• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
THE STRUGGLE TO CHANGE PERCEPTION
Some of those who have suffered at the hands of Child Protective Services have warnedme to be very brief. They say that Senators and Representatives have little time to readmore than a page or so. I understand. I also believe I understand some things about people.When Mr. James Rodger Brown testified before the US house Ways and Meanscommittee about Organized Crime in the US government, I can just see in my mind’s eyehow some would take it seriously and some would smirk. As I see it, at least, Mr. Brownwould interpret any systematic, organized illegal acts done in concert with others directlyor indirectly as Organized crime. While I am sure this may be off a bit, I am positiveunder his definition, the Inquisition, Slavery and the Salem witch hunts would beincluded. (1)I think most of us, when we think of organized crime, think of the Mafia. We envision participants who know that they are involved in unlawful pursuits and who intentionallywant to be part of such unlawful practices.Regardless of how evil the inquisition, the witch hunts and slavery were, people didn’tsee them selves as participating willingly in evil or unlawfulness.This last fact makes the Family justice system all the more dangerous. Like during theinquisition, most people involved just knew they were part of a righteous cause, exceptthe people who suffered. No commissions, if there were any, appointed to see if theslaves were being well taken care of came back with a recommendation that the solutionwas to end slavery as a practice. Whole industries were dependant on it. What this didwas to make a large share of people hold their peace lest they lose a livelihood. Now ask yourself this question. Would anyone without very strong convictions pitthemselves against an industry whose beneficiaries brought so much money to stores, blacksmiths and other seemingly unrelated endeavors? Would your representative or senator do much more than hear your story? That’s what has happened in every State andUS Congressional hearings, to many. There have been few meaningful changes.Wither you were deemed a witch, heretic or slave, in times past, public hysteria, falsescience and other misinformation was always involved. People thought they knewsomething that they didn’t and there were no powerful or easy avenue to those afflicted toexpress themselves in a way to cause the masses to quickly reevaluate their thinking.When looking in the past, we cannot imagine how anyone could have done the thingsthey did. They were evils and we suppose ourselves to be better than they.A curious incidence, in the Bible is where the religious leaders of Jesus’ time made astatement that if they had lived in the time of the old prophets; they would not have
 
 participated in their slaughter, like their Fathers did. Jesus mentioned that they wereindeed the children of their fathers and would do the same thing as their fathers did.We are the children of our fathers and we are allowing the destruction of thousands of children and families for all the same reasons people allowed injustices in the past.1.Everyone knows there is an epidemic of child abuse, witches, heretics etc. Theythink they know the facts. The information comes from the authorities that benefits as protectors and in some cases confiscates property, money.2. Mandatory reporters that are praised if they make the authorities happy or whenmoney and or property is taken. 3. Secrecy, to protect reporter’s identity and the authoritys reasoning process,taking away the danger of loss of face the system could incur with the people4. Retaliation: Making an example out of those who resist 5. Making sure there is a vested interest for those in power to leave the system as is. 6. Control the nomenclature and interpretation of laws 7. Have a growing body of demonstrably false knowledge. That is used anyway.Since they are the authorities, most accept their words as fact.All of this has happened in the Child protection industry. From the 1980’s many peoplewent to Jail on the Ideas fostered upon us by these so-called professionals, who hadabsolutely no science to back them up. A few examples will suffice.There was the Idea that Doctors could tell by the size, shape and irregularities of a child’svagina if they had been sexually assaulted. Later real scientific studies by Dr. McCannand others proved all the assumptions were way wrong. Showing that all the so-calledsigns were about the same in all kids regardless if they were abused or not. It helped fewof those jailed on false Science. Some in the CPS industry still use this false information.The late Eighties and early 1990s were rife with accusations of day care workers abuse of children, “Children don’t lie about sex the experts said” Wrong! These children grew upand told the truth. Researchers found that if they allowed Children to have anatomicaldolls and questions were asked them about well observed examinations given to them bydoctors, they were all over the map, some describing things the doctors never even cameclose to doing. The type of questions and the way they were asked brought different kindsof things to the kid’s minds. These things were enough to have sent the physicians to jail.Some CPS industry partners still use the anatomical dolls.If anyone was alive at that time, they should remember the hysteria.
 
DHS controls the meaningful nomenclature and since they are the mandated authority,everyone listens. Police departments that normally know how to investigate normal casesshow deference to DHS’ validation methods. They are only looking for those things that prove a parent guilty of something. They follow not those things that show a person ‘sinnocence. They routinely hide this information from the court. Judges will often sidewith DHS even when the evidence exonerates the individual. They only need to hireexpert witnesses that the parents do not have the money to match. Even if the expertsreally say nothing or even contradicts themselves.Like the inquisition or witch hunts, if you are a mandatory reporter, you better reportanything that possibly could be child abuse. This is true even if there is a thousandinnocent ways it could happen. You can’t get prosecuted, but if you don’t, you could.About 65% of children taken by DHS were taken and kept even after they remainedunsubstantiated allegations.You are guilty till you prove yourself innocent.Over time, with a 30 to 70 percent attrition rate, the good people leave as they learn whatis going on. Also, over time DHS learns which professionals are willing to treat themwith deference that lends weight to their cases. They stick with these people, makingthem very well off professional therapists and doctors etc. These people will do what ever DHS wants.The ACLU and others have found that there is false documentation and outright lies brought to the court under these parent unfriendly conditions, DHS will win 90% of thetime.You see as DHS and the Judge becomes closer and closer partners, there is less and lessof a true adversarial system. No one is a true neutral Judge. The parent cannot win. Theseare some of the reasons the retired New York Supreme Court Judge Brian Lindsey said inhis statement above that the Family court system “guarantees” the break up of families.All this because the title IV-E monies have made a whole industry surrounding it intofriends. Not as conspirators, at least not a majority, but nonetheless as subsystems in avery insidious enterprise. Even though the computer may be the only damaged part of acar, it affects all other subsystems.Judges’ bench guides” recommends” finding probable cause, if only temporarily for “TITLE IV-E money’s sake. (4)The DHS case worker then tries to get additional information often having nothing to dowith the original allegation. Finding a home dirty the day of visitation, finding a brokenwall socket or no food in a refrigerator, can change your world. Finding an ex spouse or a
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...