I
23
4
56
'1
I
9
10
11
!2
13
14
15
16
l1
18
t9
2A
2I
2223
24
252627
Dr.
Orly
Taitz
ESQ
29839
Santa
Margarita
PKWY,
ste
100
Rancho
Santa
MargaritaCA
92688
Counsel
for
Plaintiffs
US
DISTRICT
COURTCENTRAL
DISTRICT
OF
CALIFORNIA
Pamela
Bamett,
Alan
Keyes,
et
al)
Case
No.:
09-0082
Plaintiffs,
)
vs.)
Rule
60
motion
Barack
Obama,
et
al
)
Defendants
)
))
REPLY TOOPPOSITIONPlaintiffs
are
replying
tothe
oppositionto
the
motion
for
reconsideration
for
the
Leave
ofCourt
to
lile
a Second
Amended
Complaint
as
follows:
Keyes
et al
v
obana
Reply
to
oppositioD
to
Motio4
for
reconsiderati
Case 8:09-cv-00082-DOC-AN Document 134 Filed 08/27/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:2537
2
3
56
€
9
10
t1
72
l3
14
:15
16
11
:18
19
2021
2223
24
21
2A
I.
I)efendants
are shamelesslv
misrepresentins
the
statuteand
defraudinq
the
court.
for
which
their
attorneys
should
be
sanctionedRule
60
b
states
as
follows:
RULE60.
RELIEF
FROM
A
ruDCMENT
OR
ORDER
(al
coico66
8r$b
oN
c{roL
M6r^xa
06(6
o
o(soNs.
Th.
.o!n
may
.ore.r
a
.l€ri..l fri'tak.
o.
a
mnrak.
ansins from
d.6iqhr
or
onissionwhon.v.roneirfoundinajudsme,dd{,oiorhsp.norlh€rerord.Th.colnm.vdosoo.motionoroniBown,wiihorwithour
iori.e, Sutaile.an
appealhas
beei do.keted
n
the
appe
ate.ou|tandwhi!
t
i5
pendins,
su.h
a
m
nake
maybecoirected
on
ywih
the
(b)CRouNDsroRRfltrnoM^FNALIIDGMINr,oRDejorPRocftDNc.odmonondndlunterms,thecoudmayre€veapahyortsLegarepreientatv.kom
i
finar
judsru.t.
od€.,
ar
p
ll)
miliaLe,
nadv.fr.nce,
!urpris., or.r.usable
n.9edi
(2)newly
discov€red.viden(e
rhat.
wnh reasonabl.
dilrqen..,.ould
nor have
b..n
dis.overed
in
t
me
ro
mov€
ror
a
new
Far
under
Bllc
r9{!)
(3)
fraud
(wherher
prevloudy
ca
€d
inftrnt.or.xtinsn),
m
5repres.iiaton
ar
mBcondudbytrn
opposinspar.y;
(4)
thejudsment
n
vo
di
(t)
ihejudgftnt
h.s
b.en satistied,
rel€as€d,
o' dis.hars.d:
it is ba3.d
on
an
.adier
j
u
dgn€nt
thar
ha'
be..
rm6.d
orvaGt.d;or
applyinq tprospedivcy
ls no
lo
(6)
any
oth.r
Ealon
th{junlti.s
r.lief.
(d
T'Y'Marc
€*to
or
Br
r,iloro(
(l)
I/,,r9.
A
motio.
unner
rule
60l!)
mus
bemade
a(hln
a
r.asonable
iime-
rnd
ror
reasons
(l),
(2).and(3)no more
rhan
a
year
ari€r
rh..ntry
ot
rhejudqm.nt
orod.r
orthe
d.te
of
th.
pro.e€d'ng.
Plaintiffsspecifically
argued
that Rule
60
motion
should
be
grantedunder
Rule
60
b(2)
and
(6)Plaintiffs
conveniently twisted
the
pleading
and
claimedthat
the
motion
is
filed
under
rule 60b(2)
and
therefore it
is
untimely.
However time
limitation
is
only
under rule
60
bl,2
and 3.
There
is
no
time
limitation
on
Rule 60b(6).
Motion
clearly
includes
60
b(6).
"anvother
reason
thatjustifies
relief'.
There
is
no
time
limitation
on
60b(6).
It
canbe
hled
10
years
afterjudgment
and
a
100years
afterjudgment.
At
issue is
the most serious
crime
ever
to
be
committed
against the
United
States
o
America, specifically
usurpation
ofthe
U.S. Presidency
by
a
foreign national,
xeyes
et a]
v
obafra
Reply
to
opposition
to
Morion
I.r
reconsidelation
Case 8:09-cv-00082-DOC-AN Document 134 Filed 08/27/12 Page 2 of 11 Page ID #:2538
6
9
10
1:l
)2
13
)4
l5l6
I1
L8
2t
2223
24
25
2.1
citizen
iflndonesia
and
possibly
still
a
citizen
ofKenya
and
Creat
Britain,
Barack
Hussein Obama,
who
was able
to
get
into
the
position
ofthe
U.S. Senator
from
Illionis,
U.S. President
and
currently
a
candidate
for
the 2012
election by
virtue
of
fraud,
use
of
forged and
fraudulentlyobtained
lDs
and a
Racketeering
scheme,
which
involves corflrpt
high
ranking
officials
ofthe
U.S.govemment
and
the
govemment
of
the
State
of
Har.raii.
It
serves
iusticefor
the
court to
review
theevidence
provided
andgrantthe leave o
court to
file
the
Second
AmendedComplaint.
There
is no
other
cause
that would
serve
Justice more
than
ending the
usurpation
of
the U.S. Presidencv
and annexation and
usurpation
of
the
civilrishts
of everv
American
citizen due
to
the
usurnation
of
the
U.S.
Presidencv.
Defendants attomeys,
who
are assistant
aftomeys
ofthe
U.S.
aftomeys'office
clearly
saw
thatRule60b(6)
was
stated,
they
knew that
under
60b(6)
a
Motion
for
Reconsideration
can be
filed
at
any
time,
they
simply
provided
a
bogus argumentand defrauded the
court by
claiming
that
the
moiion
is
not
timely
and
theyshould
be
sanctioned
fbr
it.
II.
Defendants claim
of"Res
Judicata'r-
is a
fraudulent
statement
"Res
Judicata"
is
applicable,
whenthe
case
is
heardonthe
merits
and
adjudicated
on the
merits. The
issue
ofObama's
use
ofa
forged
birth certificate,
forgedSelective
Service
certificate,
stolen
Connecticut SocialSecurity
number
xxx-xx-
4425,
a name not
legally his
and
the
usurpation
ofthc
U.S.Presidency
while
being
a
foreign
citizen,
was
never
adjudicated
on the
merits. Racketeering conspiracy
of
several
corrupt federal
and
state
olficials
who
are
criminally
complicit
and
are
aiding
and
abetting
Obama and
committing
treasonagainstthe
United
States
of
America,
was
neveradjudicatedon the merits.
xeyes
eL
al v
Obana
Reply
ro
Opposition
to
Motion
for
reconsideration
Case 8:09-cv-00082-DOC-AN Document 134 Filed 08/27/12 Page 3 of 11 Page ID #:2539
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
CA - 2012-08-27 - (CDCA) - KvO - Reply To Opposition - ECF 134
574
Reads
2
Readcasts
0
Embed Views
Recommended
More From This User
Notes
Load more
