Professional Documents
Culture Documents
December 2010
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................... 1
SUMMARY OF ICM IMPLEMENTATION RESULTS OF DONGYING, CHINA ............... 2
................................................................................................................... 6
........................................................................................................................... 8
1. .......................................................................................................... 10
2. ................................................................. 12
2.1 ....................................................................................... 12
2.1.1 ............................................................................................ 12
2.1.2 .................................................................................... 13
2.1.3 ............................................................................................ 15
2.2 ....................................................................... 16
2.3 ....................................................................................... 19
3 ............................................................................... 21
3.1 ............................................................................................................... 21
3.1.1 ........................................................ 21
3.1.2 ............................................................ 22
3.1.3 ................................................................ 23
3.2 ....................................................................................... 24
3.2.1 ................................................................................................ 24
3.2.2 ................................................................................................ 25
3.2.3 ................................................................................................ 25
3.3 ............................................................................... 26
3.3.1 ........................................................ 26
3.3.2 .................................................... 27
3.3.3 ................................................................ 30
3.3.4 ............................................................ 33
3.3.5 .................................................... 38
3.3.6 ............................................................................ 39
3.4 ............................................................................................... 40
3.4.1 ............................................................ 40
3.4.2 ................................................ 45
3.5 ............................................................................................................... 52
3.5.1 ............................................ 52
3.5.2 ................................................................................................ 52
4. .................................................................................. 54
4.1 ................................................................................... 54
4.1.1 ............................................................................ 54
4.1.2 ................................................................................................ 57
4.2 ....................................................................................................... 58
5. .......................................................................................................... 92
5.1 ............................................................................... 92
5.2 ............................................................................................... 93
................................................................................................................. 95
......................................................................................................... 97
II
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
programs as early as in 2005. Since then, ICM programs were developed, tested and
implemented as means to achieve the goal of balancing economic development and
environmental conservation and sustainable use of valuable marine resources. The
State of Coast Reporting initiated by the GEF/UNDP/PEMSEA Project in both
demonstration and parallel sites across East Asian Sea region serves as a timely
opportunity for Dongying to monitor and evaluate the implementation of its ICM
programs in a holistic way by examining both governance and sustainable
development aspects of ICM programs. The exercise also takes note of the gaps to be
filled by its future programs to enable adaptive management for assured on-theground impact of the ICM programs.
Areas
Indicator
No.
Status in
2009
4 laws
3 new laws
Law enforcement
capacity
Regional
development
strategy and plan
Governance
Management
capacity
development
Status in
2005
Strategies &
plans
Financial
support
Description
1
Policies & laws
Institution &
mechanisms
Indicator
Institution for
ICM
Coordination
mechanism for
ICM
No large tonnage
ships; GIS is not
used
5 new plans
6 new plans
No institution
No mechanism
Management fund
<RMB 10 million
>RMB 50 million
Sustainable
financing
About RMB 1
million
Hardware
construction
No real-time
monitoring system
10
Software
construction
Initial stage
Results
11
Public awareness
Few activities
12
Stakeholder
participation
Only government
partners
13
Population and
economy density
14
Percentage of
marine economy
in GDP
Public
participation
Socio-economic
Sustainability
Sustainable development
Environmental
safeguard
capacity
15
Livelihood
investment
16
Environmental
monitoring
system
17
Pollutant load to
sea water
18
19
20
Baseline data
Non existent
No data
Incomplete data
Baseline data
Benthic
biodiversity
Environmental
management
measures in
coastal areas
No data
Baseline data
No data
Rural environment
management plan in place
and increased investment in
sewage treatment
Capacity to
sustainably use
resources
21
Ratio of
environmental
investment to
GDP
Baseline data
Decreasing
22
No data
23
92.4%
86.3%
24
Usable coastline
No data
Reclaimed coastline
representing 63%
25
Ratio of
renewable energy
No data
Under development
26
Supply of fishery
products
Valued at RMB1.89
billion
27
Areas of natural
wetlands
69%
65%
28
Coastal resources
management
measures
Stock of marine
species replenished
through release of
artificial propagated
fish fries, mollusks,
etc
29
Establishment of
MPA network and
management
30
31
Disaster
prevention and
reduction
32
Awareness of
coastal risks in
coastal
management
Disaster-induced
social and
economic loss
Measures and
capacity to
prevent and
reduce disasters
No data
No detail reports
No data
No data
No marine
environment
monitoring and
forecast unit and
plans
Marine environment
monitoring and forecast
center established in 2006,
emergency responses plans
for red tide, oil spill and
storm surges in place and
monitoring equipment
upgraded
Investment by government in
prevention and reduction of
disasters and results
2005
2
32 2005 2010
12
20
10
11
12
13
14
GDP
15
16
30
17
18
19
20
21
GDP
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
1983
2000 14% 2009
184.59 GDP 2058.97
102370 15114
2005
ICM, Integrated
Coastal Management
Chua, 2006
PEMSEA
NWLGI2008
Chua2006
1.
