• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Sustainable development is a pattern of resource use that aims to meet humanneeds while preserving the environment so that these needs can be met not only inthe present, but in the indefinite future. The term was used by the BrundtlandCommission which coined what has become the most often-quoted definition of sustainable development as development that "meets the needs of the presentwithout compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."[1]Sustainable development ties together concern for the carrying capacity of naturalsystems with the social challenges facing humanity. As early as the 1970s"sustainability" was employed to describe an economy "in equilibrium with basicecological support systems"[2]. Ecologists have pointed to the “limits of growth”[3]and presented the alternative of a “steady state economy”[4] in order to addressenvironmental concerns. The field of sustainable development can be conceptually broken into threeconstituent parts: environmental sustainability, economic sustainability andsociopolitical sustainability
Scope and definitions
 The concept has included notions of weak sustainability, strong sustainability anddeep ecology. Sustainable development does not focus solely on environmentalissues. The United Nations 2005 World Summit Outcome Document refers to the"interdependent and mutually reinforcing pillars" of sustainable development aseconomic development, social development, and environmental protection.Indigenous people have argued, through various international forums such as theUnited Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues and the Convention onBiological Diversity, that there are four pillars of sustainable development, thefourth being cultural. The Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity (UNESCO,2001) further elaborates the concept by stating that "...cultural diversity is asnecessary for humankind as biodiversity is for nature”; it becomes “one of the rootsof development understood not simply in terms of economic growth, but also as ameans to achieve a more satisfactory intellectual, emotional, moral and spiritualexistence". In this vision, cultural diversity is the fourth policy area of sustainabledevelopment.Economic Sustainability: Agenda 21 clearly identified information, integration, andparticipation as key building blocks to help countries achieve development thatrecognises these interdependent pillars. It emphasises that in sustainabledevelopment everyone is a user and provider of information. It stresses the need tochange from old sector-centred ways of doing business to new approaches thatinvolve cross-sectoral co-ordination and the integration of environmental and socialconcerns into all development processes. Furthermore, Agenda 21 emphasises that
 
broad public participation in decision making is a fundamental prerequisite forachieving sustainable development.According to Hasna, sustainability is a process which tells of a development of allaspects of human life affecting sustenance. It means resolving the conflict betweenthe various competing goals, and involves the simultaneous pursuit of economicprosperity, environmental quality and social equity famously known as threedimensions (triple bottom line) with is the resultant vector being technology, henceit is a continually evolving process; the ‘journey(the process of achievingsustainability) is of course vitally important, but only as a means of getting to thedestination (the desired future state). However,the ‘destination’ of sustainability isnot a fixed place in the normal sense that we understand destination. Instead, it is aset of wishful characteristics of a future system.Green development is generally differentiated from sustainable development in thatGreen development prioritizes what its proponents consider to be environmentalsustainability over economic and cultural considerations. Proponents of SustainableDevelopment argue that it provides a context in which to improve overallsustainability where cutting edge Green development is unattainable. For example,a cutting edge treatment plant with extremely high maintenance costs may not besustainable in regions of the world with fewer financial resources. Anenvironmentally ideal plant that is shut down due to bankruptcy is obviously lesssustainable than one that is maintainable by the community, even if it is somewhatless effective from an environmental standpoint.Some research activities start from this definition to argue that the environment is acombination of nature and culture. The Network of Excellence "SustainableDevelopment in a Diverse World",[8] sponsored by the European Union, integratesmultidisciplinary capacities and interprets cultural diversity as a key element of anew strategy for sustainable development.Still other researchers view environmental and social challenges as opportunities fordevelopment action. This is particularly true in the concept of sustainable enterprisethat frames these global needs as opportunities for private enterprise to provideinnovative and entrepreneurial solutions. This view is now being taught at manybusiness schools including the Center for Sustainable Global Enterprise at CornellUniversity and the Erb Institute for Global Sustainable Enterprise at the University of Michigan. The United Nations Division for Sustainable Development lists the following areas ascoming within the scope of sustainable development.
ESSAY SAMPLE ON "THE NEED FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT"
By the year 2200 there will be a lot more people living on this planet then there arenow. Estimates range anywhere from 15 to 36 billion people. Where will thesepeople live? How will they live? The answer is sustainable development. Sustainable
 
development, "meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. " It also, "requires meeting the basicneeds of all peoples and extending to them the opportunity to fulfill their aspirationsfor a better life. A world in which poverty is endemic will always be prone toecological and other catastrophes." Sustainable development is being ignored inChile, the Philippines, and Siberia, practiced in Madagascar and in Alaska, andexamined in the Lake Baikal region of Russia. These Countries must learn from eachother's failures and success to discover what sustainable development involves intheir own country.Sustainable development has three divisions, economic, environmental, and social.If sustainability is to occur it must, meet these three divisions. In Chile, none of these divisions is being met. Economically speaking, almost 40% of the populationis poor and as a result many make a living directly from the land clearing forests. Inthe IVth region of Chile, forest regions are being depleted at an amazing rate. Thisdepletion of the forest in this region results in two main things, one, people mustspend increasing amounts of energy traveling to the site of present cutting and two,the removal of the trees over time has lead to soil erosion and rapid desertificationof the area. This soil erosion also removes many nutrients from the soil making theland poor for agriculture. The third division, social, is not met here either. The lack of organizations to relieve the negative effects of poverty on the environment haveonly contributed to the problem.In the Philippines the environmental degradation is similar in nature but morecatastrophic in result. There in the province of Leyte 6000 people were killed whenflash flood ripped through Ormoc City in 1991. The floods were a result of logging of a forest in that region and conversion of that area into commercial farming practicessuch as sugarcane. This in itself did not cause the floods, the conversion of theforest into farming left the heavy rain from a typhoon with nowhere to go. Normallythe forest would have stopped any flash floods as it would have held the water let itout slowly, but with the forests gone there was nothing to delay the water fromexiting the system. The economical effect of this that land and buildings weredestroyed causing millions of peso's worth of damage. The social impact is easy todiscern, those who lost loved ones, friends, and family can never get them back.In Madagascar the same type of thing was happening. Locals were cutting down theforest and planting rice and cassava. It was estimated that this process of deforestation was costing the country between, "100 and 300 million a year indecreased crop yields, the loss of productive forests and damage to infrastructure."Something needed to be done, the government implemented a plan to, "protect andimprove the environment while working for sustainable development." The approach integrates all aspects of sustainable development. Socially, a publiceducation programme explains why locals shouldn't cut down the tree's and why itis economically more important that they don't. Environmentally, the forests will not
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...