Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
DC - Strunk - 2012-07-05 - Proposed Amended Complaint Wo Exhibits

DC - Strunk - 2012-07-05 - Proposed Amended Complaint Wo Exhibits

Ratings: (0)|Views: 38 |Likes:
Published by Jack Ryan
08/01/2012 5 MOTION for Leave to File an Amended Complaint by CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Amended Complaint(Note: Portions of these exhibits are illegible on ECF.))(zrdj) (Treated as Motion per Court's 6 Memorandum and Order) (Entered: 08/01/2012)
08/01/2012 5 MOTION for Leave to File an Amended Complaint by CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Amended Complaint(Note: Portions of these exhibits are illegible on ECF.))(zrdj) (Treated as Motion per Court's 6 Memorandum and Order) (Entered: 08/01/2012)

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: Jack Ryan on Aug 03, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/11/2013

pdf

text

original

 
Case 1:10-cv-00486-RCL Document 5-1 Filed 08/01/12 Page 1 of 464
Seill v Seal DCD
20
I
O-cv-004S6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT
OF
COLUMBIA
----------------------------------------------------------------X
In the Quo Warranto and Qui Tam matter
of
the§United States
of
America (USA) and ex relator§
Christopher-Earl: Strunk
in
esse,593 Vanderbilt
Avenue-
#281Brooklyn., New York 11238(845) 901-6767 Email: cluis(i:z<strunk.ws
Civil Action: 10-cv-00486 (RCL)
Assign Date: March 24, 2010
SEALED CASE
0
Plaintiff,
§§
§
§§§§
§
!l
.,
"
"
.
,,,
'
'"'
'
v.
§
Barack Hussein Obama
II
(a.k.a Barry Soetoro)
§c/o The White House§1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Washington, District
of
Columbia 20500;
Defendant.
§§§§§
----------------------------------------------------------------X
(PROPOSED)
AMENDED COMPLAINTFOR QUO WARRANTOINQUEST AND
JURY
TRIAL
ON
DAMAGES
INTRODUCTION:
i
ll
:
....
Ex-relator Plaintiff Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse (Strunk), is self-represented without beingan attomey, having filed the Complaint assigned under seal to the Honorable
Chief
Judge Royce
C.
Lamberth March 24, 2010, and that Strunk provided the required time for the U.S.Department
of
Justice (DOJ) to decide,
but
DOJ passed on intervention. And as such on July 13,2010 Ex-relator Strunk filed a Motion to unseal and release the summons to respondent(s); andto wit the Court on standing dismissed the complaint without prejudice by the Memorandum andOrder
of
January 5, 2011; and that the Court construes the Complaint in its own right, forstanding to restore to the calendar requires that Strunk prove a particularized personal injury witha causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained must be likely, as opposed tomerely speculative, and the injury will be redressed
by
a favorable decision (see
Exhibit
A).Amended Verified ComplaintPage I
of
52
 
Case 1:10-cv-00486-RCL Document 5-1 Filed 08/01/12 Page 2 of 464
Seal v Seal DCD 20
I
0-cv-00486
I.
The gravamen
of
this action
is
that Strunk, as a registered voter enrolled in the New YorkState Republican Party in the 2008 election cycle and remaining so in the 2012 cycle, wrongfullysuffers from pains and penalties punishment injury stripping individual civil rights and libertywith damages imposed by the Federal and State Courts in New York; and that the injury toStrunk is directly caused by Barack Hussein Obama
II
(a.k.a. Barry Soetoro, a.k.a. BarackHussein Obama Soebarkah, a.k.a. Barack Obama and hereinafter known as "'DefendanC) bymalicious spoliation and concealment
of
evidence
of
misprision
of
a felony, sedition and treasoninvolved with his ineligibility to hold the office
of
President
of
the United States (POTUS); and
JURISDICTION
2. Pursuant
of
the above Introduction Strunk has four (4) pm1icular injuries and four (4)Federal issues described below and requests as an exception to the
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine
to
be heard regarding injury to Strunk caused
by
Barack Hussein Obama
II
the punitive President
of
the United States (POTUS) with Federal Rules for Civil Procedures (FRCvP) Rule
81
(A) (2), asthe USA and ex-relator Plaintiff who has additional Causes
of
action based upon his actualinjuries caused
by
Defendant
Obama's
failure to be eligible for the office
of
POTUS, and whoseacts
of
spoliation and concealment in the misprision
of
a felony to prevent discovety
of
hisineligibility is defined with
18
USC §4 according to the investigation and June 12, 2012Affidavit
of
Maricopa County Arizona
Sheriff
Joseph Arpaio (see
Exhibit B)
must
be
heard in aQuo Warranto Inquest; and that Jurisdiction would be had for Strunk and the United States
of
America (USA) as Ex-Relator(s) are Plaintiffs and or Ex-relator with 28 USC § 1345 in whichthe USA
is
in fact plaintiff, except as otherwise provided by Act
of
Congress. The district courtsshall have original jurisdiction
of
all civil actions, suits or proceedings commenced by the UnitedStates, or
by
any agency or officer thereof expressly authorized to sue
by
Act
of
Congress; andAmended Verified ComplaintPage
2
of
52
 
Case 1:10-cv-00486-RCL Document 5-1 Filed 08/01/12 Page 3 of 464
Seal v Seal DCD 20 I 0-cv-00486that this case is also done with 28 USC
§
1343 as a Civil1ights and elective franchise, in which(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction
of
any civil action authorized by law tobe commenced by any person:
(1)
To recover damages for injury to his person or property, or because
of
the deprivation
of
any right or privilege
of
a citizen
of
the United States, by any act done in furtherance
of
anyconspiracy mentioned in section 1985
of
Title 42;(2) To recover damages from any person who fails
to
prevent or to aid in preventing anywrongs mentioned in section 1985
of
Title 42 which he had knowledge were about to occurand power to prevent;(3) To redress the deprivation, under color
of
any State law, statute, ordinance, regulation,custom or usage,
of
any right, privilege or inununity secured by the Constitution
of
theUnited States
or
by any Act
of
Congress providing for equal rights
of
citizens or
of
allpersons within the jurisdiction
of
the United States;(4) To recover damages or to secure equitable or other relief under any Act
of
Congressproviding for the protection
of
civil rights, including the right
to
vote;that (b) For purposes
of
this
section-
(1) the District
of
Columbia shall be considered
to
be aState; and (2) any Act
of
Congress applicable exclusively to the District
of
Columbia shall beconsidered to be a statute
of
the District
of
Columbia; and as with State Action in WashingtonDC with 42 USC
§
1983; andThat with 28 USC
§
1357 for injuries under Federal laws, the district court shall haveoriginal jurisdiction
of
any civil action commenced by any person to recover damages tor anyinjury to his person or property on account
of
any act done by him, under any Act
of
Congress,for the protection or to enforce the right
of
citizens
of
the United States to vote in any State; andAmended Verified ComplaintPage 3
of
52

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->