8053
1
80% 85%
48.3 2300.4 2008
1550.96 135
412.67 6000
1983
2000
10
11
2.
2.1
2.1.1
20 100 3000
5 2 3 2000
1917 50
47
600
413 1/7 180
2/3 -15 4800 1/3
30
130
50 40
10 2008 40.72
31.02
12
6 7
412.67 0
12 0-5 15.29
75
74 600 600
1150
3992.11
360
4-20m/s
2.1.2
1
13
413
541 335
13 178 8 4
3 3
14
2.1.3
8 4 93
220 1.8
15
2.2
16
3
16
5
2
17
100%
2008
2007 6%
2008 76.3%
4
1 10
69.5 8315
86 83.5
94% 6.51
50 81.4
200
6
1990 12 1992 10
15.3
2008-2009 1691
18
24
2.3
2009 11 23
2009138
19
PEMSEA
ICM
3
2009 8 75%
87.5%75%
20
3
3.1
3.1.1
Mc Manusand Chua,
1990; Chua et al, 1987; ITTXDP,1997; MTE, 1996
Chua
2006
PEMSEA
Reporting System of the Coast
Status
21
3.1.2
UNESCO, 2006
PEMSEA, 2010
Chua, 2006
Baseline
Report
22
3.1.3
23
3.2
Batangas
NOAA19982001SOC-EU
3.2.1
SOC-NC 2008;
2009; 2010
2008
2009
2010
SOCFlorida, 1996
SOCVirginia, 2001
24
3.2.2
2004
SOC -EU
26
27 1995 2000
7 2004
3.2.3
Batangas SOCBatangas
PEMSEA 1994
PEMSEA
PEMSEA
2010
25
3.3
3.3.1
812
3456Chua, 2006
26
3.3.2
PEMSEA
9
27
GovernanceSustainable Development
9PEMSEA, 2007
28
SOCBatangas
1
6
Sustainable Development
1987
29
PEMSEA
PEMSEA 2 11
6
4
3.3.3
indicare
30
Duda, 2002
Chua, 1998; Olsen et al, 1999; JOC, 2003; Olsen, 2003; IMCAM Online
discussion on Indicators, 2003; AID Environment et al, 2004; IOC, 2005
31
General Indicators
Subsidiary Indicators
GDP
PEMSEA 32
27 5
GDP
GDP
32
PEMSEA
3.3.4
32 3
10
1 Objective PEMSEA
33
10
2 Item
6
4
34
1 GDP
3 Indicator 32
1
35
10
11
12
13
14
GDP
15
GDP
36
GDP
GDP
GDP
16
17
18
19
20
23
GDP
24
25
26
27
28
21
22
29
30
31
32
GDP
37
3.3.5
6 11
38
11
3.3.6
PEMSEA
4
39
3.4
32
3.4.1
1.
1.
2.
3.
2.
1.
2.
40
3.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
5.
ICM
41
1.
2.
3.
6.
1.
2.
7.
1.
2.
8.
42
1.
2.
3.
9.
1.
2.
3.
10.
1.
2.
43
11.
1.
