• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Your World View, the Foundation for Your Everything
While watching Hardball’s Chris Matthews interview Nancy Pelosi, I wasreinforced with the understanding of how ones world view shapes all that they believe. Matthews and Ms. Pelosi ridiculed anyone that could still believe inthe God of the Bible and creation. Leader Pelosi disdainfully stated that shedid not see how anyone could NOT believe in evolution.I thought about my days in college and how I found it relatively easy to stumpmy professors about evolution. But what one believes about this subject iseven more profound than may immediately appear.If there is no God, then there are no absolute rules. No one has a right to tellanyone else what they should do or not do. There is no evil; Societies onlymake social compacts that most of them feel that they can live with. Hitler,the Son of Sam or the worst persons that you can think of were only victimsof their society. It’s survival at all cost. Lion against lion. This is evolutionwhen taken to its natural logical end. A nation could end up doing anything.You get the same result, if there is a God and you decide to make him in your own image.There is trepidation wither we believe in a God we make up or wither wedon’t believe in God, if either is taken to it logical end at the whim of human beings. Somebody will sooner or later, go off the deep end. But I amdigressing from my point a bit. Now I am not one that believes that Science and the Bible are at odds. I havenot found that to be the case. From childhood till now, I have loved science. InHigh School, you would likely find me doing experiments while my friendswere partying. To this day I find the universe and the Bible fascinating. Itenhances and does not stymie understanding as the person most oftenmentioned beside Einstein as the greatest scientist of all times, Isaac Newton, proved. We don’t need help from any of these men to show the reason manystill believe in creation. Is it just silliness as Ms. Pelosi suggested?
LOGIC
 
and the fundamental reasons that I could easily defeat myevolutionist professors: (simply)
Although, I was taught evolution from my childhood through college, I foundsome illogical assumptions involved. Let me illustrate absurdity by an absurdstory.We wake up one morning on another planet. We have no memory of where wecome from or why we are there. On this planet are great stone structures thatwere built by a long extinct race of beings. Over time two
ideas
develop. One
 
is that the structures were made by nature. The other theory is that beings builtthose structures.This, by the way is not just a story, it is historical to what man has doneregardless which idea was prevalent at different times. Now, let’s get back tothe analogy.
Fact:
The evidence in total only will vindicate one of these theories. It won’t prove the false assumption.
Axiom: If I accept either theory as absolute without accepting that thereis scientific information that pertains to both, either substantiating orrefuting them, I cannot prove either.
That would be like finding foot printsof some kind of animal in the house and deciding that it is a chicken withoutknowing what a chicken’s foot tracks look like.Get that thought in your head, so I can get through this easily and withoutcomplicating information.We will remember this little rule.I found in college, that some professors as do some scientists refuse to check the tracks. They find a reason to believe and ignore the reasons not to. I havelong said that modern secular science is a RELIGION. Let’s check out
one
of that religion’s beliefs and the flimsiness on which it stands.
First:
Macro evolutionist theory and the Design theory both deal with theconcept of God. This is a fact that neither side seems to want to admit.Modern Secular science believes that when you reverse time, the universe willarrive back to the big bang event. The beginnings of which they say iswithout, beyond and transcends the laws of physics. Without these laws of  physics, there is no hope of understanding first beginnings according to them.One thing this sort of language does is declare that prior to what we knowtoday as physics; there existed an unknowable
cause
of what we have today. Acause that was great enough to present us with the universe.
Thanks professor, for the sermon about God.
Secondly, after the universe exists:
Here, the evolutionist is most powerful because they will show all how learned they are about past eventsand the biology of plants and animals. They sound very impressive.Ask any evolutionist secular scientist to pick any animal that they know andfollow the tracks. Tell him to demonstrate what in nature caused the changesin whatever prior creature, step by step, to get to the animal that they chose.
 
You will find that there is NO SCIENTIST that can do this. This proves thatthey did not know what the chicken tracks looked like. They are just making awild guess.
Adaptation:
Adaption is their most powerful single argument. Animals, insects and germsall adjust to their surroundings. Most powerful to those that have bitten intothe AXIOM that there is no other choice.Professor, I would say, adaption is a deficient change mechanism to bringabout new forms of life. In fact a chicken adapts to its environment to surviveas a chicken and not as a monkey. All life forms have this ability. Now if youcan show me some fossils demonstrating how it gradually changed forms over millions of years, I will believe you. In fact professor, the chicken would belong dead. Nature can change an animal in seconds to survive. This is as if itwas designed that way for survival. Otherwise how can anyone say that theyhad to develop that form to survive and it took millions of years to do so?That would insure the non-survival of that animal.Also Professor, since it is assumed that all the millions of forms of lifeevolved from lower forms, show me any animal along with their long list of slight changes till it makes the animal what it is that we see today.Professor, there is simply no excuse for this. The books should be full of millions of transitional forms. Oh no you don’t professor, those old drawingsof different kinds of human looking creatures, are just that, drawings. Besides,modern human bones have been found older than the few ape-like bones thathave been found. There are NO TRANSITIONAL FORMS. This should beeasy. Transitional forms should be ever where bones are found.If he dares say, there are transitional forms. I will ask to see actual pictures.There are none.
CONCLUSION
So, what is this all about? It is about man saying “I have the right to dowhatever it is that I want to do. You see having the freedom to do so is notenough. The BELIEVERS accept it because they want what is being sold.Even religious people shop around to find something that is most like whatthey want and when religion held the pre-eminence, those in power fought tokeep logical minds from threatening their dominance.I say RELIGION, because truth is not synonymous with either of these waysof thinking, but at the heart of both is wither or not there is a God and whatthe answer means to the believer.
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...