Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
5Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
DC - Taitz v Astrue Appeal - 2012-08-02 - Motion to Recall Mandate

DC - Taitz v Astrue Appeal - 2012-08-02 - Motion to Recall Mandate

Ratings: (0)|Views: 62 |Likes:
Published by Jack Ryan

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: Jack Ryan on Aug 03, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/26/2012

pdf

text

original

 
 
·,
~·.
 
i'vlall
Room
JUL.
3
0
2012
Dr
Orly Taitz ESQ
Un\ted.
Stat~s
Court
9f
~.rre;:tls
· '
Dtstnct of
Columbta
Ctrclllt
29839 Santa Margarita s eRancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688Ph.949-683-5411 Fax 949-766-7603
US
COURT
OF
APPEALS
UNITEDSTATES COURT
OF
APPEALS
FOR
DISTRICT
OF
COLUMBIA
CIRCUfT
J
u
3 0
2012
CLERK
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUITDr. Orly Taitz, ESQ,Appellant,
v
Michael Astrue,Commissioner
of
Social Security,Appellee
Demand to withdraw/revoke unlawfully issued mandate.Demand to investigate nefarious activity/corruption in the US Court
of
Appeals for the District
of
Columbia
Appellant herein Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ filed an appeal
of
the decision by theUS District Court judge Royce
C.
Lamberth to refuse her Freedom
of
Information 5USC 552 request for release
of
the SS-5 (application) to aConnecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425. Taitz provided affidavits
of
a licensed investigator Neil Sankey, licensed investigator Susan Danielsand former Senior Deportation officer with the department
of
HomelandSecurity John Sampson showing that this Connecticut Social Securitynumber was issued in the state
of
Connecticut to a resident
of
Connecticutand later illegally assumed by Barack Hussein Obama. Obama also releasedhis tax returns in 2010 and forgot to flatten the PDF file, whereby the fullSocial Security number assumed by Obama became visible to millions
of
people.
It
was indeed the Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425,which was previously reported by the three investigators, listed above. Taitz
USCA Case #11-5304 Document #1387271 Filed: 07/30/2012 Page 1 of 9
 
also provided the court with evidence, showing Obama using other forgedidentification papers, such as a forged birth certificate, which is acircumstantial evidence confrrming Social Security fraud and illegal use
of
aSocial Security number
of
another, as people with forged birth certificateshave to resort to using stolen Social Security numbers. Taitz argued that theapplication for the number in question needs to
be
released, as it is beingfraudulently used and it is a matter
of
national security. Judge Lamberthbecame de facto complicit with Obama and denied the complaint by Taitz.Later three judge panel
of
this court rubber stamped the decision byLamberth.Taitz received the notification
of
the court that the fmal mandate will notissue until the petition for reconsideration or en bane hearing is submittedand heard. Taitz submitted a timely petition for an en bane hearing. She alsosubmitted a supplemental brief. In flagrant violation
of
its own notification
of
July
25
2012
some unidentified employee
of
this court issued a mandatebefore the full court had an opportunity to hear the case en bane and issueits' opinion.I.
Mandate
is unlawful,
as
issued while petition
for
hearing
en
bane was
under
consideration
and
before
the
decision
was
issued.This court issued its' ruling on May
31st,
when it specifically issuedan order stating that the mandate is being withheld pending submission
of
the petition for rehearing or petition for hearing en bane.
"The
Clerk isdirected to withhold issuance
of
the mandate herein until seven days afterresolution
of
any timely petition for rehearing
or
petition for rehearing en bane.See Fed.
R.
App.
P.
41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41." Exhibit 1 Order by panel Rogers,Griffith Kavanaugh.
On May
31st
Taitz filed a timely petition for an en bane hearing. (Exhibit
2,
Docket
of
Taitz v Astrue
10-5304)
Before the full court had anopportunity to issue its' decision
on
a Petition for
En
Bane Rehearing,some employee
of
this court went ahead and issued a mandate andviolated the prior order
of
this court, the Appellants right for an en banehearing and usurped the right
of
this court to actually issue a ruling enbane, which this court is currently considering. This appear to be anunprecedented level
of
corruption
by
some employees
of
this court, thesecond most important court in the nation after the Supreme Court
of
theUnited States. Just based on the violation
of
this courts own rules and
USCA Case #11-5304 Document #1387271 Filed: 07/30/2012 Page 2 of 9
 
standing order, an unlawful mandate needs to be nullified/ reversed.Moreover, there has to be an investigation in identifying an individualwho took it upon himself to illegally issue a mandate, while the case isstill before the full court and no decision was made. An individual, whoengaged in such act needs to be relived
of
his duties
of
an employee
of
this court and needs to be criminally investigated, as this is a matter
of
national security. Taitz provided an undeniable evidence showingBarack Hussein Obama usurping the U.S. Presidency while using a stolenSocial Security number from a state where he never resided. A courtemployee, who issued such mandate is complicit in Social Security fraud,elections fraud and committed an act
of
treason, as he/she aided andabetted in the usurpation
of
the US Presidency
by
virtue
of
use
of
forgedand fraudulently obtained identification papers. After an unlawfulmandate issued by a clerk is nullified, this court needs to expedite the enbane hearing on the matter
of
Obama' s use
of
a stolen Social Securitynumber.
II
Full
court
needs to expedite en
bane
reversal
of order
by
Rogers,Griffith
and
Kavanough.
The order issued in the case by the panel
of
Rogers, Griffith andKavanaugh represents a clear error
of
fact, abuse
of
judicial discretionand a judicial misconduct exposing this very court to charges
of
complicity with the Social Security fraud, identity fraud, elections fraudand use
of
forged and stolen identification papers, committed by BarackObama, it also represents an act
of
treason,
of
a high court aiding andabetting usurpation
of
the US Presidency by virtue
of
use
of
stolen andforged identification papers.Judges Rogers, Griffith and Kavanaugh confmned the ruling by thelower court that the Social security application xxx-xx-4425 should notbe released as expectation
of
privacy exceeds the right
of
public to know.
"The district court correctly concluded that disclosure
of
the requestedinformation "would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion
of
personal· privacy." 5 U.S.
C.§
552(b)(6). Appellant has not demonstrated any validpublic interest
in
disclosure to balance against the substantial privacy interest
at
stake. See Horowitz
v.
Peace Corps. 428 F.3d 271, 278 (D.C. Cir. 2005) ("Ifthere is no public interest
in
the disclosure
of
certain information, 'something,even a modest privacy interest, outweighs nothing every time."' (quoting Nat'lAss'n
of
Retired Fed. Employees
v.
Horner. 879 F.2d 873, 879 (D.C. Cir.1989)). Order by Judges Rogers, Griffith, Kavanaugh.
a.
This court erred in asserting that there will be an unwarranted invasion
of
privacy. This court wrongfully completely ignored the evidence
USCA Case #11-5304 Document #1387271 Filed: 07/30/2012 Page 3 of 9

Activity (5)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
Jack Ryan added this note
Not only that, but the docket she attaches to this ridiculous "pleading" shows no mandate issued in this case. All that, setting aside the fact that this so-called "motion" is irrelevant gobbledygook nonsense.
Jack Ryan added this note
One of the many displays of absolute stupidity of Orly Taitz. She either didn't read the mandate at all and/or can't keep her cases straight. No mandate had issued in this case. She published the docket on her blog which did not indicate a mandate issued. She was also informed of her "error". But the truth won't keep the PayPal button going.
la428 liked this
Jack Ryan liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->