Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword or section
Like this
2Activity
P. 1
Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty-Background and Current Developments, RL33548 August 3, 2012

Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty-Background and Current Developments, RL33548 August 3, 2012

Ratings: (0)|Views: 510|Likes:
Published by Constitutionalist
Federation of American Scientists: CRS reports that CRS is not authorized to release to the public.
Federation of American Scientists: CRS reports that CRS is not authorized to release to the public.

More info:

Published by: Constitutionalist on Aug 08, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

08/08/2012

pdf

text

original

 
CRS Report for Congress
 Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress
Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty:Background and Current Developments
Jonathan Medalia
Specialist in Nuclear Weapons PolicyAugust 3, 2012
Congressional Research Service
7-5700www.crs.govRL33548
 
Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty: Background and Current DevelopmentsCongressional Research Service
Summary
A ban on all nuclear tests is the oldest item on the nuclear arms control agenda. Three treaties thatentered into force between 1963 and 1990 limit but do not ban such tests. In 1996, the U.N.General Assembly adopted the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), which would ban all nuclear explosions. In 1997, President Clinton sent the CTBT to the Senate, whichrejected it in October 1999. In a speech in Prague in April 2009, President Obama said, “Myadministration will immediately and aggressively pursue U.S. ratification of the ComprehensiveTest Ban Treaty.” However, the Administration focused its efforts in 2010 on securing Senateadvice and consent to ratification of the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START).The Administration has indicated it wants to begin a CTBT “education” campaign with a goal of securing Senate advice and consent to ratification, but there have been no hearings on the treatyin the 111
th
or 112
th
Congresses. As of July 2012, 183 states had signed the CTBT and 157,including Russia, had ratified it. However, entry into force requires ratification by 44 statesspecified in the treaty, of which 41 had signed the treaty and 36 had ratified. Seven conferenceshave been held to facilitate entry into force, most recently on September 23, 2011. Nuclear testing has a long history, beginning in 1945. The Natural Resources Defense Councilstates that the United States conducted 1,030 nuclear tests, the Soviet Union 715, the UnitedKingdom 45, France 210, and China 45. (Of the U.K. tests, 24 were held jointly with the UnitedStates and are not included in the foregoing U.S. total.) The last U.S. test was held in 1992;Russia claims it has not tested since 1990. In 1998, India and Pakistan announced several nuclear tests. Each declared a test moratorium; neither has signed the CTBT. North Korea announced thatit conducted nuclear tests in 2006 and 2009. Since 1997, the United States has held 26“subcritical experiments” at the Nevada National Security Site, most recently in February 2011,to study how plutonium behaves under pressures generated by explosives. It asserts theseexperiments do not violate the CTBT because they cannot produce a self-sustaining chainreaction. The next U.S. subcritical experiment is expected in fall 2012 or shortly thereafter.Russia reportedly held some such experiments since 1998.The Stockpile Stewardship Program seeks to maintain confidence in the safety, security, andreliability of U.S. nuclear weapons without nuclear testing. Its budget is listed as “WeaponsActivities” within the request of the National Nuclear Security Administration, a semiautonomouscomponent of the Department of Energy. Congress addresses nuclear weapon issues in the annual National Defense Authorization Act and the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act.The FY2012 appropriation for Weapons Activities was $7.214 billion, and the FY2013 request is$7.577 billion. Congress considers a U.S. contribution to a global system to monitor possiblenuclear tests. The FY2013 request is $33.0 million, with another $3.5 million requested for  projects to improve the CTBT verification regime.This report will be updated occasionally. This version reflects the FY2013 budget request, a 2012study claiming North Korea may have conducted nuclear tests in 2010, and a March 2012 report by the National Research Council on the treaty, and makes other updates. CRS Report RL34394,
Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty: Issues and Arguments
, by Jonathan Medalia, presentsCTBT pros and cons in detail. CRS Report R40612,
Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty:Updated “Safeguards” and Net Assessments
, by Jonathan Medalia, discusses safeguards— unilateral steps to maintain U.S. nuclear security consistent with nuclear testing treaties—andtheir relationship to the CTBT. CRS Report R42498,
 Energy and Water Development: FY2013 Appropriations
, coordinated by Carl E. Behrens, provides details on stockpile stewardship.
 
Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty: Background and Current DevelopmentsCongressional Research Service
Contents
Most Recent Developments.............................................................................................................1
 
History.............................................................................................................................................1
 
 National Positions on Testing and the CTBT...................................................................................2
 
The North Korean Nuclear Tests...................................................................................................11
 
The October 2006 Nuclear Test...............................................................................................11
 
The May 2009 Nuclear Test....................................................................................................13
 
Other North Korean Tests?......................................................................................................15
 
The CTBT: Negotiations, Provisions, Entry into Force, CTBTO Budget.....................................15
 
CTBT Negotiations and the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty................................................15
 
Key Provisions of the CTBT...................................................................................................18
 
International Efforts on Behalf of Entry into Force.................................................................22
 
Budget of the CTBTO Preparatory Commission.....................................................................25
 
Stockpile Stewardship....................................................................................................................27
 
CTBT Pros and Cons.....................................................................................................................39
 
The National Academy of Sciences Study and Its Critics.......................................................39
 
Chronology....................................................................................................................................42
 
For Additional Reading..................................................................................................................44
 
Tables
Table 1. U.S. Nuclear Tests by Calendar Year...............................................................................38
 
Appendixes
Appendix. Chronology, 1992-2009...............................................................................................50
 
Contacts
Author Contact Information...........................................................................................................58
 

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->