Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
See Premium Plans
 
Exhibit A
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1825-1 Filed08/18/12 Page1 of 12
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
A
PPLE
’
S
S
ECOND
R
EVISED
D
RAFT OF
P
ROPOSED
S
PECIAL
V
ERDICT
F
ORM
C
ASE
N
O
.
 
11-
CV
01846-LHK
 
(PSG)pa-1547512
 HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)hmcelhinny@mofo.comMICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)mjacobs@mofo.comRACHEL KREVANS (CA SBN 116421)rkrevans@mofo.comJENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368) jtaylor@mofo.comALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)atucher@mofo.comRICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)rhung@mofo.comJASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530) jasonbartlett@mofo.comMORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 Market StreetSan Francisco, California 94105-2482Telephone: (415) 268-7000Facsimile: (415) 268-7522Attorneys for Plaintiff andCounterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC.WILLIAM F. LEEwilliam.lee@wilmerhale.comWILMER CUTLER PICKERINGHALE AND DORR LLP60 State StreetBoston, MA 02109Telephone: (617) 526-6000Facsimile: (617) 526-5000MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.comWILMER CUTLER PICKERINGHALE AND DORR LLP950 Page Mill RoadPalo Alto, California 94304Telephone: (650) 858-6000Facsimile: (650) 858-6100UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIASAN JOSE DIVISIONAPPLE INC., a California corporation,Plaintiff,v.SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., aKorean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICSAMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; andSAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONSAMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liabilitycompany,Defendants.Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
APPLE’S SECOND REVISED DRAFTOF PROPOSED SPECIAL VERDICTFORM
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1825-1 Filed08/18/12 Page2 of 12
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
pa-1533697A
PPLE
’
S
S
ECOND
R
EVISED
D
RAFT OF
P
ROPOSED
S
PECIAL
V
ERDICT
F
ORM
 C
ASE
N
O
.
 
11-CV-01846-LHK
1
pa-1547512
 We, the jury, unanimously agree to the answers to the following questions and return them underthe instructions of this Court as our verdict in this case.
FINDINGS ON APPLE’S CLAIMSAPPLE’S UTILITY AND DESIGN PATENT CLAIMS AGAINST SAMSUNG1.
 
For each of the following products, has Apple proven that it is more likely than notthat Samsung infringed the indicated Apple utility patent claims?
(Please answer in each cell with a “Y” for “yes” (for Apple), or with an “N” for “no” (forSamsung). You do not have to provide an answer for any cell that has gray shading.)
Accused Samsung Product’381 Patent(Claim 19)’915 Patent(Claim 8)’163 Patent(Claim 50)
Intercept (JX1009)Vibrant (JX1010)Captivate (JX1011)Epic 4G (JX1012)Fascinate (JX1013)Galaxy Ace (JX1030)[SEC only]Galaxy S (i9000) (JX1007)[SEC only]Galaxy S II (AT&T) (JX1031)Galaxy S II (i9100) (JX1032)[SEC only]Galaxy S II (T-Mobile) (JX1033)Transform (JX1014)Mesmerize (JX1015)Continuum (JX1016)Galaxy Tab (original or 7.0) (JX1036)Galaxy S 4G (JX1019)Gem (JX1020)Galaxy Prevail (JX1022)Nexus S 4G (JX1023)Replenish (JX1024)Droid Charge (JX1025)Infuse 4G (JX1027)Indulge (JX1026)Galaxy Tab 10.1 (WiFi and 4G LTE)(JX1037 & JX1038)Exhibit 4G (JX1028)
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1825-1 Filed08/18/12 Page3 of 12
Search
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
    • Notes
    Load more