of the FDCPA and wholesale violations of attorney ethical guidelines, Encore Capital involuntary chapter 7 bankruptcy petition being drafted

Encore Capital Group (NASDAQ:ECPG) dba Midland Funding LLC, Affidavit filed in United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals detailing vast violations of the FDCPA and wholesale violations of attorney ethical guidelines, Encore Capital involuntary chapter 7 bankruptcy petition being drafted

Ratings: (0)|Views: 136|Likes:
Published by Sheriff_Joe_Arpaio
Encore Capital Group - Midland Funding has concentrated exhaustively on profits without regard for acting within the constraints of the law. A result is the authoring of an involuntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition against Encore with creditors owed over one Trillion Dollars in FDCPA damages.
Encore Capital Group - Midland Funding has concentrated exhaustively on profits without regard for acting within the constraints of the law. A result is the authoring of an involuntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition against Encore with creditors owed over one Trillion Dollars in FDCPA damages.

More info:

Published by: Sheriff_Joe_Arpaio on Jul 31, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

08/02/2012

pdf

text

original

 
INTHE
UnitedStatesCourtofAppealsfortheSixthCircuit
ROBERTCLAWSON,et.al. Objector/Appellant,
v.
NO.11-3961 MARTHAVASSALLEandJEROMEJOHNSON, Plaintiffs/Appellees, MIDLANDFUNDINGLLC,MIDLANDCREDITMANAGEMENT,INC., ENCORECAPITALGROUP,INC., Defendants/Appellees.
VERIFIEDREPLYTOMIDLAND'SOPPOSITIONTOMOTIONTO INTERVENEANDMOTIONTOPARTICIPATEINORALARGUMENTASAMICUSCURIAE
NowComesproposedintervener-amicuscuriae,ScottHuminski("Huminski"), anddeposes,swearsandrepliestoMidland'soppositiontotheintervention-amicus curiaemotion,underoath,asfollows:
1.
MidlandFundingliedconcerningthedefaultofScottandDanaHuminskiina statecourtmatterinswornaffidavitsunderthepenaltyofperjury(the "PerjuredAffidavits").ThePerjuredAffidavitssworethattheHuminski'shad defaultedinStatecourtwhenatthattimethematterhadbeenremovedto federalcourtandtheHuminskishadfiledanswersandmotionstodismiss. 2.MidlandFundingattorneyswereservedwithpapersindicatingremovalto federalcourtoftheirStatecasesagainsttheHuminskistwicebythe HuminskisandMidlandwasalsonoticedtwicebythefederalcourts. Regardlessoffournoticesofremovaltofederalcourt,Midlandcontinuedto litigateintheStateCourtsandfiledthefourPerjuredAffidavits.Upon informationandbeliefthefourPerjuredAffidavitswereautomatically authoredandrobo-signedpursuanttoMidland'suseofrobo-litigation.
 
3.TheStateCourtPerjuredAffidavitswereauthoredandservedwhenthefour debtcollectioncaseswerependingbeforetheFederalCourts,nottheState courts.UponinformationandbeliefthePerjuredAffidavitswererobe-signed, robe-authoredwithoutpersonalknowledgeexactlyliketheaffidavitsin controversyinthisappeal. 4.Midland'sinstantfilingofJuly30,2012indicatesthatMidlandhasno problemwithcontinuingtoautomaticallyrobe-litigateinStateCourtsafter caseshavebeenremovedtothefederalcourtsandtomakefalse representationsinStateCourtsthatadefaulthadoccurred. 5.MidlandiscontinuingtorelyuponthePerjuredAffidavitsinStateCourtina fraudulentattempttoobtainfalsedefaultjudgmentsagainsttheHuminskis. MidlandhasfailedtowithdrawthePerjuredAffidavitsandfailedtoalertthe StateCourtsofthefalsestatementscontainedinthePerjuredAffidavitsasthe Huminskisdidnotdefault,theyfiledtimelyanswersandmotionstodismiss thedebtcollectionlitigation.ThePerjuredAffidavitsarefraudulentnon- personalknowledgerobo-signeddocuments. 6.Currentlythefourfalse,misleadinganddeceptivePerjuredAffidavitsof Midlandstandbeforebothfederalandstatecourts.Midlandrefusestoobey attorneyethicalguidelinesandwithdraworalertthecourtstotheproblems withtheaffidavits.InsteadMidlandchoosesinthislitigationtodown-play, mitigateandobfuscatethenatureoftheveryunethicalandfraudulent affidavitsinviolationoftheFDCPAandwithtotaldisrespectforthedutyto truthfullyrepresentfactstothisCourt.Midlandmuststoprelyingon deceptionandfraudincourtstoadvanceitsbusinessgoals. 7.ThestatecourtlitigationthatresultedinthePerjuredAffidavitswasfiled againstJaneDoe
&
ScottHuminski.Agooglesearchon"ScottHuminski Wife"revealsonmultipleentriesofpage
1
ofthesearchresultsthatDana HuminskiisScottHuminski'swife.Uponinformationandbelieftherewasno attorneyreviewofthe4statecourtcasesbeforefiling(robe-litigation)orthe Midlandattorneysaregrosslynegligent,unethicalandincompetent.
2
 
8.Oncethefourstatecourtcaseswereremovedtofederalcourt,2DistrIctCourt JudgesorderedMidlandtofilecorporatedisclosures.Midlanddidnotfile corporatedisclosuresbythedatesorderedbytheDistrictCourtJudges.Upon informationandbelief,removaltofederalcourtisnotanticipatedbyMidland's robe-litigationschemeorMidland'sattorneysaregrosslynegligent,unethical andincompetent.9.WhenMidlanddidfilefederalcourtcorporatedisclosures,theyfiledtwo disclosuresinonecaseandnoneintheotherfederalcase.Eventually, Midlanddidfileasimilarlylatethirdcorporatedisclosure.Allcorporate disclosureswerefiledfarafterthedatesorderedbythefederaljudges.Upon informationandbeliefthenegligenceofMidlandregardingthefilingof corporatedisclosureisaresultofrobe-litigation. IO.MidlandfiledfouressentiallyidenticallawsuitsagainsttheRuminski'swithin afewmonthsofeachother.Threeofthelawsuitswerefiledconcurrently. Uponinformationandbelief,thefilingoffourlawsuitsquadruplingtheCourt coststoMidland(andtheindigentdefendants),violatingresjudicata, prejudicingindigentdefendantsandviolatingattorneyethicalpreceptswasa resultofrobe-litigation(onelawsuitgetsautomaticallyfiledforeachaccount Midlandpurchasesregardlessofhowredundantandvexatious).
11.
WhenIaskedMidlandonthetelephonewhytheyfiledfourlawsuitsinsteadof one,theirleadcounselresponded,"BecauseIcan!".Uponinformationand beliefthisconductconstitutesanattorneyethicalviolation,abuseofprocess, fourFDCPAviolations,harassmentandotherforbiddenactivity. 12.Ruminski
v,
CorsonescitedbyMidlandwasthefirstcaseinAmerican jurisprudencetoestablishtheindividualFirstAmendmentrighttocourthouse accessandresultedininjunctivereliefagainstthedefendantsandover $700,000indamages,costsandfeespaidtoRuminski,yetiscitedbyMidland assomesortofmisconduct. l3.Ruminskiv.Heretia[sic]citedbyMidlandisacaseattackinganArizona statute'sfacialconstitutionality,isonappealintheNinthCircuit.Thejudge

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->