2.
3.
12.
1.
2.
44
3.4.2
13.
GDP
1.
2.
GDP
14. GDP
GDP
GDP
1. GDP
2. GDP
GDP
15.
GDP
1.
45
2.
GDP
16.
1.
2.
3.
17.
1.
2.
18.
1.
46
2.
3.
19. *
1.
2.
20.
1.
2.
21. GDP
GDP
GDP
1.
47
2. GDP
GDP
22. *
1.
2.
23.
1.
2.
24.
1.
48
2.
25. *
1.
2.
26.
1.
2.
27. *
49
1.
2.
28.
1.
2.
3.
29. *
1.
2.
30.
50
1.
2.
3.
31.
1.
2.
32.
1.
2.
3.
51
3.5
3.5.1
1
PEMSEA 11
6
4
2PEMSEA 35
25 2
5 10 32
3.5.2
1
2
3
52
53
4.
4.1
4.1.1
3
1 Objective
2 Item
6
4
54
10
11
12
13
14
GDP
15
16
17
18
19
20
55
21
GDP
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
56
1 GDP
3 Indicator
32
4.1.2
2006
2010 2005
4 2009
57
4.2
3
2005
2009
GIS
1000
5000
100
130
10
11
12
13
0.437
2.78 /
0.447 4.99
/
14
GDP
89.4
GDP7.8%
309.7
GDP15%
15
58
ICM
16
17
18
19
20
21
GDP
GDP
22
92.4%
86.3%
63%
25
26
18.9
32.9
27
69%
4%
23
24
2007
5200
28
29
30
31
2006
32
59
A.
ICM
B.
2002
1) 2004.1
2) 2004.6
3) 2004.12
4)
5) 2005.11
6) 2007.4
7) 2008
C.
60
A.
B.
2010 300
2009
C.
12
61
A.
B.
1) 2009.12
2) 2009.9
3) 2009.9
4) 2009.9
5) 2006.6
6) 2005
C.
13
62
A.
B.
1) ICM2009.4
2) 2007.4
3) 2007.4
4) 2007.4
5) 2007.4
6) 2007.4
7) 200322
2003.9
C.
14
63
A.
ICM
B.
2010
2010
C.
15
64
A.
B.
2010 4
C.
16
65
A.
B.
2005 609.58
2009 5200
30% 20% 30% 20%
2009 80%
C.
66
A.
B.
2005 100
2009 130
C.
67
A.
B.
3425.96
C.
17
68
10
A.
ICM
ICM
B.
2008 367 162
151 60 206 5
16 50 12 49 80
33 73 2 5
17
2005
PEMSEA PNLGEAS Congress
PNLG GEF/UNDP
GEF/UNDP/UNOPS
C.
ICM
69
11
A.
B.
PEMSEA
http://www.hsdy.gov.cn
http://www.icmdy.cn
http://www.pemsea.cn
WWFWetland
international
18
C.
70
12
A.
stakeholder
B.
2010 5 30
9
C.
19
71
13
A.
GDP
B.
2005 0.437 GDP 2.78
2009 0.447 GDP
4.99 2005
4
GDP
2005
0.437
2.78
2009
0.447
4.99
C.
2009 2005 0.01
2.21
72
14 GDP
A.
B.
2004 77.27 GDP 8.6%2005
89.38 GDP 7.8%2009
309.67 GDP 15.04%
2004/2009 5
5 2004/2009
2004
2009
35.08
80.17
21.17
26.82
8.94
34.11
0.89
38.96
C.
2005 3.5 GDP
15%
73
15
A.
B.
6
2005
1.9%
2032.2
24.0
115
85.1%
27.2%
31.8%
2009
1.88%
1962.7
25.35
481
99.5%
30.0%
35.1%
C.
1(Engel's Coefficient)
74
16
A.
B.
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
3 9
C.
20
75
17
A.
B.
72008 /
2008
COD
122,555
12,176
584
2008
C.
2005
2008
21
76
18
A.
B.
2005 2009
2005 2009
22 2005/2009
C.
