Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
 
CAPITOL
FACTS & FIGURES
 TRANSPORTATION
 THE COUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS
 U  G   0 
Unspent Highway Funds
The U.S. Department of Transportation made more than $470million available immediately to states for transportationprojects, according to an Aug. 17, 2012, announcement fromU.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood.
•ThemoneycomesfromfundsinitiallyallocatedtotheDepartmentofTransportationfor671earmarkedtransportationprojectsincludedinappropriationsbillsbetween2003and2006.TheHouseofRepresentatives,inrecentyears,hasbannedearmarksfromspendingbills.•Thetransportationdepartmentisnotifyingstatesabouttheamountofmoneytheyhaveleftfromprojectsthatwerenotcompletedorcostlessthanexpected.Statescanapplytousethosefundsforotherprojects.
1
•Statesareexpectedtoretainanyunusedfundingtheyhavebeenallocated.•StatesmustidentifyplanstousethefundsbyOct.1andobligatethefundingbyDec.31.Fundsnotobli-gatedbytheendoftheyearcangotootherstatesin2013.
2
Statescouldstillspendthefundsontheprojectsforwhichtheywereearmarkedifthoseprojectsarenowreadytomoveforward.
3
•TheObamaadministrationhastheauthoritytorescindtheearmarksbecauseoflanguageincludedintheappropriationsbills.Thisisthersttimethatauthorityhasbeenused.
4
The earmarks were primarily for transportation projects thatare now dead or have been delayed.
•Insomecases,theprojectwascompletedandsomefundingwasleftover.•Otherprojectshavebeenheldupduetodelaysindesign,environmentalreview,additionalfundingavail-abilityorotherissues.
5
Eighteen states have more than $10 million in rescindedearmark funds available.
•Alabama($51.5million),California($43.1million),Texas($30.8million),NewYork($29million)andPennsylvania($28.5million)havethemostfundsavailableamongthestates.•Wyomingistheonlystatewithnofundsavailable.•Californiahas71earmarkedprojectsthatcouldlosefunding,themostofanystate.
6
REFERENCES
1
2
“USDOT Frees Up $473m for State, Local Road & Transit Projects.”Transportation Issues Daily. August 18, 2012. Accessedfrom:
http://www.transportationissuesdaily.com/usdot-frees-up-473m-for-state-local-road-transit-projects/ 
3
 
4
“USDOT Frees Up…”
5
Ibid.
6
Federal Highway Administration. “Unobligated Balances of FY 2003-2006 Appropriation Act Earmarks (as of August 15, 2012).”Accessed from:
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pressroom/redisfy0306states.htm
 
7
Sean Slone, CSG Senior Transportation Policy Analyst |sslone@csg.org
The rescissions could have both advantages and disadvantagesfor states.
•TwoKentuckyroadprojects—aninterchangeandaconnectingroad—nearabusinessandindustrialparkinBowlingGreenforwhichmorethan$7millionwasearmarkedareactuallywellunderway.Theyarebothfullydesigned,rights-of-wayarebeingpurchasedandsomeutilitiesarebeingrelocatedtomakewayfortheprojects.Buttheconstructionphasecan’tmoveforwardbecauseafederallawsuitconcerningenvi-ronmentalreviewstandardsispendingattheappealscourtlevel.StateTransportationCabinetofcialssayit’spossiblethelawsuitwon’tberesolvedbytheendoftheyear,sothestatecouldhavetoreobligatethefundstootherprojectsandndadditionalfederalfundsfortheBowlingGreenprojectslater.•Thereleaseoftheearmarkscangivestatesmoreexibilityincaseswheretheamountofthefederalearmarkdidn’tcomeclosetowhatisactuallyneededforaprojecttobegin.Forexample,Kentuckytrans-portationofcialspointtoa$983,000allocationfortheInterstate66projectinPikeCounty,acomparativelysmallamountonabillion-dollarprojecttheysayisdif-cultforthemtospendeffectively.
7

Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • More From This User

    Notes
    Load more