Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
7Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Miami Beach City Attorney Jose Smith Balks

Miami Beach City Attorney Jose Smith Balks

Ratings: (0)|Views: 40|Likes:
Published by Ryan Webster
Is he hiding something?
Is he hiding something?

More info:

Published by: Ryan Webster on Aug 06, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

06/24/2013

pdf

text

original

 
THE MIAMI MIRROR – TRUE REFLECTIONS 
 
Page
 
1
 
of 
 
2
 
Miami Beach City Attorney Jose Smith
 CITY ATTORNEY BALKS!
Jose Smith refuses to explain a $26,741 write off 
By David Arthur WaltersTHE MIAMI MIRRORAugust 5, 2012MIAMI BEACH—Miami Beach City Attorney Jose Smith responded hastily with a personalinsult and begged the question when asked to provide public records and explain why FirstAssistant City Attorney Steven Rothstein, Esq. overruled Special Master Babak Movahedi’sAugust 11, 2011 denial to mitigate a fine of $29,261.34 and release a lien on a luxury Continuumcondominium (Case BV09001224). I had referred to his office’s “slipshod” proceduressomewhere in the first three articles of my series ‘Getting Ahead of The Job Con, appearing inthe
 Miami Mirror 
and in the
SunPost 
.The condominium owner, Margret Asgeirsdottir, wife to Skuli Mogensen, was cited for startingconstruction without a permit. The contractor involved, Jihad Doujeiji dba Sharron Lewis DesignCentral, who appeared from the documentation to be acting as the owner’s agent from thebeginning of construction, appeared on her behalf at the August 11 hearing to argue that she hadnot received proper notice. I received information from a confidential informant that theargument at the hearing was specious, that the notice was not really defective. The Order did notspecify findings of fact and conclusions of law other than “DENIED,” so we may assume theopposing argument was totally without merit. That Order was supposedly appealed to the CircuitCourt, but I could find no record of it actually being filed with the court. A terse directive was

Activity (7)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
Ryan Webster liked this
Ryan Webster liked this
Ryan Webster liked this
Ryan Webster liked this
Ryan Webster liked this
Ryan Webster liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->