77
19
A.
biodiversity
B.
2009 8
95 459 ind/m2
(d) 50%
2.5 2.64-(H)
4.12 0.27 J 0.8-1
() 0.2
C.
78
20
A.
B.
1)
1.3 4
/
1.4
5 /
6000 2.5 /
5 /
1
5 800 6
300
2)
5.4 21
16 39
23 3
3)
C.
79
21 GDP
A.
GDP
B.
8
GDP
GDP
2005
41332.9
35.44
37903.3
32.50
2009
68188
33.12
40979
19.90
2009 2005
GDP
C.
10 2009 2005
80
22
A.
B.
92009 8
0.008 mg/L
0.05 mg/L
0.17
0.009 mg/L
0.19
2.1410-6
500.010-6
0.004
6.4910-6
0.01
2009 8
C.
2700
93
76 /144.4
23
81
23
A.
B.
12.23 48 60
10
2005
4.56
92.4%
2009
8.21
86.3%
C.
82
24
A.
2.21
32.4
B.
C.
63% 37%
83
25
A.
2714.3
2500 374.8W/m2
1150
B.
5
2007 15
10
C.
24
84
26
A.
600
50 40 10
B.
112005/2009
2005
42
67.77
18.9
2009
42.36
81.1
32.93
C.
2009
42.36 2005
24
25
85
27
A.
B.
3801.57 km2
26 2004/2008
C.
1 2010 4
86
28
A.
B.
2001 1300 2001
20 2003 2004 7 2006
10 2008 3
2009 2800
1.68
2005
27 4167 1.22
5.05 2400 730 570
C.
27
87
29
A.
327,626
B.
2007 6 200748
3729
1352
2007 1720
C.
18
28
88
30
A.
B.
3 9
C.
29
89
31
A.
12009 132
33
100.23 95 2009
9.44
B.
1) 12
3 3 1 2
2) 9216
9711 5 7
3) 78
3 1997 11 12.7
5.7
4) 1992 6 12 2.05
1500
5) 2002
25.75 km
66.7 20 90 10
C.
30
1. 2009 2010 3
http://www.soa.gov.cn/hyjww/ml/gb/lj/webinfo/2010/03/1265846970087904.htm
90
32
A.
B.
2006
2008
300
390
50
6 5
C.
91
5.
5.1
32
2005 2009
2010 4
2009
2010
92
1. 2.
5.2
93
2006 2010
3
PEMSEA
94
[1].
Chua, T.E. 2006. The Dynamics of Integrated Coastal Management: Practical Applications
in the Sustainable Coastal Development in East Asia. 468 p. GEF/UNDP/IMO/PEMSEA,
Quezon City, Philippines.
[2].
[3].
Maltby, E., Holdgate, M., Acreman, M., Weir, A., 1999. Ecosystem management, questions
for science and society. Royal Holloway Institute for Environmental Research, Royal
Holloway, University of London, Egham.
[4].
Measuring and Reporting Progress: State of the Coasts Reporting. National Workshop for
Local Governments Implementing ICM in China, 2008.
[5].
Monitoring and Evaluation Indicators for GEF International Waters Projects. Monitoring
and Evaluation Working Paper 10. Global Environment Facility. Washington, DC, USA.
ISBN 1-884122-77-9. Alfred Duda, 2002.
[6].
SOC-NOAA. http://stateofthecoast.noaa.gov/
[7].
State of the Coast Report 2008-Stormwater: the way forward. North Carolina Coastal
Federation.
[8].
State of the Coast Report 2009- The Future of Our Beaches. North Carolina Coastal
Federation.
[9].
State of the Coast Report 2010- The coastal road less traveled: a travel guide with a
conscience. North Carolina Coastal Federation.
95
[19]. http://www.soa.gov.cn/hyjww/hygb/A0207index_1.htm
[20]. Nova ScotiaSOChttp://www.gov.ns.ca/coast/state-of-the-coast.htm
[21]. 200812
[22]. SOChttp://www.vliz.b/projects/sail/indicators.php#
[23]. ()2010.4
96
97